The Cost Of Prescription Drugs Is Justified Summary

567 Words2 Pages

Richard Epstein, a senior fellow at Hoover Institution writes, “The Cost of Prescription Drugs Is Justified"(2009), which defends the high cost of pharmaceutical drugs that are seen in today’s market. To start, Epstein acknowledges the widespread belief in America that pharmaceutical drugs cost too much. He discusses the rise of profits in drug companies in comparison to their success on Wall Street citing that companies such as Pfizer have had to cut-costs due to a lack of success in stocks. Then, Epstein focuses on four key ideas that help to explain the high cost. The first idea Epstein explores is the economics involved with drug-making. Drug companies earn most of their profits from one or two highly profitable drugs. The author claims that when generics or …show more content…

The time and cost it takes to put a drug through the trials as well as the FDA’s regulations make the rarely successful process a huge commitment for these drug companies. Next, the author compares the cost of drugs to the amount of lawsuits the companies receive. There are many risks to mass-producing drugs and with the FDA siding with Public Safety, the author states that drug companies can lose a lot of money. This is because the FDA is not willing to take any risks in approving drugs due to the repercussions being so severe, The final idea the author discusses is the process of research itself. The drug companies revenue is put towards developing new drugs that will help the public. This can be a very costly process which is why a lot of money is needed to support the research. Epstein’s purpose in writing this article is to defend the rising costs of pharmaceutical drugs in order to get people to understand the drug companies point of view and contributions to society. This article can be considered credible because it comes from Opposing Viewpoints in Context. This is a very reliable database for gathering

Open Document