The Constitution Pros And Cons

1266 Words3 Pages

The United States Constitution is a very controversial document, concerning the laws and power distribution among the different levels of government. The people thought the Constitution was a way to slowly revert back to a monarchy - a government system that they had fought hard against. Even George Washington thought that this system would not last past twenty years. However, despite Washington’s claim, a lot of the delegates writing the Constitution believed that it was flexible enough to last through centuries. Former President Woodrow Wilson would go as far to say that “in its elasticity lies its chief greatness.” When something is described as elastic, it means it does not break easily under different levels of pressure. The goal of the …show more content…

Unfortunately, there comes a point where a rubber band breaks because it is unable to stretch so far. The purpose of the Constitution was to set down multiple laws for an entire country during a specific time period, so it would not turn to chaos; therefore there had to be a limit to its resilience. Despite that fact, though, the Constitution has lasted until today making it flexible to a certain extent. Although there are parts of the Constitution that have to be resistant, it is overall a very elastic document due to how different situations shape the laws. The Constitution’s flexibility is demonstrated in the implied powers to the federal government. Article I Section 8 of the Constitution states that the central government can “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper” in order help the execution of powers clearly stated in the Constitution. This …show more content…

In Article V it states that in order to place an amendment you need two-thirds of Congress agreeing with it, have two-thirds of the states call conventions concerning it, and then have three-fourths of the states need to ratify it in order for it to be considered a part of the Constitution. Due to this, there have only been twenty-seven amendments since the Constitution was ratified. According to this, the Constitution, while a flexible document, is not flexible to change. However, the fact that the government is able to change laws at all makes it very flexible. In fact, there was an alcohol amendment placed in the Eighteenth Amendment that prohibited alcohol throughout the country but was then amended later in the Twenty-First Amendment which gave states power over alcohol laws. This proves that the Constitution was made to keep up with the popular demands of the time. Additionally, if making amendments were easy, then there would be a lot of unreasonable changes leading to tyranny. If the government could amend whatever they wanted without restrictions, then there is a chance that most of the states would not be happy. Therefore it is necessary to make sure a fair majority of the population agree with the change. It is not restrictive, but a smart and proactive way of thinking. Therefore, despite the amendment process of the Constitution being restricted, the

Open Document