The Compromise of 1850: A Temporary Solution

845 Words2 Pages

Compromise, according to the New Oxford Dictionary, is an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions. Throughout history, favored compromises, as well as controversial ones, have been made, such as the Compromise of 1850. Arguably one of the most debated compromises in the history of America, the Compromise was first proposed by Henry Clay on January 29, 1850, (pbs.org), and was intended to ease the growing tensions between the North and South. While successful, it was only a temporary solution. In retrospect, this particular agreement did more harm than good. The Compromise of 1850 acted as a catalyst for the Civil War because it demonstrated the North and South’s inabilities to come to agreement and further strained relationships between the two sections of the nation.
Originally a single bill, the Compromise was composed of five parts. Firstly, California would be admitted to the Union as a free state. In exchange, the South was guaranteed that no government restrictions on slavery would be placed on the territories of New Mexico and Utah (ushistory.org). Thirdly, Texas would lose its boundary claims to New Mexico, but Congress would pay ten million dollars to Texas in compensation. Furthermore, the slave trade was to be prohibited in Washington D.C, but slavery itself would still be maintained (ushistory.org). Finally, the Fugitive Slave Act would be passed, requiring Northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners, under penalty of law (ushistory.org).
At the time of his proposal, Clay planned for the Compromise to solve all the current issues of the nation immediately. Instead, his solution created more problems. Following the Mexican War, the North and South squabbled over t...

... middle of paper ...

...as a free state and of the prohibition of slave trade in Washington D.C. The Compromise did very little to permanently diffuse sectional tensions, and the North and South turned to unavoidable war to settle their disputes.

Works Cited
Goldfield, Abbot, Anderson, J. Arsinger, P. Arsinger, Barney, Weir. The American
Journey: A History of the United States. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc. 2007. Print.
"The Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2014. .
"The Compromise of 1850 Begins the March to Civil War." Examiner.com. AXS Digital Group, n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014. .
"The Compromise of 1850." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2014. .

Sectional Compromises In The 19th Century
1433 Words | 3 Pages
There are two mind paths to choose when considering the statement that the compromises of the 1800s were not really compromises, but sectional sellouts by the North, that continually gave in to the South's wishes. The first is that the compromises really were compromises, and the second is that the compromises were modes of the North selling out. Really, there is only one correct path between these two, and that is that the North sold out during these compromises and gave the South what it wanted for minimal returns. The three main compromises of the 19th century, the compromises of 1820 (Missouri) and 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 each were ways for the south to gain more power so that eventually, it could secede. First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it.
Read More
The Differences between the North and South on the Eve of the Civil War
650 Words | 2 Pages
This meant that the balance between the Free states and slave states was equal and therefore they were able to make the compromise. Industry in the North was making rapid progress; there was urbanisation and big cities such as Chicago were taking form. However the North was still agricultural as well as being industrialised. The south also had made some progress, however not... ... middle of paper ... ...
Read More
Analysis of The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun
3726 Words | 8 Pages
Eibling, Harold H., et al., eds. History of Our United States. 2nd edition. River Forest, Ill: Laidlaw Brothers, 1968.
Read More
The Breakup of the Union
841 Words | 2 Pages
In the years paving the way to the Civil War, both north and south were disagreeable with one another, creating the three “triggering” reasons for the war: the fanaticism on the slavery issue, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the separation of the Democratic Party. North being against the bondage of individuals and the South being for it, there was no real way to evade the clash. For the south slavery was a form of obtaining a living, without subjugation the economy might drop majorly if not disappear. In the North there were significant ethical issues with the issue of subjugation. Amazing measures to keep and dispose of subjugation were taken and there was never a genuine adjusted center for bargain. Despite the fact that there were a lot of seemingly insignificant issues, the fundamental thing that divided these two states was bondage and the flexibilities for it or against. With these significant extremes, for example, John Brown and Uncle Tom's Cabin, the south felt disdain towards the danger the Northerners were holding against their alleged flexibilities. The more hatred the South advanced, the more combative they were to anything the Northerners did. Northerners were irritated and it parted Democrats over the issue of bondage and made another Republican gathering, which included: Whigs, Free Soilers, Know Nothings and previous Democrats and brought about a split of segments and abbreviated the street to common war. Southerners loathed the insubordination of the north and started to address how they could stay with the Union.
Read More
Was The Reconstruction A Success Or A Failure
957 Words | 2 Pages
Walens, Susann. A. United States History Since 1877. Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT. September 2007.
Read More
The Compromise of 1850
385 Words | 1 Pages
One item in the Compromise of 1850 was the provision for a stronger Fugitive Slave Law. This new law made it a federal crime to not return a runaway slave to the south. The law also established that any suspected runaway slave was to be tried by a single judge, not by a jury. Also, these judges were compensated by a system that provided them with more money for deciding that the slave was guilty than innocent. This law obviously encouraged people not to harbor runaway slaves, and when they were caught, it provided the judge an incentive to have them returned to the south.
Read More
Gender and Power in the Salem Witch Trials
1138 Words | 3 Pages
Goldfield, David. The American Journey A History of the United States. New Jersey: Pearson 2011
Read More
Analysis Of The Irrepressible Conflict Between The North And South
1061 Words | 3 Pages
The new territories and the discussion of whether they would be admitted to the Union free or slave-holding stirred up animosity. The Compromise of 1850 which offered stricter fugitive slave laws, admitted California as a free state, allowed slavery in Washington D.C., and allowed new territories to choose whether they wanted to be slave-holding or free was supposed to help ease tension between the North and South. Yet Southern states wanted more new territories to be slave-holders so the institution of it would continue to grow. They believed slavery was a way of life and as Larrabee said in his senate speech, “You cannot break apart this organization and this system that has intertwined itself into every social and political fiber of that great people who inhabit one-half of the Union.” (“There is a Conflict of Races”).
Read More
The U.S. Constitution and Slavery
408 Words | 1 Pages
The south and the north made numerous compromises to create a great nation. The first indirect compromise was when the constitution didn’t mention slavery in the constitution, they left that for the states to deal with. After years after when the congress decide to stop the slave trade in 1808, they gave the south time to adjust to this but they new that by the time the slave trade died line was over the slave would have reproduces and they would have more slaves. Third compromise gave the south more power. They had notice that they had less seats in the house of representative. States with the most slaves, for instance Virginia and Maryland, were get out number in the house of representative, so the compromised to have the slave counted as part of the population. They got three counts for every five slaves. This helped balance the house of representative.
Read More
Ida B. Wells, Booker T, Washington, and W.E.B Dubois
1245 Words | 3 Pages
Divine, Robert A. America past and Present. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Longman, 2013. 245. Print.
Read More
Events Leading To The Civil War
866 Words | 2 Pages
The 1850's were a turbulent time in American history. The North and South were seeing total different views on the issue of slavery. The North saw slavery as immoral and that it was unconstitutional. The south on the other hand saw slavery as their right. The South viewed African Americans as lower human beings which justified slavery. "The 1850's was a time of attempted compromise when compromise was no longer possible." This quote best describes this time period, because Americans were trying to compromise their views to prevent a large conflict, but there were many events which made a compromise impossible.
Read More
The American Civil War Was Inevitable
1627 Words | 4 Pages
Roark, J.L., Johnson, M.P., Cohen, P.C., Stage, S., Lawson, A., Hartmann, S.M. (2009). The american promise: A history of the united states (4th ed.), The New West and Free North 1840-1860, The slave south, 1820-1860, The house divided 1846-1861 (Vol. 1, pp. 279-354).
Read More
Reconstruction Dbq
662 Words | 2 Pages
The north made a compromise which was a wrong decision and was the start to something worse that was what to come. Also the corruption of the government in the north caused the reconstruction to fall apart. (Background Essay paragraph 1) “1876 was an exciting year for America” “So it is great irony of history that the election of 1876 officially crushed the american dream.” The Compromise of 1877 was a compromise that gave both sides what they assumed they wanted. (Background Essay, Paragraph 4) The Compromise was introduced because of the presidential election. The north wanted there president and the south wanted theirs. The Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes against the Democratic Candidate Samuel J. Tilden. So the north wanted to make a compromise and they wanted to give the north and the south what they wanted. The north got their president and the south got the union troops out of the south. (Background Essay Paragraph 5) When Hayes took union troops from the south he was ending the
Read More
What Were the Key Issues Leading To the Civil War?
2033 Words | 5 Pages
Madaras, Larry, and James M. SoRelle. Issue 14 “Was Slavery the Key Issue in the Sectional Conflict Leading to the Civil War?." Taking Sides. 13th ed. Dubuque, IA: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2009. 310-329. Print.
Read More
American History: 1800s and Up
1257 Words | 3 Pages
Breen, T.H., H.W. Brands, et al. America: Past and Present. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson, Print.
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

The Compromise of 1850: A Temporary Solution

Sectional Compromises In The 19th Century

The Differences between the North and South on the Eve of the Civil War

Analysis of The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun

The Breakup of the Union

Was The Reconstruction A Success Or A Failure