Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The death of King Arthur
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The death of King Arthur
“Arthur himself, our renowned King, was mortally wounded and was carried off to the Isle of Avalon, so that his wounds might be attended to,” records Geoffrey of Monmouth in his The History of the Kings of Britain (261). Geoffrey, a twelfth century cleric, writes this line detailing the mystical disappearance of his most popular figure, King Arthur, from historical recollection. Using liberally both established historical writers before him—such as Nennius, Bede, and Gildas—and other mysteriously hinted at sources, Geoffrey attempts to fashion a tale that will provide a history for the island of Britain and her people, the Britons. It is patterned after the style of romance literature, a popular trend increasing in influence at the time, and is crowned with Geoffrey’s tragic figure of King Arthur (Gransden 186). King Arthur provides Geoffrey the element of a war-like, fiercely individual hero needed for his historical work. Arthur enabled Geoffrey to achieve his own personal purposes in writing the history and to generate an energizing character of national identity for the Britons, who is celebrated and remembered even today. Though Arthur has been proven to function as a literary character more than a historical figure in Geoffrey’s The History of the Kings of Britain, he is still a crucial element in this account that retells and reinvents the medieval past of Britain.
The history of Geoffrey of Monmouth, like that of his renowned King Arthur, is one filled with shadows and gaps, adding to the questions surrounding his writings. Nothing at all is known about his early life, and a birth date of about 1100 is considered more of an educated guess than a hard fact (Loomis 72). The identity “Geoffrey of Monmouth” has been construct...
... middle of paper ...
... Britons a source of hope and racial unity. Without his renowned King Arthur and his legendary tale of heroic deeds, Geoffrey of Monmouth would not have become an important portion of the development of English literature, and the Britons would not have their “once and future king.”
Works Cited
Geoffrey. The History of the Kings of Britain. Trans. Lewis G. M. Thorpe. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966. Print.
Gillingham, John. “The Context and Purposes of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of Britain,” Anglo-Norman Studies 13 (1990).
Gransden, A., Historical Writing in England c. 550–c. 1307 (London, 1974).
Loomis, Roger Sherman, ed. Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages: A Collaborative History. Oxford: Clarendon, 1959. Print.
Nennius. British History and The Welsh Annals. Ed. John Morris. Vol. 8. London: Phillimore, 1980. Print. Arthurian Period Sources.
- - - The New Penguin Atlas of Medieval History. London, England, Penguin Books, no publication
The world of Arthurian literature is filled with magic and adventure that enchants readers of all ages. T.H. White has done a fantastic job of turning the childhood adventures of Arthur by turning his narrative into spellbinding, cartoon like interpretation of the sword in the stone legend. Moral values are apparent from the beginning of White’s novel. White has cleverly connected all the educational adventures of Arthur, along with the people and animals encountered to the pulling the sword out of the stone. This marvelous amalgamation of key elements not only ties the loose ends of Arthur’s adventures together, they also solidify the reasoning behind Arthurs’ predetermined path to becoming the king of England.
The Arthurian cycle shows a sporadic awareness of the impossibility of mere humans fulfilling all the ideals that Arthur and his court represent. The story of Lancelot and Guenevere, Merlin's imprisonment by Nimu‘, and numerous other instances testify to the recognition of this tension between the real and the unrealistic.
King Arthur is a great mystery debated throughout the centuries. There have been several films and texts that attempt to reveal the truth about King Arthur. Arthur Pendragon, son of Uther Pendragon, was once the king of Britain and the founder of the Knights of the Round Table. Coghlan outlines that Arthur is present in many different traditions throughout centuries (Coghlan, 1995). In the 12th century, Geoffrey of Monmouth told of Arthur as a great king who defeated barbarians by the dozens. Coghlan also mentions Malory as “the standard ‘history’ of Arthur” (Coghlan, 1995). As there are various texts that tell Arthur’s origin and his legend, this essay will focus on one of the more prominent texts, The Death of King Arthur by Peter Ackroyd.
Malory, Thomas, and Keith Baines.Malory's Le morte d'Arthur: King Arthur and the legends of the Round Table. 1962. Reprint, New York: New American Library, 2010.
To tarnish Arthur’s image of perfection demands a closer inspection at where his story begins. For those familiar with Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur, it is common knowledge that Arthur was a child begotten by means of adultery when his father, Uther Pendragon, disguised himself with magic...
Stenton, Frank Merry. William the Conqueror and the Rule of the Normans. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1908. Web. 24 Feb. 2012.
When Chretien de Troyes began his first Arthurian Romance, Erec et Enid, around 1170, the Arthurian legend had already spread throughout Western Europe, told by crusading armies in the Middle East. It is important to note that not only was the popularity of the Arthurian complex already a pan-European phenomenon, but the lines of communication between its courtly Franco-Norman audiences and its native Welsh sources were already well-established (Parker). Chretien is described as a poet, with an inferred clerical background, whose Arthurian projects were sponsored by the Houses of Champagne and Flanders, nominal vassals of the king of France. Hi...
Jami Ake. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 , Vol. 43, No. 2, Tudor and Stuart Drama (Spring, 2003) , pp. 375-394
There are a multitude of events and rulers that generated an influence on England before the 1200s. The topics discussed will be centered on a similar time period, but assisted in the heightening of England’s power as a country. As a result, England becomes a potent country, and runs along with many other powerhouses at the time. Without the Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxons, and William the Conqueror, England would not have developed and flourished well into the 1200s. Several results of these pivotal events include becoming the most powerful monarchy in Western Europe, compiling the greatest governmental system in Western Europe, and modifying the English language and culture, while distancing themselves from the French.
Ardrey, Adam. Finding Arthur: The Truth Behind the Legend of the Once and Future King.
...er, Geoffrey. ""Prologue" to The Canterbury Tales." England in Literature. Eds. John Pfordrester, et.al. Inglewood Cliffs: Foresman, 1972.
Roger Babusci et al. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1994. 115-136. Print. “The Medieval Period: 1066-1485.”
Gascoigne, Bamber. "HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN (from 1707)." History World. (2001): n. page. Print. .
Geoffrey of Monmouth, the author famous for being credited with the Legend of King Arthur, also created his own theory on Stonehenge, his theory is known as the “Merlin Theory” (1). According to Geoffrey, the giants who first colonized Ireland brought the stones from their original home in Africa to Mount Killaraus for their miraculous virtues. In the 5th century AD, Aurelius Ambrosius, a half-real, half-mythical king of Britain, sent Merlin, Uther Pendragon (King Arthur’s father) and 15,000 knights to remove the stones and to place them in England on the Salisbury Plains. After a very bloody battle Merlin used his sorcery to send the stones 137 miles to the Salisbury Plains. With this theory, I find it is necessary to really look at the historical context to understand how and why Geoffrey of Monmouth ca...