The Blow That Broke The Dust Bowl

731 Words2 Pages

In 1936, the United States Department of Agriculture released a documentary entitled The Plow that Broke the Plains. The film, a poignant attempt to explain the tragedy of the Dust Bowl, was written and directed by Pare Lorentz, marking his first foray into filmmaking. With the narrative style of a jeremiad, lamenting the ills befalling America's Great Plains. The film also serves as a cautionary tale, warning of potential environmental disasters (Campbell) if farming practices remain unchanged. The film's controversial nature won international acclaim and criticism of being 'libelous' to America's farmers. Why do you need to be a member? To begin with, the film paints an idealistic portrait of the Native American population living in harmony …show more content…

We see close-up shots of the land being broken by plows and other pieces of equipment. No wonder the film is controversial! Much like demonizing a gun when it is people who shoot people in a highly simplistic way to view a serious issue, Lorentz blames inanimate objects. It is also insulting to its audience. Second, how did governmental policies add to this disaster? Farmers, from 1914 to 1929, were encouraged to grow wheat and other grain crops on the Great Plains. The film shows that the Great War needed America's farmers to produce food to feed America and Europe. After America entered the war, it became even more critical and patriotic. to grow food to feed our troops and the troops of our allies. In one scene of the film, Americans are promised that "one crop" will be enough to pay off a farm. Rising agricultural prices due to the Great War are a financial windfall for Great Plains and would-be farmers. When the war ended, returning troops were encouraged to become farmers by governmental policies, enabling them to get cheap land for farming on the Plains. Finally, over-farming and irresponsible land management practices lead to the disaster shown in the …show more content…

The symbolism is that agricultural machinery can be as destructive as war machinery. What are the facts about this? In 1900, the average American farmer represented 41% of America's population. He fed just three to five people. It was a family farm. In 2000, America's farmers represented just 1.9% of our population, but each farmer feeds approximately 166 people at home and abroad (Fast Facts About Agriculture & Food). The mechanization of America's farms came after the start of the Industrial Revolution. Still, it needed to happen for America to compete in the world markets and become one of the world's greatest economies. In short, farmers need to produce more. To allow this to happen, the American farmers needed government support, including New Deal programs. The government was morally responsible for educating American farmers on environmentally sound land management and conservation techniques. The fact that neither occurred for the most part led to the results we see in the film. It is patently unfair and simplistic to blame Great Plains farmers and their machinery for the Dust

More about The Blow That Broke The Dust Bowl

Open Document