The Beauty Of Platitude By Laurie Fennedrich Analysis

637 Words2 Pages

In the article “ The Beauty of the Platitude” by Laurie Fendrich, Fendrich explains to readers how she feels about the use of platitudes in writing and when speaking. Her choices of techniques were very effective as far as making her point. She also provides a sufficient amount of evidence to support her claim. Fendrich explains that platitudes are overused and should not be used in conversation. She describes them as “meaningless clumps of words”. Laurie Fendrich uses examples that appeal to readers and strong metaphors to illustrate her stance on the use of platitudes. Fendrich uses many examples of platitudes to help readers understand what a platitude is and why they shouldn’t be used. In paragraph one, line 8, she says “ Just as greetings like “Hello” are conversations starters, platitudes like “Life is a process of change,” or the one that’s particularly grating to me as an artist- “ Art is a form of communication”- are conversation stoppers.” In paragraph 2, line 1, Fendrich even goes on to say, “ For the educated who are on call 24/7 to be as clever and quick-witted as possible to be caught using a platitude is as embarrassing as making a grammatical error.” Fendrich uses these examples to convince readers that using platitudes in writing or speakers can make readers come …show more content…

She uses strong metaphors in the first paragraph when trying to express how meaningless and bare platitudes are now. In paragraph 1, line 8, she says “ Platitudes assert everything –and nothing- all at once. Because they’ve been uttered so many times previously, and in so many trivial conversations, they tend to arrive stillborn, no more than a clump of meaningless words.” Fendrich states that platitudes are as lifeless as a stillborn baby. She goes further and says, “Their form stiff and unbendable by nature, permits little if any wiggle room for play.” She makes it clear that platitudes are lifeless, boring, and

Open Document