The Banning of Smoking in Public Facilities

693 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Smoking ban in public places

The Banning of Smoking in Public Facilities

Thesis: Smoking in most public facilities should be banned.

I. Smoking is very unhealthy for you.

A. Smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in America.

B. About 3 million people die each year from diseases that result from

using tobacco products.

C. Tobacco contains over 4,000 chemicals most are poisons.

II. Not only is it unhealthy to you it is extremely unhealthy to others.

A. 53,000 non-smoking Americans die annually from inhaling other

people?s smoke.

B. There are many diseases you can get from second hand smoke.

C. You get stains on clothes and you smell really bad when you have been

around it for a long period of time.

III. What can you do to change things?

A. Let people know smoke bothers you.

B. Send an action e-mail or letter to a higher power.

C. If you smoke do not do it inside a public facility.

Smoking should be banned from most public facilities. The reason I say most is because I do not believe it should be banned from bars because of the fact you a...

Show More
Related

  • PSY 301, Introductory Psychology, 2004, Exam 3

    3583 Words  | 8 Pages

    b. He would categorize her as anal expulsive and claim that it is due to unresolved issues she had during her anal stage of life.

    Read More

  • On Being A Cripple, And 'On Dumpster Diving' By Nancy Mairs

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    really counts is having clothes on your back, not at brand it is. Both stories had where the

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography: Cigarette Smoking Bans

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    Renneboog, R. M. (2016). Cigarette Smoking Bans: An Overview. Canadian Points Of View: Cigarette Smoking Bans, 1.

    Read More

  • Countess Elizabeth Bathory of Hungary

    452 Words  | 1 Pages

    B. Such experiences resulted in seizures that were believed at that time to make her neurotic.

    Read More

  • The Appeal Of The Androgynous Man

    434 Words  | 1 Pages

    experience with men, not by the experience of women as a whole. Gross is making a

    Read More

  • Gonorrhea

    473 Words  | 1 Pages

    during sexual contact. These bacteria can infect the genital tract, the mouth, and the rectum. It

    Read More

  • A Consideration of Public Policy to Reduce Smoking

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    in only a few years time we will notice a drastic decline in the total

    Read More

  • Smoking Bans

    1478 Words  | 3 Pages

    Smoking tobacco has long been an accepted form of recreational drug use despite a history of flip-flops of public opinion. The negative effects of smoking were not thought of or even known until the early 1900’s. (“Introduction to Smoking”) Over the last few decades there has been an ever increasing surge in the United States and all over the world to ban smoking in public places. The goals of these smoking bans are to prevent the numerous diseases and health complications that are produced from exposure to the toxic smoke and to improve the overall health of society. Some disagree with these motives by claiming that smoking bans have not actually saved any lives or prevented people from taking up the habit. Contrarily, global research now actually shows that smoking tobacco kills people both directly and indirectly; indirectly, of course, referring to second-hand smoke. Another argument against these smoking bans is that a number of people feel as though they infringe upon their individual rights. These people believe they have a right to smoke tobacco anywhere they choose; not unlike many people who also believe they have a right to avoid forced exposure to deadly second-hand smoke. One might wonder which of the two takes precedence. Another very important thing to consider is while these smoking bans may appear to have a good intent they present to society a difficult scenario if imposed and maintained; they threaten to set a precedent for the restriction of other freedoms that humanity may take for granted. Smoking bans may be justifiable but, like many other prominent moral dilemmas, it may take centuries if not millennia to satisfactorily answer the questions brought forth by the issue.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Smoking

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Smoking has become a big epidemic in the United States. As a tobacco free person, I want to be able to breathe clean air anywhere I go. As we know, smoking can harm every organ in the body (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). I believe that smoking should be banned in public places such as drinking establishments, hospitals, buses, train stations, and restaurants. Not only does smoking affect the individual smoker, it also causes a number of health problems, increases death rate, and it affects not only the lives, but the health of other people around them. On the contrary, smoking should be banned in public areas for these reasons.

    Read More

  • Cigarettes Should be Illegal

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the largest and most problematic health issues in our society is smoking. Smoking is currently the leading cause of death in our country, due to its harmful and addictive contents, such as nicotine and tobacco. Although millions die from it each year, smoking is the single most preventable cause of death. Without smoking, a tremendous amount of money and lives will be saved. I think that our country should ban smoking and the production of cigarettes in order to maintain a healthier nation, help save the environment, and prevent the almost 1000 deaths that they cause in fires each year.

    Read More

  • A Proposal to Ban Smoking in Public Areas

    1117 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every year, there are over 400,000 smoking-related deaths in the United States. A large percentage of these are due to lung cancer, whose leading cause is smoking. However, not all deaths are smokers themselves. Anyone in the vicinity can fall victim to second hand smoke. These people, through no action of their own, can have their lives threatened.

    Read More

  • Banning Cigarettes

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    This year alone cigarettes will kill over 420,000 Americans, and many more will suffer from cancers, and circulatory and respiratory system diseases. These horrible illnesses were known to come from cigarettes for years. Recently the Food and Drug Administration declared nicotine, the main chemical in cigarettes, addictive. This explains why smokers continue to use cigarettes even though smokers are aware of the constantly warned about health dangers in cigarettes. Some researchers have also found out that smoking by pregnant women causes the deaths of over 5,000 babies and 115,000 miscarriages. The only way to get rid of the suffering and loss of life by cigarettes is to ban them. . For years cigarettes have been known to cause cancer, emphysema, and other horrible illnesses. The deaths of over 420,000 of Americans this year will be do to cigarettes. With all the other causes of deaths, alcohol, illegal drugs, AIDS, suicide, transportation accidents, fires, and guns, cigarettes still count for more deaths than those do combined. We can’t stand and watch people die because they smoke cigarettes. Thousands of smokers try to rid themselves of cigarettes but can't because of additive nicotine. Nicotine was recently declared addictive by the Food and Drug Administration, which explains why many smokers continue to smoke despite the health warnings on cigarette smoking. Nicotine makes it almost impossible for cigarette smokers to quit smoking because of its addictive nature, and with the cigarette manufacturers putting just enough nicotine in the so they cant be outlawed. The benefits of outlawing cigarettes greatly outnumber the disadvantages, for example, many scientists believe a link between smoking and a shortened life span exists between the two, a ban on cigarettes could increase life spans. Many studies suggest that billions of dollars now spent on smoking related. Smoking related illnesses could be reduced by outlawing cigarettes, families could save money by not purchasing cigarettes, and accidental fires costing millions of dollars caused by cigarettes would stop. Although a complete ban on cigarettes currently remains almost impossible, several organizations recently helped create a bill that could control cigarettes much in the same way the government now controls drugs. One such organization, the Food and Drug Administration, headed by David Kesslar drafted a major part, which would require manufacturers to disclose the 700 chemical additives in cigarettes, reduce the level of harmful chemicals, require cigarette companies to warn of the addictive nicotine, restrict tobacco advertising and promotion, and control the level of nicotine cigarettes contain.

    Read More

  • Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many restaurant and bar owners think that the ban will decrease business, but a counter-argument to this is that only twenty percent of the city's population are smokers, and when the smoking ban is in place, the other eighty percent will go out to bars and restaurants, dramatically increasing business. There are many different opposing arguments to banning smoking, and the debate will probably never end. Smoking should be banned in public places because, although some may argue that it infringes on their freedom, smoking is replete with harmful substances. People should be able to frequent bars and restaurants without the fear of experiencing an asthma attack or developing lung disease. Everyone deserves the freedom to live and breathe without restriction.

    Read More

  • Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

    1127 Words  | 3 Pages

    Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places. Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere. from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet.

    Read More

  • The Ban on Smoking in Public Places

    444 Words  | 1 Pages

    Those opposing a smoking ban say that freedom of choice would be affected by such legislation. Some people against a ban say that smoking bans damage business. A smoking ban could lead to a significant fall in earnings from bars, restaurants and casinos. Another argument is that the smoker has a basic human right to smoke in public places, and the ban is a limitation for smokers’ rights. Businesses, smokers, publicans, tobacco industries, stars, and some of the non-smokers oppose public smoking ban. Smokers light a cigarette because they need to smoke, not because they want it, because nicotine is physically addictive. Therefore, some smokers think that the public smoking ban is oppressiveness. They see the ban as a treatment to smokers as second-class citizens. Smokers agree that the smoking ban benefits the world, but cannot support the ban, because effects of nicotine obstruct them.

    Read More

More about The Banning of Smoking in Public Facilities

Open Document