The Australian Curriculum: A Critical Analysis

1937 Words4 Pages

The Australian Curriculum is fluid, ever-changing and highly politicised. There is constant debate surrounding what should, and should not be taught in Australian schools. The Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) Curriculum in particular, has undergone dramatic changes over the last few years. This essay will critically analyse two provocations relating to the HASS 7-10 curriculum, and some of the surrounding issues that HASS teachers contend with on a day to day basis. The first provocation, the purpose of Civics and Citizenship teaching is to teach about democracy, not for democracy, will be examined in relation to opinions regarding left-wing bias in the Civics and Citizenship curriculum, and the idea that the course teaches too much ‘for’ …show more content…

While acknowledging that an opinion piece in a newspaper, is not necessarily a reliable source, it is an example some public opinions, in relation to the updated curriculum. The Age article goes on to argue that while the course covers critical values like democracy, and the rule of law they are “skewed sharply to the left” (Berg, 2012), because it includes specifically leftist agenda such as climate change, environmentalism and sustainability . This opinion appears to be of the view that Civics and Citizenship should teach about democracy, not for democracy, as this particular version of the curriculum teaches for democracy, only if it is a left-wing democracy. A more rational approach to this debate can be found in Tudball and Gordon’s work, who say that the issues criticised as leftist, like global warming, financial instability and environmental degradation, are the issues that are going to affect young people’s future wellbeing (Tudball & Gordon, 2014). Isn’t it fitting then, that they are included in the Civics and Citizenship course? However, if there is such a debate over whether teaching for democracy is too highly politicised, the purpose of the course should then be to teach about democracy. Therefore students will be aware …show more content…

6). Smart phones equipped with GPS and apps such as Google maps, make skills like mapping and coordinates unnecessary and irrelevant to students who have grown up with this technology. Suggestions to combat this issue while still making Geography a mandatory learning area, include “Teachers who keep their knowledge and skills current” “Teachers who embrace and are confident to utilize new technology” and “Students understanding the relevance of what they are learning to themselves and others” (Erebus International, 2008, p. 6). These sorts of ideas portray some of the issues that secondary HASS teachers contend with on a day to day

Open Document