The Audit Of Accounts Payable Case Study

1133 Words3 Pages

Case 6-29
The Audit of Accounts Payable uncovered many deficiencies in the sufficiency and appropriateness of the evidence gathered, as it relates to Grande Stores. Before analysing each account, it should be noted that evidence acquired by an auditor should be persuasive enough, whereby any competent auditor would believe that no material misstatements exists. As Grande Stores is expanding, the auditor should adjust their audit risk, as there may now be a greater potential for fraud and error to take place.
McClure Advertising Credits
The first problem poses many deficiencies in the audit process. To start off with, it is not sufficient enough to take a sample size of only four test documents when over 1,100 vendors exist. If an error was able to be detected in only four test documents, than the auditor should have expanded their sample size to ensure that no actual material misstatements existed. The auditors claim that the amount was not material, but because the sample size was so small they could not make an accurate judgement. The second problem occurred when the auditor accepted phone confirmations and internally generated documents such as cash receipts to confirm that the sample material was correct. This evidence should not be accepted, because the reliability of the evidence is flawed. The best type of confirmation that the auditor could have received would have been written confirmations from the external parties. Looking at this situation, the auditor should have made a professional judgement call to determine if the evidence received was persuasive enough for him to make an accurate determination on the accuracy of the Accounts Payable. With such a small sample size, the auditor is taking on too much audit risk, and ...

... middle of paper ...

...ment made showing gratitude to the accountants that provided review services for the business since its date of incorporation.

e. Since it is the PA firm’s responsibility to conduct audits, it is a public accountant’s objective to adhere to CAS 200 whereby their objectives are to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are not misstated, consider the possibility of fraud or error and communicate finding in accordance with the Canadian Auditing Standards. Public Accountants are only required to provide a reasonable level of assurance when auditing financial statements. The users of the financial statements may vary. They may be shareholders, creditors or management, but the only responsibility the shareholder has, is to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements present fairly and in accordance to a certain criteria such as GAAP.

Open Document