The Argument for the Existence of God
It is an undisputed fact that some people claim to have experienced
God. It is these religious experiences that have been used by
philosophers to argue for the existence of God. The main way of
expressing the argument from religious experience is as follows:
P1 Someone experiences an entity
C1 The entity exists
P2 Someone has experienced God
C2 God exists
Those who champion the argument seek to differentiate ordinary
experiences and religious experiences. The supporters of this argument
argue that there are several key differences between the two types of
experience: that religious experiences are completely different from
what is normal and usual; that it is not usual to be able to describe
a religious experience; religious experience cannot usually be checked
(i.e. someone else cannot check to see whether it has happened or
not); and it gives insight into the unseen.
All religious experiences take the form of either 'a sense of oneness
or union with the divine', 'a sense of dependence on the divine' and
'a sense of separateness from the divine'. All of these are to do with
direct experience and this is what the topic of religious experience
is debated on.
When people claim to have had a religious experience, it can usually
be categorised by being non-inferential, being experienced through one
or more of the five senses and being something like the way that you
would experience people. Language used to describe these experiences
is often linked with the sense such as 'seeing' and 'meeting' God;
this is to show that the experience is personal and shows that you
have e...
... middle of paper ...
...a spiritual experience. Believers do
not think that this is a major criticism, however, because they argue
this simply proves that God designed humans with an ability to receive
religious experiences.
The argument that the existence of God can be proved by religious
experience relies on the assumption that the experience itself can
give some sort of guarantee that you are right. In conclusion, I
believe that is hard to believe in an argument that does not and
cannot distinguish between feeling that something is right and
actually being right. This is emphasised even more when we consider
that nearly every human has, at one point in their life, been sure
about something and then they have consequently been proved wrong. It
is this misplaced optimism in subjectivity that makes believe that
this argument has failed.
Most people want to be normal. The definition of normal however, depends on the culture of the person making the judgment. Far too often, normal is defined in America by looking at the actions and beliefs of the average white middle class family. This definition of normal fails to let other cultures to be accepted, creating distance and misunderstanding.
Just following the ant in front of us, and everyone looking the same as the next. Not having any of there own ideas or thoughts of what to do and how to do it. Some people are what you may call "normal", some are depressed, some are mentally ill, and some are just plain old crazy. In the book One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, written by Ken Kesey, the author shows how people can act so differently and have different ways of dealing with their problems. The story is narrated by Chief Bromden who is thought to be deaf and dumb.
begin with. This we call God, so we call God the prime mover i.e. the
God sees all that happens to us why does he not help us? God loves us
To conclude, I have only lived for eighteen years, so I don't feel that I can be the judge of what is normal or not. I can only go by my own environment until I explore the "normality" of other societies or cultures. Everyone has their own opinion as to what is normal and what isn't, when really they are just stereotyping what they are not familiar with. No matter what is said people will still draw their own conclusions and continue to judge others that are foreign to them. That is the main reason I support a diverse classroom like this course offers.
The Design Argument For The Existence Of God This argument is also called the teleological argument, it argues that the universe did not come around by mere chance, but some one or something designed it. This thing was God. This argument is a prosteriori because the observation of the natural world is taken into the mind to conclude that there is a designer. The belief that the universe was designed by God was triggered by things like the four seasons; summer, spring, autumn and winter, that change through the year.
Saleem states that he’s seen in statistics that normal maybe seen in color and gender. Which in a way are very many schools and jobs use “normal views.” We know that reviewers will find more spelling errors in your writing if they think you're black. We know that professors are less likely to help female or minority students.And we know that resumes with white-sounding names get more callbacks than resumes with black-sounding names.” Why do we, use the norm to see the “difference” in people that have. Different in a way is good to be around, you get to learn new cultures and new ways of life. So why is normal so judged? Well “ Because of our expectations of what is normal.” (Saleem 2016) our expectations are what we see as the norm is, which is what we live around. “But studies also show that discrimination of this kind, in most cases, is simply favoritism, and it results from more from wanting to help people that you can relate to than the desire to harm people that you can't relate to.” (Saleem 2016) What if we don’t mean the norm in people? We need to start becoming one and enjoy each other's differences.
Everyone looks for something greater than themselves, and most people find it in their spiritual life. But for many people it is hard for them to believe in a God, or a superior being because of their selfish desires. Peter Kreeft, a professor of philosophy, has written an article the “Twenty Arguments for the Existence of God” in which he states 20 arguments that prove the existence of God. One of his main arguments is the Argument of Desire which says that everyone has a desire for some real object that satisfies us. But in us there is a desire which nothing in time, on earth, and no creature can satisfy. Because of this there must be something more than time, earth and creatures that can satisfy our desire.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument is an a priori argument. The arguments attempt to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselm's classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes.
Outlining the Ontological Arguments and Their Success as Proofs of God's Existence. The ontological argument is a perfect example of a priori argument. For example, it uses logic to prove an initial definition to be. correct.
that the same can be said for the universe as a whole. It seems to
God can be defined as a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions (1). There are many people that do not believe in any religion. People who do not believe in a religion have no reason for believing in a God. People who do not believe in a God and argue against the existence of God are proving something that is completely false. There is a God for numerous reasons.
the first cause. He did not have to be caused as he was always there.
One of the most obvious things that we are noticing in our everyday lives is that people are distinctly different. There are 7 billion people sharing the earth. But how many are considered “normal”? When are people considered abnormal? To be normal is to adhere to a standard or norm, but unfortunately, normality is an impossible and unlikely dream that we will continue to strive for all our lives. We strive for it because it gives us that sense of self that we need to reassure us that we fit in. While undefined, depending on your upbringing, generation and culture, what you consider normal may not be normal for someone else because other countries and cultures have different traditions and practices that they view to be routine; and what in the past has been viewed as normal has evolved throughout the course of time.
... God and how He is related to us – how powerful He is to make everything in this world works; how He made everything almost perfect for us. I have also learned that believing He exist, makes me understand more about His existence, just like what St. Anselm said. I believe that believing He exists, is what makes Him exist. For me, Yes, God really exist.