The American Cancer Society: Glyphosate Analysis

681 Words2 Pages

When it comes to herbicides the most conversational topic is the effects of the herbicide on human health. The American Cancer Society has glyphosate as a member of their Probable Carcinogen (meaning it could be cancerous) list, where the statement was last medical review in 2014, and was last revisited in 2016 but not medically tested (American Cancer Society, 2016). This is the proof that backs up the statement the Ecology Action Centre (2016), an organization located in Halifax, Nova Scotia, whose goals are to build a sustainable future, used as a main point to advocate against the use of glyphosate in Nova Scotia’s Forests. A study done in Changwon, South Korea by Dr. Young Kim (2014), shows that glyphosate is nothing to fear, as his patients …show more content…

Glyphosate falls under the probable category, meaning that they have height belief that is product can do harm to the human body. The federal government is using the precautionary principle to allow the justification to use glyphosate as a herbicide in the open market. The precautionary principle is the the decision method of deciding if the benefits are worth the consequences, stating that nothing is worth risking everything. Because this is also dealing with the federal government O’Riordan (1994) states that these decision are based off more political background than scientific. Comparing the benefits that glyphosate can give to the nation based of economic value, compared to the consequences of human life at risk, the principle only plays into effect if each side is plausible. Because of the negative side effects are only show that the American Cancer Society think it can probably cause of cancer, and Dr. Kim study of 2 of 153 of his patients dying from an oral intake of the herbicide in South Korea, does not give enough evidence to take glyphosate off the market. The federal government of Canada is still doing tests on glyphosate to determine its safety, but currently states that it has little potential to harm citizen’s health (Thompson,2011). Where glyphosate may not harm human in the health department, concerned Canadians are

More about The American Cancer Society: Glyphosate Analysis

Open Document