Susanna's Moodie

1996 Words4 Pages

One particular connection between Susanna’s Moodie and Atwood’s Moodie is the use of language. Although the subject of language comes up in considerably different ways, language is still an important theme in both pieces of work. Susanna Moodie’s Roughing it in the Bush is meant as a means by which to convey her animosity towards the land agents. These land agents convinced her, and many English people alike, to emigrate and give up life in England in favour of a life of supposed riches in Canada. Once moved, the English people would come to notice that life in Canada was not all it was claimed to have been. There were certainly no riches. On the contrary, life was completely different and required dedication to sustain life. Moodie, through …show more content…

For example, Susanna’s Moodie discusses her sentiments towards her new living arrangements when she says it was, “a feeling very nearly allied to that which the condemned criminal entertains for his cell--his only hope for escape being through the portals of the grave” (Moodie, 124). After discussing the tinkling brook and how (even to a small degree) advantageous their new homestead was, Moodie compares her experience to that of a criminal in a jail cell. She finds joy in her new home and moments later she names herself a criminal whose only way of escaping her punishment is through death (in that very home or cell). These are both strong claims, and because of that it is easy to see here how divided down the middle Moodie is. Her divided mind arose from her perceptions of romance to reality. Moodie romanticizes all that is around her, but then comes back to note the reality of the situation she is living in. So, in this case, she romanticized the sounds of the brook and the advantages of her settlement, and then she brings herself back to her cold, adverse Canadian reality. Susanna’s Moodie goes through conflicting emotions in her head. She is in a constantly confused as to whether she loves the place or detests …show more content…

For instance, Atwood’s Moodie concerns herself with the idea that the trees are conspiring against her. She claims that she hears, “malice in the trees’ whispers” (Atwood, 819). Although she hears these hostile whispers, she is still interested in understanding that very nature that she believes is conspiring against her. This is where the idea of paranoid schizophrenia comes in. When Atwood makes the claim that Moodie, “[needs] wolf’s eyes to see” (Atwood, 819). In simpler terms, Atwood is saying that you have to become the things you fear in order to understand them. In a sense, Moodie is attempting to make her fears a part of her, and by becoming one with wilderness she is trying to become superior to it. Why would you want to understand something you detest, fear, and believe is conspiring against you? The answer is simple. It is because Moodie is a paranoid schizophrenic. Another perfect example is in Atwood’s Thoughts from Underground. When Atwood’s Moodie is discussing her feelings concerning Canada she claims that, “I felt I ought to love/ this country/I said I loved it/ and my mind saw double” (Atwood, 822). This quote hardly needs explaining because her divided thoughts are very apparent. She feels like she is obligated to love this country and when she said she loved it, her mind responded by seeing both sides. Both these sides would be extreme opposites and Moodie’s mind would see the appeal of each. There are

Open Document