Survival In George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four

938 Words2 Pages

Humans are born with the ability to acquire language, expressly for the purpose of survival. Among groups of hunter-gatherers, this behaviour, called the “Language Instinct” by socio-biologist Steven Pinker, was necessary to facilitate cooperation in society. In George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the repressive government of the nation of Oceania implements a program of language reforms, ending in an ideologically pure language, Newspeak. Along with the changes in language comes a change in the challenges that language addresses. Instead of the requisite social cooperation of ancient hunter-gatherers, members of the Party need a form of communication that allows them to serve the Party and its leader, Big Brother, because the party …show more content…

A police state is set up so that thought itself is controlled; people did not worry about other people, but rather their own thoughts. Of all the state organs, “only the Thought Police mattered.” (2) This results in a society where perfect orthodoxy is a requirement for survival. Newspeak not only makes it harder for people to rebel against their oppressive government, it actually makes it easier for people to survive, as Newspeak would “make all other modes of thought impossible.” (174) As people would no longer have to fear their own thoughts, survival would be aided by …show more content…

Newspeak is an evolution of language by eliminating superfluous words and grammatical rules. The German Language underwent government changes in 2007, simplifying the language’s over complicated grammatical rules significantly (Blechman). German was an exceedingly hard language to learn, due to rules “deemed ambiguous and unsystematic” (Blechman). The number of convoluted grammatical rules was halved, and rules “governing commas dropped from 52 to a mere nine.” While these rules required a one-year period of adjustment, they resulted in an “easier” language, but also one with less ambiguity and more meaning. Modern English may have these problems as well, argues British Journalist John Humphrys, due to modern politicians polluting it with meaningless words and phrases. This is eliminated in Newspeak, as all words are “ so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to

Open Document