Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's rights in christianity and islam
Women's rights in christianity and islam
Women's rights in christianity and islam
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women's rights in christianity and islam
Now more than ever the Muslim faith is being put into the spotlight. America continues attempts at banning 7 Muslim majority countries from entering the country. With all this negative publicity, there has been an increase in hate crimes towards Muslim people. It is often hard to tell a person’s faith just by their appearance. However, women who practice Islam are required to wear veils which cover their hair. By wearing the veil these women are susceptible to hate crimes since they can be identified as practicing Muslims. Additionally, in the Western society the women who wear the veil are often seen as oppressed. Homa Hoodfara, a professor at Concordia University, discusses the Western Societies’ views on veiled Muslim women in her article The Veil in their Minds and On Our Heads: The Persistence of Colonial Images of Muslim Women. In this article Homa discusses the negative interpretation that the Western society has on the veil. She also explains how these negative views contribute to prejudice views and the discrimination of veiled women. Lastly, Homa tries to explain how veiled Muslim women and women in general living in the Western society both suffer from female oppression. …show more content…
Due to this fact, multiple restrictions were placed on the wife’s actions and behaviors, also these restrictions were stricter with wealthy families (Hoodfar, n.d.). However, poorer families did not exhibit these same strict restrictions since all women were required to work. Homa also explains how the veiling of Muslim women initially began as an indication of a woman’s social status. Due to this then veil becames a cultural, or social practice, that was adopted by Muslims and was perpetuated for the most part for financial purposes” (Haniffa, p.65). The veil also allowed families to delegate the distribution of their wealth via marriage and
For some women wearing a veil is not something that is forced on them but rather a choice of their own. Martha Nussbaum and Maysan Haydar are both authors that try to explain their reasoning that veiling isn't an oppressive tool used against women. Martha Nussbaum's article “Veiled Threats”, is a political and philosophical take on why banning the burqa is a violation of human rights. On the other hand Maysan Haydar’s article “Don’t Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering”, is a more humorous and personal take on why veiling shouldn't be as judged or stereotyped. Though Nussbaum and Haydar have equal goals this essay is being used to understand the main argument, claims and whether or not each article has any weaknesses.
Being open about sexuality is usually seen as a women’s freedom or liberation, while the veil is seen as something that rejects freedom or liberation. Though some would argue that it allows the women to control or sexuality. “With the rise of prostitution and growing interest in the harem within the colonies, colonizers were frustrated with immutable veiled women who made apparent their denial of sex.”(Scott 60). Thus, aids to the initial resentment toward these veil
Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving by Lila Abu-Lughod describes Western feminist beliefs on Muslim women and their burqa/veil and how focusing on these misconceptions are doing far more harm than good. This causes Western feminists reduce the culture and beliefs of Muslim women down to a single piece of clothing. The burqa is a type of veil worn by Muslim women for a number of reasons such as proprietary and signaling their relationship with God. The burqa is often seen a symbol of suppression amongst the Western world and it was expected for women to throw it off in a show of independence once liberated from the Taliban. The saving of Muslim women is often used to justify the “War on Terrorism” as exemplified in Laura Bush 's 2001 speech. The belief that Muslim women needed saving existed before the “War on Terrorism” as seen when Marnia Lazreg wrote about a skit where two Afghan girls talked about the beauty of the free Christian France.
Muslims, Sikhs, and many other religious affiliations have often been targeted for hate crimes, racial slurs, and misfortunate events. We are all different in our own ways some are good and some are bad yet one event changes everything for everyone affiliated with the group. The book The Politics of the Veil by Joan Scott a renowned pioneer in gender studies gives a detailed and analytical book of about the French views towards the Muslim females in France during 2004. The author talks about why the French governments official embargo of wearing conspicuous signs is mainly towards the headscarves for Muslim girls under the age of eighteen in public schools. The main themes of book are gender inequality, sexism, and cultural inequality historical schools used in the book are history of below, woman’s history, cultural history, and political history. In this essay, I will talk about why Joan Scotts argument on why the French government’s ban on wearing conspicuous signs was
The hate directed towards Muslim Australians, especially women choosing to dress in hijabs and niqabs, is unbelievable. In the experiments conducted in public showed that Muslim women are subjected the hateful slurs and hurtful comments purely based on the way they are choosing to dress based on their religion. A finding from the survey by Professor Kevin Dunn found that a substantial number of Australian citizens having ‘negative’ feelings towards those identifying as being Muslim. 31.6% of those surveyed claimed to feel negatively towards Muslim Australians. This differs greatly from the 22.4% claiming to have negative feelings towards Middle-¬‐Eastern Australians.
Fatemeh Fakhraie’s essay “Scarfing it Down,” explains how Muslim women suffer because of what they wear. Fakhraie blogs about Muslim women in her website she explains; “Seeing ourselves portrayed in the media in ways that are one-dimensional and misleading." Several people judge Muslim's by their appearance because they assume they're a bad person. The author of this essay wants the reader to know that Muslim women wearing a hijab are not a threat to the world.
Professor Leila Ahmed, active Islamic feminist, in her article “Reinventing the veil” published in the Financial Times assumes that there is a connection between “advancement” and veiling, which means that unveiled women are advanced and vice versa. In addition, she supports that it led to increasing rate of violence. She questions why women wear veil, that is considered as “symbol of patriarchy and women’s oppression”. However, research changed her position towards wearing veil. Firstly, she states that wearing veil was essential for women, because it could be beneficial and influence to how people treat women, in terms of job, marriage and free movement in public. Secondly, her assumption was explained while interviewing women, who stated
The World’s Religions by Huston Smith is a novel based on the different religions found around the world. The main area of focus within this book was to expand the knowledge of different cultures and their religions. The chapters that were specified to focus on include Islam, Judaism, Christianity and the Primal Religions. Go into detail about each religion. Smith goes into great detail about each religion, concentrating on the teachings and essential elements of each religion, important people that helped form the religion, and traditions. He specifically discusses how these three religions are very similar rather then how different they are, with the main studies on Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad. Finally he discusses the Primal Religions – meaning the traditions that are passed down through oral communication.
There are many different views towards Muslim choice of clothing especially wearing the veil. “I wear it believing it is necessary, but someone else can be wearing it believing that she is doing something extra” said Hamna Ahmed. One of the many reasons a Muslim can be wearing the veil are their own personal decisions too. Hamna has been wearing it for seven years now, despite her mother and three of her four sisters staying uncovered. Socially this causes an issue with the meaning of the veil and conflict with other groups. With many different consumptions of religion, what it means, what is considered to be practicing and what is not can lead to negative misunderstandings. Ultimately the decisions are up to the individuals although; there is likely to be misinterpretation between the meaningfulness of religion to family and society. On an even bigger scale of things this could also impact society and it...
Other Muslim women do not think that Hijab/Veils are not obligation for all Muslim Women. For example, when a young woman starts to wear Hijab her parents do not support her because her parents think that Hijab/Veils are inappropriate. Ali says, “A twenty-two year old Pakistani law student said that her "parents were very unsupportive and had an extremely hard time coping"(520). Her parents think that they are a modern family, and she supposed to take off her Hijab. This is can prove that some Muslim men do not force their wives, daughters, sisters, and mothers to wear Hijab/Veils.
To circumvent confusion, definitions and pictures of various Islamic veils (hijab, chador, niqab, and burqa) were included with the questionnaire. The items listed were meant to discover feelings of discomfort and distrust toward veils, as well as the inclination to ban it from public areas. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score the items (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The listed items: (1) “Generally, it upsets me to see the Muslim veil in certain places”; (2) “I find the fact that Muslim women wear a veil as acceptable”; (3) “It upsets me more to see a Muslim veil in public places such as schools, hospitals, or on the street”; (4) “Muslim women have the right to wear their veil anywhere they want”; (5) “When I see a Muslim veil I get nervous and/or anxious”; (6) “Muslim veils should be prohibited in certain places”.
Unfortunately, one of the most common misconceptions regarding headscarf is that it is an icon of oppression and lack of freedom. Since the September 11 terrorist attacks, western perceptions of Muslims and Islam have caused much confusion and debate. “Visible Muslim minorities, such as women who practice headscarf, are at the center of misinterpretations associated with the faith while the western world is learning more about Islam” (Khosroshahi n.p.). Some believe that women are commanded by their fathers or husbands or even bro...
Society’s view on Islam has always been very different from the values that we have instilled in our day to day lives, however it has caused our norm to be abnormal to the people we associate with on a daily basis. Women who wear the hijab find it very difficult to fit into society, as there is a fabricated perception on what Islam is. Considering that I was born and raised in Canada, I would have never acknowledged the fact that I would be looked at differently for something I chose to do for God. I began to feel excluded from the Canadian culture, as others began to look at me as if I was not Canadian at all. Despite the fact that many people have been accustomed to sharing their community with other cultures and religions, there are many who convinced themselves that Muslims are the stereotypes of what others make us to be.
Within the chapter ‘size 6: The Western Women’s Harem’, Fatema Mernissi analyzed the depiction and relegation of women from both the perspective of a Muslim woman and from that of a Western woman. Mernissi disputed that the subordination and suppression of Western women by their own society, more specifically men, are more insensitive and overall worse than the general depiction of Muslim women. Her reasoning revolved around the idea that Muslim women are perceived as more repressed because they wear a veil, among the plethora of other constraints on women in Islam. Mernissi ultimately wants the audience to relate to her issue by means of an emotional appeal, while also utilizing both ethical and logical appeal to support her thesis. Though, there may be stereotypical flaws within the authors reasoning behind the depiction of American women, I do find her thesis to be very well supported
In the Islamic faith, Muslim women are required to dress modestly by God. In the Qur’an, God speaks directly to all Muslim women and says “...guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment (The Qur’an 24:31)”. Muslim women have to wear a hijab, or a head covering, when they are in public places and when they are around men who are not close relatives. In fact, countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have a mandatory dress code enforced. Muslim women in these countries have to wear a hijab and an abaya, or a full-length, loose fitting garment on top of their clothes. Although God requires Muslim women to dress modestly and Saudi Arabia and Qatar have a dress code, it is entirely their choice on what they would like to wear.