Summary Of Marquis 'Argument'

921 Words2 Pages

In this paper, I will defend the view that abortion is not permissible. I will argue that Marquis’ argument, that abortion is impermissible, is sound. I will do this through multiple steps. First, I will present and explain Marquis’ views of why killing is wrong. Next, I will present and explain his argument that abortion is impermissible. Finally, I will criticize Marquis’ argument and provide a response to the criticism.
I will now present and explain Marquis’ views of why killing is wrong. Marquis believes that killing another human being is immoral. Marquis states that killing is primarily wrong not because of the effect on the victim’s friends or family, or the murderer, but its effect on the victim them self. When you kill, you are depriving …show more content…

Marquis’ argument mainly originates from his belief that killing is wrong. As I mentioned before Marquis believes that killing is primarily wrong because when an adult, child or fetus is killed you are depriving all the value of the future to that individual. (Notes) Killing a fetus deprives it of a future like ours so it is prima facie wrong. When something is “prima facie” wrong, it means that it has some morally bad feature, or some moral strike against it. (Dictionary) It can be argued however that not every action that is prima facie wrong, is wrong. For example, telling a lie is considered prima facie wrong, but it is considered morally permissible to lie in order to save a person’s life. When you kill a fetus, you are killing a lifetime of experiences. (Notes, p 104) Marquis’ view of why abortion is prima facie seriously morally wrong follows this …show more content…

He lists certain cases in which he would find abortion permissible. The first is if not having the abortion is just as bad as the death of the fetus. (p 105) Second, he states it might be permissible if it is so early in pregnancy that the fetus is not considered an individual. Third, he states it may not be impermissible to kill in certain situations where the victim doesn't seem to have a valuable future. Marquis also believes that anti-abortionists moral principles are too “broad in scope”. (Notes) By saying this, he means that when anti-abortionists say it’s always wrong to take a life, they’re being too broad. (p 101) For the anti-abortionist’s principle he gives the example of a living human cancer-cell culture. If the anti-abortionist’s principle is correct it is morally wrong to end the existence of a living human cancer-cell culture. (p 101) On the other hand, Marquis believes that pro-choicers’ moral principles are too “narrow in scope”. (Notes) When a pro-choicer says that it is wrong to kill only rational agents, they’re being too narrow. He gives the example of infants and severally mentally ill individuals. The pro-choicers principles are so narrow that it does not explain why it would be morally wrong to kill infants or the mentally ill. (p

Show More
Related

  • Don Marquis vs. Abortion

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    What is abortion? Abortion is killing a fetus inside a mother’s womb. According to Don Marquis, killing a fetus is morally impermissible. Marquis came up with an argument that views abortion as immoral and only in rare cases is it accepted. There are only a few rare cases that abortion is morally acceptable according to Marquis in his article, “Why Abortion is Immoral.” Marquis’s view on abortion is relatable because I am a woman and seeing as I am able to bare a child, I feel it is a women’s right to decide if abortion is permissible or not because it is her body and she has all the rights to her own body. Later described is FLO, one of Marquis’s arguments proving abortion is morally impermissible. I do not agree with the FLO argument. Marquis makes strong points, which can be agreeable, but in summary of Marquis’s arguments, he needs to have a more valid case of FLO.

    Read More

  • Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Don Marquis’s essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” he argues that abortion is immoral because he believes that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult human being. Marquis’ argument takes the following form:

    Read More

  • Thomson Abortion Hypothetical Analysis

    1482 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the case of abortion, Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible in most cases; she does this by using two hypothetical examples. The first example being a violinist and the second example being human seeds. In this paper, I will reiterate the hypothetical analysis by Thomson, state reasons for this argument being the most plausible, and I will discuss the strongest objection to the arguments given by Thomson.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Dan Marquis

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thirdly, Marquis concludes from the last two premises and says that if you kill a fetus then it is prima facie seriously morally wrong of you. By killing off a human being’s potential values, it is cruel, especially to children because they are defenseless. Then, Marquis asserts that if fetuses and adults are in the same moral categories then the fetus can only be aborted if there is a serious moral concern. In the beginning, Marquis proclaims that there are special cases like rape and the mom’s life being threatened that would override the “moral wrongness” of abortion.

    Read More

  • The Argument Of Judith Jarvis Thomson's View On Abortion

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are other factors in determining what rights a person has in a given circumstance. None of her arguments apply to pregnancy in which sex was voluntary and no effort was made to prevent pregnancy. She argues that abortion is permissible in three types of cases: (1) Rape (violinist experiment), (2) Threat to mothers’ life (death), (3) Cases where attempts were made to prevent the pregnancy (failure of contraception). At the end of her paper she says we must not fall below the standard of minimally decent Samaritans (MDS). However, she doesn’t really says what that standard

    Read More

  • Judith Jarvis Thomson's Argument On The Defense Of Abortion

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    She again uses a thought experiment where she presents a situation where if a mother were to carry her fetus to term that it would kill her. She states “we are told that performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but only letting her die,” which opens up an argument of the difference over killing a person and just letting them die when in this situation the mother could live if she was able to abort the pregnancy. She presents four scenarios to which this situation could end. The first is that killing an innocent is impermissible, so an abortion cannot take place. The second is killing an innocent is equivalent to murder, and murder is never okay so therefore an abortion can not take place. The third is, killing an innocent is worse then letting a person die therefore an abortion may not be performed. Finally, the fourth scenario is that if you have to choose between killing a person and letting them die you have to choose letting someone die and an abortion may not take place. She goes on to say that all of the scenarios are all false, but then only provides a reasoning for the second scenario saying that if the mother performed an abortion to save her own life that it could not

    Read More

  • Don Marquis Interpretation Of Abortion

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    Don Marquis is a philosopher arguing that any form of abortion is immoral. His original thesis states: In the overwhelming majority of cases, deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. He begins by stating why killing is wrong in three statements. He states, “killing is wrong because it brutalizes the killer, it is a loss to others, and it robs the victim of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future” (68). The first two statements do not address the fetus, but the last statement is very arguable, so Marquis emphasizes his argument on this premise. Depriving anybody of their future has many consequences. Some parts of a person’s future are valued now and some parts could be valued later. Therefore, it is wrong to kill any adult human because it is a loss of future (which has value). He addresses the questions of personhood by stating that fetuses have the potential to be humans. Therefore, killing a fetus is depriving the fetus of having a

    Read More

  • Abortion: Pro-Life and Pro-Choice

    1291 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abortion is an issue which separates the American public, especially when it involves the death of children and women. When an abortion occurs, the medical doctor removes the fetus from the pregnant woman. This particular act has separated the public. Many believe that abortion is not morally and ethically correct. On the other hand, some people believe that carrying and delivering the unborn child will hinder the safety of the mother, then an abortion is needed. Each view has its own merit in the debate. This debate has separated the public into two sections: pro-life and pro-choice. A pro-lifer opposes abortion, whereas, a pro-choicer believes that the decision to abort the child should be left to the mother because she is the one carrying the child. In this paper, there will be topics that will be discussed concerning pro-life and pro-choice. I hope at the end of this paper, the reader is able to gain more knowledge concerning each topic. Every woman has the right to control her own body.

    Read More

  • Patrick Lee And Robert P. George's The Wrong Of Abortion

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Patrick Lee and Robert P. George’s, “The Wrong of Abortion” is a contentious composition that argues the choice of abortion is objectively unethical. Throughout their composition, Lee and George use credibility and reason to appeal the immorality of abortions. The use of these two methods of persuasion are effective and compels the reader to consider the ethical significance. Lee and George construct their argument by disputing different theories that would justify abortions. They challenge the ontological and evaluation theories of the fetus, as well as the unintentional killing theory. This article was obtained through Google, in the form of a PDF file that is associated with Iowa State University.

    Read More

  • Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis

    1273 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marquis’s argument that it is immoral to kill, and abortion is wrong because it deprives one of a valuable future has a lot of problems in my eyes that does not make his view on anti-abortion solid. The lack of arguments that do not raise questions that seem to go unanswered make it hard to be persuaded to change a pro-abortionist mind or even be open to understanding where Marquis’s arguments lead. His “what if” argument leaves room for anyone opposing to “what if” in any direction which is not grounds for an effective argument and hurts Marquis’s because a lot of the questions go unanswered in his essay.

    Read More

  • Marquis´View on Abortion and Euthanasia

    762 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... abortion in several ways. First off, he is in favor of euthanasia, he believes that a terminally ill patient should not have to suffer or endure more pain if there is no pleasure in that person’s life and their future holds nothing but suffering. Marquis states that although the victim may believe that their life is valuable to them and the thought of death is frightening, their future does not hold anything of value and will only bring them further pain and suffering. Although he says that euthanasia is not immoral, his stance on abortion still fits with his stance on euthanasia. On the topic of euthanasia, if the patient is thinking rationally, he believes the victim should not have to suffer if their future holds no further value. Therefore, his theories and ideas still apply to each idea while simultaneously ensuring they do not conflict with one another.

    Read More

  • Essay On Why Abortion Is Wrong By Marquis

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    In my opinion, Marquis’ argument for why abortion is morally wrong has a couple of flaws, it’s biased towards the fetus and makes some unreasonable assumptions. Specifically, Marquis' account of why killing an adult human is wrong can potentially lead to some controversial conclusions. Marquis also doesn't consider any consequences on the lives of the potential parents of the fetus. Due to the nature of the topic of abortion, it really only applies to women who are thinking of getting an abortion, and as such, we cannot make the standard assumptions that we will have with normal fetuses. In this essay I will explain Marquis' argument, and try to show that his argument cannot conclude that abortion is morally wrong.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Don Marquis Views On Abortion

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    To conclude, Marquis’s argument that abortion is wrong is incorrect. Thomson gives many examples of why Marquis is wrong, including that the mother’s right to her body

    Read More

  • The Debate Of The Permissibility Of Abortion

    1114 Words  | 3 Pages

    The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”

    Read More

  • The Ethics Of Abortion, And Virtue Of Ethics

    1210 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abortion “is an issue that raises questions about life and death, about what a person is and when one becomes a person, about the meaning of life, about the rights of women, and about the duties of men”(Velasquez 485). Abortion is an unresolved ethical issue that has been in doubt for many years because one can argue that you are killing an innocent person/fetus but many argue that is not person because they don’t have a conscious or the characteristics that defines a “person”. John Stuart Mill in a way justifies abortion, Mill is known to be openly speak about women’s rights and about human rights. Although, it might be immortal to end someone’s life one might argued that the individual has the right to choose and have the option. But in

    Read More

More about Summary Of Marquis 'Argument'

Open Document