Summary Of Isaac's Storm

1014 Words3 Pages

Isaac’s Storm, by Erik Larson was a very fascinating book because it is difficult to say absolutely what the true subject of the book is. There are three key players in the book, first it is Isaac Cline a meteorologist for the U.S Weather Bureau, The U.S. Weather Bureau itself, and finally the storm of 1900. However, all three elements collaborate with one another in a significant way. The storm of 1900 is the main catalyst for one of the most devastating storms in the United States. However, the Weather Bureau and Isaac Cline both had an impact on the outcome of the catastrophic storm. The book generally focuses on the Galveston Hurricane of 1990, but more so the actions that Isaac Cline takes, or didn’t take rather. It was very tricky to …show more content…

The Devil in the White City one of his best sellers has attracted quite a bit of attention, so much so that one of Hollywood’s biggest star obtained the rights to display the story on the big screen. Before becoming a successful author and writing multiple best sellers, Erik Larson graduated summa cum laude from The University of Pennsylvania. After graduating from The University of Pennsylvania, Larson was hired as an editorial assistant. Larson decided to attend Columbia School of Journalism after seeing the movie, All the President’s Men. Larson’s first journalism job was with the Bucks County Courier Times, but after being passed over for a promotion Larson handed in his resignation and applied to multiple other places. He ended up becoming part of The Washington Post. Larson had a successful career with The Washington Post, but no longer desired to work within the journalism field. He turned down a position as chief editor and not long after was married. Larson would go on to write some novels that were never published and his first published novel, The Naked Consumer. His books combined has won several awards such as New York Times best seller, San Francisco Chronicle best book of the year, and the Edgar Award for best nonfiction crime writing. When taking a close look at his other books compared to Isaac’s Storm, they are all ultimately similar in that …show more content…

Overall, the book was effective in displaying the lack of experience that existed within the U.S Weather Bureau at the time. The book itself doesn’t quite exclaim that it was intended for historians, but more for the public. Larson very clearly expressed distrust in the government that existed in 1900. The strong underlying message nearly sounds as though Larson is saying, don’t trust the government. The book was very good, but one change I would make is to include photos and maps. The book included one map that did not give a good general idea of the events. The book continually talked of photos and maps, and it would have designated more as an extremely destructive

Open Document