Summary Of In Defense Of Superstitions

745 Words2 Pages

When people began to believe in superstitions do they really believe or do their unconscious behavior take control? In the reading “In Defense of Superstitions,” the author starts off by giving examples of what is considered superstition, with that being said, he states that everyone perhaps shares one superstition or another. He introduced the idea that certain superstitions can influence the future either for good or ill. He additionally explains that believing so much in superstition causes symptoms due to the increased levels of stress and fear. Even though superstition seems foolish they have roots in folk traditions and remind us of important historical events. As stated by the author he believes that superstition should not be absolutely debased because cultures would lose their cultural function and …show more content…

The majority of Americans are engaged in superstition activities and we either share one superstition or another with people because it has no basis in science. With that being said, superstitions will always be involved with our culture because we have either adapted them or we are raised with them. If people begin to believe in scientific analyze or research then we would see superstition as a fictional story. For example, we are told that the groom should not be allowed to see the bride before the ceremony assuming that they will have an unsuccessful marriage. If people start to assume that science is correct and everything is on our mind, then would people still believe in certain things? However, superstition should just be seen as something that makes people curious and become more extrovert. People want to have fun a feel the fear of certain superstitions. For instance, Friday the 13th is seen as a historical event but people nowadays take this superstition as something that is possible to happen on that same exact

Open Document