Summary Of Aristocratic Power And The Garden Park At Hesdin

1058 Words3 Pages

The two articles analyzed in the essay are Sharon Farm article entitled Aristocratic Power and the “Natural Landscape” The Garden Park at Hesdin and Abigail P. Dowling article entitled Landscape Luxuries: Mahaut d’Artois’s (1302-1329) Management and Use of Park at Hesdin. The two articles focus on the Park of Hesdin that was transformed through the order of Count Robert II of Artois in Northern France. Park Hesdin was transformed to become one of the famous, fantastic and unusual parks of Northern Europe until the end of 15th century. Count Robert II gave Park Hesdin a definitive shape that was endowed with features that were amazing and attractive. The Hesdin Park article by Abigail P. Dowling is more captivating than the article by Sharon …show more content…

The thesis of the authors was the main factors that help determine whether one article was more captivating than the other. Abigail P. Dowling thesis was to demonstrate the importance of the relationship that exists between aristocratic identity and land management. To support the thesis, Abigail mainly focuses on the selection of water, wood and plant harvesting as example to illustrate the important relationship that existed between aristocratic identity and land management (Dowling, 2012). The park contained variety of wood, plants and amazing water bodies that were attracted attention of various scholars. These were the main strong point of the Hesdon Park hence it was appropriate for Abigail to uses these elements to support her …show more content…

The thesis is also supported by relevant facts that are intended to give readers a thorough understanding of the importance of the theme. For example, after stating thesis statement Abigail went further and provides justification for the theme. She also indicated the evidence that she will use to support the theme. One evident that was clearly stated in support of theme was provision of the evidence from the two bailliages that were under the control of the countess in comparison with Hesdin relative productivity. The aim of comparing two other bailliages under the control of countess with Hesdin relative productivity was to give readers clear evidence that Park of Hesdin was more productive. Another significant element of Abigail article is that she limited the study between 1302 and1310 (Dowling, 2012). The main aim of this was for the study not to capture the period that was characterized with devastating environmental affects that was brought by great famine in 1314. This shows that the article was trying to be neutral since the Great Famine of 1314 significantly changed land management practices and this could have also affected the land management practices at Park of

Open Document