In the epistolary novellas “Address Unknown” by Katherine Kressman Taylor, and “Flowers of Algernon” by Daniel Keyes; the authors use first point of view to highlight the central theme. Additionally, the concept of naivety is the central theme of both stories. Initially, both main characters, Max and Charlie present themselves childlike, which makes them blind and ingenuous. The story, “Address Unknown”, by Katherine Kressman, describes the relationship between Max and Martin through first point of view to highlight his central theme. Originally, Max and Martin were in positive business terms towards each other, and while Martin moves back to Germany their companionship gradually drifts apart. Max, a Jew ceaselessly journalizes a friendly and gracious letter to Martin in Germany, while Martin openly betrays him. Martin joins and completely sides with Hitler and he allows Nazi’s to murder, Max’s sister, Griselle; “Poor little Griselle. I grieve with you, but as you see I was helpless to aid …show more content…
In Taylor’s story, Max and Martin were great business friends, and while Martin moves to Germany Max sent letters to keep in touch; “My Dear Martin: Back in Germany! How I envy you!”. Meanwhile, Martin betrays Max by allowing for his sister to die the Nazis. This proves Max’s naivety for thinking that Martin is his best friend. In the end, Max wakes up and smell’s the cup of coffee; consequently, he murders Martin by sending excessive letters to Germany. Additionally, in Keyes story, it states “It’s a funny thing I never knew that Joe and Frank and the others liked to have me around all the time to make fun of me”. Charlie thought he had top friends until he became smart and realized that his friends were mocking him behind his back. Furthermore, both stories are written in first point of view, which creates an intimacy between the reader and the protagonist, which also clearly demonstrates the central theme of
In the small, desolate town of Starkfield, Massachusetts, Ethan Frome lives a life of poverty. Not only does he live hopelessly, but “he was a prisoner for life” to the economy (Ammons 2). A young engineer from outside of town narrates the beginning of the story. He develops a curiosity towards Ethan Frome and the smash-up that he hears about in bits and pieces. Later, due to a terrible winter storm that caused the snow itself to seem like “a part of the thickening darkness, to be the winter night itself descending on us layer by layer” (Wharton 20), the narrator is forced to stay the night at Frome’s. As he enters the unfamiliar house, the story flashes back twenty-four years to Ethan Frome’s young life. Living out his life with Zenobia Frome, his hypochondriac of a wife whom he does not love, Ethan has nowhere to turn for a glance at happiness. But when Zenobia’s, or Zeena’s, young cousin, Mattie Silver, comes to care for her, Ethan falls in love with the young aid. Mattie is Ethan’s sole light in life and “she is in contrast to everything in Starkfield; her feelings bubble near the surface” (Bernard 2). All through the novella, the two young lovers hide their feelings towards each other. When they finally let out their true emotions to each other in the end, the consequence is an unforeseen one. Throughout Ethan Frome, Edith Wharton portrays a twisted fairy tale similar to the story of Snow White with the traditional characters, but without a happy ending to show that in a bleak and stark reality, the beautiful and enchanting maiden could become the witch.
Literary critic, Walter Wells, states this in his analysis of the two pieces, writing that “both protagonists have come to realize that romantic gestures -- in fact, that the whole chivalric world view -- are, in modern times, counterproductive” (Wells 3). Both protagonists, being either a child or just a year into his adulthood, lacks a true understanding of the world around them. Motivated by their incomplete knowledge of the world and the people around them, they act out in a grand gesture, hoping to attract the attention and admiration of Mangan’s sister for the narrator in Araby and Queenie for Sammy in A&P. However, due to the same, flawed ideology of the workings of the world that motivates them to carry out their plan, it ultimately leads to their downfall. In conclusion, both pieces of literature show that life is a process of maturation by learning from one’s failures. Both the Narrator from Araby and Sammy from A&P fail in their original goal of gaining the affection of the girls through their grand gestures. Furthermore, both characters, in acting out their plan, realize their lack of understanding of the world and thus loose their innocence. Finally, through their growth, they are able to, by
Ethan Frome is the story of a family caught in a deep-rooted domestic struggle. Ethan Frome is married to his first love Zeena, who becomes chronically ill over their long marriage. Due to his wife’s condition, they took the services of Zeena’s cousin, Mattie Silver. Mattie seems to be everything that Zeena is not, youthful, energetic, and healthy. Over time Ethan believes that he loves Mattie and wants to leave his wife for her. He struggles with his obligations toward Zeena and his growing love for Mattie. After Zeena discovers their feelings toward each other, she tries to send Mattie away. In an effort to stay together, Ethan and Mattie try to kill themselves by crashing into the elm that they talked about so many times. Instead, Mattie becomes severely injured and paralyzed. The woman that was everything that Zeena was not became the exactly the same as her. In Ethan Frome, the author communicates meanings in this story through various symbols. One of the most significant symbols used in this story is the very setting itself.
Frederick is written in a third person’s point of view. The narrator is not Frederick or one of the other field mice in the story, but rather an outside person, or perhaps a mouse, who tells the story. By telling the sto...
All thanks to his friend Walter kugler. Walter is Max 's best friend. Walter and Max started battling each other growing up, yet soon got to be companions. In the early phases of the Holocaust, Walter helps Max avoid the Nazis and organizes Max to stay at Hans Hubermann 's place. Even though Max is going through tough times he is able to keep a strong relationship with walter. Despite the fact that Max is experiencing extreme times he can keep a solid relationship with walter. Secondly is the relationship Max has with Liesel. In spite of the fact that Liesel is apprehensive meeting Max to begin, they soon turn out to be great companions. They share bad dreams as their first talk together. Max has left his family and Liesel has lost her sibling. Sharing their mishaps the two get to be associated through sharing their souls and the printed word. Liesel instructs Max that he can express his sketchy identity through words. "i have hated the words and i have loved them, and i hope i have made them right” (528). Max and Liesel have grown to love and learn from one another. Lastly, is the relationship Max has with Hans before leaving them. Max left since Hans has shown love for a Jew in a parade, and Max realized that Hans ' home would be hunted by the NSDAP down evidence of
The main character Liesel, known as “the book thief” is who Death is looking over. Liesel, her mother, and brother are on a train to Munich. On the train ride her brother dies. She and her mother get off the train to bury him. The first book Liesel steals is from the gravediggers. They continue the journey to a town called Molching, where Liesel will be raised by foster parents, Hans and Rosa Hubermann. Liesel adjusts to her new home life. Hans teaches Liesel how to read. The war is escalating in Germany. The town holds a book-burning to celebrate Hitler’s birthday. That’s when Liesel steals another book from the flames. Liesel’s job is to deliver laundry to the Hermann family. The Hermanns’ have a library full of books. Liesel is allowed to read them in the study. Meanwhile, a German-Jew named Max needs help, so he seeks out the Hubermanns. Max hides in the basement, so he is safe from the Nazis. Liesel begins stealing books from the Hermanns. The Nazis parade the Jews through the town of Molching on their way to the concentration camp for everyone to see. Liesel is given a blank notebook to write her own story. One night the neighborhood is bombed. Hans, Rosa, and the rest of the neighborhood is killed. Rescue workers find Liesel under the rubble. She leaves behind her finished book, called The Book Thief. Death, who has been watching, rescues the book. Liesel ends up living with the mayor
The heroine is a sweet, shy companion of Mrs. Van Hopper. The two go to breakfast, dinner,and parties together. She is not used to talking to an older man such as Mr. De Winter. She is very shy around Mr. De Winter and very respectful when it comes to talking about Rebecca which he does not talk much about.
Initially, Rios illustrates a young boy perplexed by a new-found maturity. As the maturation from childhood to adolescence begins, he is facing unfamiliar feelings about the opposite sex. An example of this is apparent as Rios explains that the boy cannot talk to girls anymore; at least “not the same way we used to” (Rios 453). Since his emotions have new depth and maturity, the young boy realizes the nature of his friendships has changed. Innocence is further lost as the girls who are former friends, “weren’t the same girls we used to know” (453). The boy has matured from his casual, youthful interactions, and is now seeing the girls in a new light. Another example of his maturity manifests sexually as he reflects about the girls, “and all the things we wanted to do with them” (454). Although he is unsure how to act upon his thoughts, the innocence is none the less tainted by his desires for mature relations with the young girls. The maturity and sexual maturity bring forth a storm of emotions that prove to be both exhilarating and confusing for the young boy.
Charlie struggles with apparent mental illness throughout his letters, but he never explicitly addresses this problem. His friends make him realize that he is different and it is okay to be different from everyone else. This change in perspective gives Charlie new opportunities to experience life from a side he was unfamiliar with. Without these new friends, Charlie would have never dared to try on the things he has. His friends have helped him develop from an antisocial wallflower to an adventurous young man who is both brave and loyal. Transitioning shapes how the individual enters into the workforce, live independently and gain some control over their future
...seful miscommunication between men and women. Lastly, when looking through the imagined perspective of the thoughtless male tricksters, the reader is shown the heartlessness of men. After this reader’s final consideration, the main theme in each of the presented poems is that both authors saw women as victims of a male dominated society.
The narrator maintains a cool distance from the subjects of the story and readers are invited only to peer into the lives of the characters as opposed to joining them on their quests for love and success. Haywood explores the (sometimes fatal) ramifications of relentlessly pursuing self-interest without stopping to think about how it will affect oneself and others in the long run, especially concerning ambitious women. Alovisa is the first woman introduced to the audience, and one of the first things readers learn about her is that she is prideful. Haywood writes, “Aloisa, if her passion was not greater than the rest, her pride, and the good opinion she had of her self, made her the less able to support it; she sighed, she burned, she raged, when she perceived the charming D’elmont behaved himself toward her with no mark of distinguishing affection” (38). Neglecting the social ideals of her time, Alovisa takes it upon herself to aggressively pursue D’elmont as a suitor.
In order to connect the setting of this story to the plot we must take a closer look at each place that this story takes residence. We start with the “hills across the valley of the Ebro.” We note that “there is no shade and no trees” This is the first thing that we could relate to the plot, our main characters discuss some important topics in the plot of the story. The first part of successful communication is that there must be willingness on both sides of the relationship for the two people to be “out in the open” about their thoughts and concerns.
In the Elizabeth Tallent’s story “No One’s a Mystery,” it talks about how a naive eighteen year old girl falls in love with a cynical man named Jack who is only interested in sexual play with the girl. Jack has a wife but he belittles her with comments towards the narrator. Jack is having an affair with the narrator and he does not show any care in his actions. Jack sees the narrator as a child in his eyes and he easily manipulates her for his own satisfaction. The narrator is oblivious to Jack’s intentions due to her fixation of her imagined future with him.
Two of the main characters, Jack and Algernon, strive to be "Ernest" and "Earnest" in the play, yet they both deceive others to escape lives which they grow tired of. They both hope to marry the girls that they love, yet they are starting the relationship based on false pretence and lies. It is ironic that they both call themselves "Ernest," a name that suggests honesty and sincerity, yet they both create stories to escape something or the other. Jack creates a brother called "Ernest" in the city that he uses as a scape goat' to leave his prim and proper, respectable country life, whereas Algernon creates a friend by the name of "Bunbury" to escape his aunt's high class society parties. He shows his lack of interest in such social events when he tells Jack.
The boy is haplessly subject to the city’s dark, despondent conformity, and his tragic thirst for the unusual in the face of a monotonous, disagreeable reality, forms the heart of the story. The narrator’s ultimate disappointment occurs as a result of his awakening to the world around him and his eventual recognition and awareness of his own existence within that miserable setting. The gaudy superficiality of the bazaar, which in the boy’s mind had been an “oriental enchantment,” shreds away his protective blindness and leaves him alone with the realization that life and love contrast sharply from his dream (Joyce). Just as the bazaar is dark and empty, flourishing through the same profit motivation of the market place, love is represented as an empty, fleeting illusion. Similarly, the nameless narrator can no longer view his world passively, incapable of continually ignoring the hypocrisy and pretension of his neighborhood. No longer can the boy overlook the surrounding prejudice, dramatized by his aunt’s hopes that Araby, the bazaar he visited, is not “some Freemason affair,” and by the satirical and ironic gossiping of Mrs. Mercer while collecting stamps for “some pious purpose” (Joyce). The house, in the same fashion as the aunt, the uncle, and the entire neighborhood, reflects people