Suicide Argumentative Analysis

2305 Words5 Pages

Suicide is the third leading cause of teenage death in the United States. If this is the case why wouldn’t there be more prevention programs out there for these teenagers? Suicide prevention in schools is up for debate on whether or not it would have a positive effect on teenagers, or a negative impact on their state of mind. According to the study “A Review and Application of Suicide Prevention Programs in High School Settings,” by Gregory Cooper, Cooper declares that in the long run prevention programs in schools would be beneficial to suicidal students. However, Dena Wanner the author of the study “The Impact of a Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Program on Knowledge, Attitudes, Awareness, and Response to Suicidal Youths,” believes that …show more content…

Many argumentative studies argue the same “broad topic” but are not specifically arguing the narrowed topic. So when I came across these two studies, I knew that it was as close as I was going to get to having two arguments for suicide prevention in schools. The general criteria I established in order to evaluate these two arguments was to see if the studies were published to credible publishers, if they had done their own background research and that the arguments were not all based off of opinion, and if they were time relevant. My specific criteria for evaluating the two studies were that they both had to have sufficient history on suicide itself or suicide prevention, discussion of how schools have handled suicide prevention programs in the past or present, and to have argued the topic with an open mind, or to look at the topic from different points of views. Cooper’s and Wanner’s studies have met my established criteria is most ways, except for time relevance. Both of these studies were done more than 5 years ago, which can mean that the information may be outdated. Although, reading through the studies I found out that suicide has always been a relevant topic and that not much has changed since five years ago besides the suicide …show more content…

Both Cooper and Wanner are a part of the scientific medical field. Cooper is has a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and works for the Christiana Care Health System, and has done multiple collaborative studies. Wanner on the other hand, is a psychologist with a master’s degree from Pacific University, School of Professional Psychology. Considering that these two authors are “professionals” in the medical field, it makes me believe that they are credible and are competent enough to realistically write about

Open Document