Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women in shakespearean tragedy
Gender Issues In Literature
Women empowerment in Shakespeare novels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the instance of 17th century women, the words demure and subordinate may come to mind. During this time, the men held political and economic power while the women were expected to be subservient and stay in the background. To speak against a man could prove to be a great challenge in a time where men control your whole life. However, in Molière’s Tartuffe, he shows that women were capable of reason just like men, if not better at times. One of the women that showed considerable amounts of strength throughout the story was the wife, Elmire. Elmire was not only strong, but intelligent and fair as well. Elmire’s strength becomes evident within moments of starting the play. As Madame Pernelle, her mother-in-law, storms out of the house, Elmire …show more content…
After Tartuffe made his intentions known to Elmire, she was going to let it remain hidden as long as Tartuffe agreed to decline the marriage with Mariane. Unfortunately, Damis happened to witness the encounter, and told his father; of course Orgon did not believe him as he was completely enamored with the man. This led to Damis being kicked out of the house and the marriage between Tartuffe and Mariane intact. Eventually enough became enough and Elmire boldly addressed her husband, “And now, I wonder, have you lost your mind? Your love for this one man has made you blind. Can you stand there and say you don’t believe a word we’ve said? That we’re here to deceive?” (4.3 42-45) In this quote, Elmire has become fed up with Orgon’s stupidity and attempts to bring light to his errors; pointing out to him that he is too infatuated with Tartuffe to see the evil man he really is. She then continues by showing Orgon that it has gone too far if he cannot even believe his own wife or family when they have repeatedly tried to show him the truth. Having the ability to stand up to her husband like this and point out his flaws would require a strong mindset. Weaker women would have remained quiet and submitted to her husband without hesitation. Elmire was strong enough to stand up for what she knew was right; even if that required her to insult her husband a little bit she went through with it to the …show more content…
She does not wish harm to come to anyone even if they deserve it, like Tartuffe. After Damis comes out of hiding and states that he is going to go tell Orgon of Tartuffe’s treachery, Elmire, being the voice of rationality, tries to talk him out of it. She explains, “Damis, there is a lesson to be learned, and there is my forgiveness to be earned. I promised him. Don’t make me take it back. It’s not my nature to see as an attack such foolishness as this, or see the need to tell my husband of the trivial deed.” (3.4 10-15) In this quote, Elmire is trying to persuade Damis to calm down and think for a moment; if she felt attacked, then she would have gone to her husband. Something that stands out is, “there is a lesson to be learned, and my forgiveness to be earned.” (3.4 10-11) She is willing to let it slide this time for the purpose of Tartuffe perhaps learning from his mistakes, and working to earn Elmire’s forgiveness. This shows her nature as fair and slow to judgement. She does not necessarily want to ruin Tartuffe; she just wants to help her family. Even if she has to deal with some terrible hypocrite practically slobbering on her, she will deal with it in order to help her family to the best of her
Harte showed Duchess’s emotional side of her. Her “...pent-up feelings found vent in a few hysterical tears...” (Harte, 2) shows the Duchess as emotional, a drama queen, spontaneous and impulsive. This was before she changed, though. “The Duchess, previously a selfish and solitary character, does all she can to comfort and console the fearful Piney.” (Moss and Wilson, 4) Duchess's character reveals that people can switch their habits no matter what the circumstances
Weakness in Tartuffe The play "Tartuffe", by Moliere, is a work that was created to show people a flaw in their human nature. There are two characters who portray the main flaws presented in the play. Both Madame Pernelle and Orgon are blinded to the farces of Tartuffe and must be coaxed into believing the truth. The fact that Orgon and Madame Pernelle are too weak to see the truth is an important theme of the play.
If anything, Madame Pernelle and Orgon are incredibly gullible. One author suggests that this gullibility is a shared family trait, stating that “his mother shares his capacity for self-delusion even after Tartuffe has been found out (we cannot always judge by what we see)” (Weals). Orgon foolishly believes that Tartuffe is a man of God, and, because of this, he should put everything he has into Tartuffe's hands. He proves how much he believes this after Damis tells him that Tartuffe was flirting with Elmire. From this accusation Orgon replies to Damis: "I disinherit you; an empty purse / Is all you'll get from me - except my curse!" (III, vii , 68). Madame Pernelle shows the family trait that she shares with her son when she states: "He's a fine man, and should be listened to."(I, i ,44), while speaking of Tartuffe. Although they share this trait throughout the play, Orgon's eyes are finally opened at the end of the play while his mother is still held by the farce of Tartuffe.
... I think that women are the best at uprising children; especially a women elevated me. I think that women are very vital and are identical to men in many characteristics. Would women be clever to decide what they lack in vivacity? Yes definitely, because of equivalence. Would every women feel the need to practice to exist in an influential profession or place in society? To me I think if they need to, that is their worthy. The circumstance is that several women enjoy to yield on the usual masculinity responsibility. Is that an immoral entity? I don’t believe so, since overdue all perfect thoughts, there are influencers that target in manipulating their situation sanctioning them to triumph significance. So alongside that, women in both esteems, unceremoniously what responsibility they show in humanity, functions a vivacious segment in civilization and always will.
The renaissance began a momentous time in the history of Western Europe. Many new forms and styles of arts, literature, and customs emerged during this period. Economic, social, and cultural changes affected the lives of everyone. Particularly the role of women in society was affected. There were four categories of women: wives, mothers, widows and daughters. Within each of these categories, certain duties were expected. Jacob Burckhardt once wrote, 'to understand the higher forms of social intercourse in this period, we must keep before our minds the fact that women stood on a footing of perfect equality with men.'. It is a widely known fact that this in no way was true. Inequalities between men and women have always affected society. Men were constantly gaining up on women and spoke of them with contempt. They believed that woman was more sinful than man. This belief goes back to original sin when Eve had been seduced by the devil. Eve's actions made men assume that women deserved to suffer.
After the Middle Ages, Europe experienced a Renaissance, or an era of rebirth. This era provided Europe with new discoveries and advancements in the areas of geography, politics, social, economic and culture. It lasted between 1300-1500 and is considered the transition from medieval times to the early modern world. Some notable people from this area are Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vici, Raphael and Donatello. However, the group most often overlooked during this period were women. In Joan Kelly-Gadol's essay "Did Women Have a Renaissance," she stated that although that it was a time for new developments and rebirth, it mostly benefited men. Although not talked about in full depth in history textbooks, women were a viable
Which is caused by the narrator having a male perspective. The narrator does not give the women and credit or redeeming qualities. All the women follow a general stereotype. If they tried to break away from the stereotype, they would me more important and influential characters. Paquette, a chambermaid in the Baron’s castle, is described as “a pretty and obedient brunette” (5). She is identified obedient not because of her job as a chambermaid, but because she is willing to exploit her soul and body to the men around the castle. In regards to the old woman, she doesn’t even have an actual name, which does not matter since is ugly and useless. The old woman has the mindset that she is; an object; a mistake; a disgrace. That her time has passed as a beautiful useful woman. All the rape and abuse has physically affected her and she is out of luck. In fact, she is lucky if men talk to her, or even look at her without
Though women were subordinates by both the eye of the church and the government, women found ways to express authority both intentionally and unintentionally. Women began to act independently in patriarchal society. In 17th century Euro-America Puritan society believed that men played a patriarchal role upon women, and that this role was instituted by God and nature. The seniority of men over women lay within both the household and the public sphere. The household, immediate family living in the same dwelling was subject to the male as head figure of the house. The public sphere also known as the social life within the Puritan community consisted of two echelons. These echelons consisted of formal and informal public. The formal public consisted of woman and indentured servants. Women were to stay within the informal public and stay in the shadows of the men.
"Ah. And Tartuffe?"(21). When she tells him of Tartuffe's unconcern and zealous consumption in spite of Elmire's condition, he says, "Poor fellow!" Poor Orgon is so caught up in his own
"Women were denied knowledge of their history, and thus each woman had to argue as though no woman before her had ever thought or written. Women had to use their energy to reinvent the wheel, over and over again, generation after generation. ... thinking women of each generation had to waste their time, energy and talent on constructing their argument anew. Generation after generation, in the face of recurrent discontinuities, women thought their way around and out from under patriarchal thought." (Lerner qtd in Merrim Modern Women xxiii)
The characters Madame Pernelle, and Mariane, follow the roles as stereotypical women in that time, whereas Dorine and Elmire push the boundaries and start to show an edgier depiction of women. Madame Pernelle is depicted as an obnoxious old woman, she is very stubborn and stuck in her ways. She believes what she says is always right which kind of gives her a hint of ignorance. For example, this stubbornness and ignorance is brought to light when Orgon tells her of what he has learned about Tartuffe and ultimately tries to convince her that he is a fake she replies with “No, no, a man of such surpassing piety could not do such a thing. You cannot shake me. I don’t believe it and you shall not make me.” (5.3.24). Mariane is an overly obedient and hide in the shadows type of girl, she obeys to her father Orgon’s every command. That is until he asks her to end her engagement with her fiancé Valere who she is madly in love with, which even then does not cause her to develop a voice of her own it is Dorine who speaks up for her. Dorine comes off as a very opinionated, sassy, and outspoken woman. Due to her position as a maid, and overall upbringing she has no problem speaking up when she feels something is wrong, no matter whether it is to a man or a woman, which was very rare in the 17th century to hear of a woman speaking out against a man. For example, when Organ is
In the late 16th century England experienced poverty, starvation, increase in population, inequality amongst women and men, and lack of opportunity in the work force. During this time England was torn between two religions, Catholicism and Protestantism. England’s economy was primarily agricultural, workers were tied to their land. Due to the social inequality of the 16th century, women were limited to their rights and men were superior. Women worked in the clothing industry and men worked primarily on the farm. Due to the economic hardships in England, men and women migrated to London for a better life. The nation was under the rule of Queen Elizabeth, who surpassed the restrictions placed on women. This paper explores the shortcomings and hardships experienced in Elizabethan England.
Throughout time and across many cultures, women have had the lowest status in society. In a patriarchal world, women have consistently been viewed as weaker and inferior to men. As a result, it is no surprise that men have found themselves in places of power and admiration. However, this does not mean that society completely neglects the impact of women; in Greek lore, women take on passive yet important roles, weaving the destinies and doom of many men and earning themselves a reputation as banes of manipulation and deception. Negative as that portrayal may seem, other societies have defined the roles of their women differently. Anglo-Saxons also flaunted the heroics of their men, as exemplified
Prior to the Urbanization and Industrialization in most societies which welcomed the decline of slavery and the emancipation of women, being female is indirectly classified as weakness.
Women have always been essential to society. Fifty to seventy years ago, a woman was no more than a house wife, caregiver, and at their husbands beck and call. Women had no personal opinion, no voice, and no freedom. They were suppressed by the sociable beliefs of man. A woman’s respectable place was always behind the masculine frame of a man. In the past a woman’s inferiority was not voluntary but instilled by elder women, and/or force. Many, would like to know why? Why was a woman such a threat to a man? Was it just about man’s ability to control, and overpower a woman, or was there a serious threat? Well, everyone has there own opinion about the cause of the past oppression of woman, it is currently still a popular argument today.