Are they star crossed lovers or are they star crossed fakers? In The Hunger Games By Suzane Collins katniss does not like what the capital is doing to the districts and in the American Revolution the colonist did not like the way the king was treating the colonies both led to rebellion. The Hunger Games and the Revolutionary war were both based off a rebellion they both wanted individuality but because of the government they had to fight for it both ended very differently. In The Hunger Games Katniss is rebelling against the capital and does not like the fact that there are the games where kids have to slaughter each other till there is only one left. They have the hunger games Because before they had a war where all the districts rebelled …show more content…
When they got back to the capitol haymitch met them and said they only way to stay alive and not get there tongues cut out was to fake the star crossed lovers thing for the rest of there lives. They knew this was going to happen so while they were on the train they decided to get married to give the capital what they wanted to hear and see. They had to go around each district and make speeches about the dead tributes from there district and they were acting as a couple and this made the districts mad but rave at the same time. In the revolution the colonist were tired of being treated poorly and they wanted independence so they went to war with britain they went back and forth with winning but finally the colonist decided to take action and build up there army and finally they won there independence and they become the 13 states of individuals. They had issues but finally worked them out and made the declaration of independence and the constitution and we become the United …show more content…
The Hunger Games and the Revolutionary war were both based off a rebellion they both wanted individuality but because of the government they had to fight for it both ended very differently. The revolution was very different from The Hunger game but very similar at the same time. I brought up how they mistreated the districts and the colonies they both didn't like how they were being treated so they decided to do something about tit the king of england was treating the colonist poorly and the capital was treating the districts poorly and this turned into a rebellin. Katniss didn't like what they where doing so she found a way to make the captial mad and the colonist didn't like what the king was doing so they did the same thing but the colonist went to war and won there independence. They both eneded up being free but in very different
The article also compared the government of the Hunger Games to the government in reality. Kids are already showing signs of sci-fi behavior. The movie and the book can influence the generation greatly. The Hunger Games can motivate kids to become rebels of this generation. Rees Brennan, Sarah.
Another blaring difference between the two societies in Fahrenheit 451 and the Hunger Games is that of their government. The form of government in Fahrenheit 451 consists of a democracy whereas the Hunger Games government is corrupt and resembles nothing of a democracy. Even though we may see the world of Fahrenheit 451 as strange and bad there is still a democracy, which we consider to be fair. A similarity between the two governments systems would be how they both suppress things much like it is today, that each government believes could hurt the stability of society. The Hunger Games government suppresses interaction between districts to instill conformity because they know if there was interaction it could cause unhappiness and take away from the level of cooperation between the people and the government.
Throughout these two romantic and tragic stories, there are many examples of similarities and differences with catastrophe, characters, and themes. In conclusion of The Hunger Games, twenty-two loves are lost because the people involved in the games are trying to save their own lives. There are also similarities between the characters in both stories. In the beginning, there was a similarity of a love triangle going on in both stories. It involves Juliet, Romeo, and Paris.
Suzanne Collins has, through her writings, used great imagery to expose the meaningful side of ‘The Hunger Games’, the side that is not all about what takes place in the arena. The Capitol’s rule over the districts, the reality-show part of the Hunger Games and the Mockingjay pin are all fragments of deeper meanings that create the basis of all that the story is. Suzanne Collins has depicted the country of Panem as a place overruled by a large city, known as the Capitol. The Hunger Games is apparently a means to keep peace and a fair punishment for the rebellion of the districts, where district 13 was obliterated in the mess. However, Collins has spun this interpretation around and unveiled a different perspective – that The Hunger Games is
In “The Lottery,” Mrs. Hutchinson says, “`It isn’t fair,’ she said. A stone hit her on the side of the head” (Jackson 7). Mrs. Hutchinson does not even try to get away, she only stands there and lets the townspeople kill her. She does not try to stand up to her society at all and she shows how she does not even try to change her fate. She only stands still and does not try to get away. Though these stories both have a female protagonist, The Hunger Games has a protagonist who stands up to her society in time to save herself. In The Hunger Games, the main character, Katniss, is one of the two participants still alive at the end of The Hunger Games. She and her fellow district mate, Peeta Mellark, are both still alive. The government says only one of them may win. Katniss convinces Peeta to eat deadly berries. They are just about to eat the berries when they are both declared the winners. Katnisss is reacting to the rule change. She is showing how she is not going to stand by and let the government control her. Katniss shows people should stand up for what they believe in and to not give into their society and to not be controlled. Both of the stories have a female protagonist differing how and when they stand up for themselves.
The Hunger Games was a good movie when it came out. This movie refers to a dystopia world in which there are 12 districts and a capitol who rules with an iron fist, in which the districts must provide a tribute to fight in an annual Hunger Game as a punishment for a past rebellion. Katniss Everdeen is a hunter from the 12th district, which Gale, her friend gives her tips on hunting. One day her sister, Primrose Everdeen, is chosen for the Hunger Games, and in order to save her, she volunteers instead to serve in the Games along with Peeta Mellark. During a TV interview, Peeta confesses her love for Katniss Everdeen, which causes the enragement of the latter; however, she later forgives him as he explains to her that it was only to gain sponsors. During the Hunger Games, she did not receive a lot of supplies except some medicine to cure a wound, but Districts 1 and 2 almost won the Game due to their training, and amount of supplies which Katniss destroys but cannot recover any of them. The Hunger Games was one of the best movies I ever watched because it has a little bit of everything and it captures the real-life survival game that we live on a daily basis.
Katniss, from The Hunger Games, comes to realize that the government is twisting the true meaning of the Hunger Games The government is twisting the meaning of the Hunger Games by taking what the true meaning ment when they first starting to do these so called Games. She also realizes that the government dehumanizes the population of each District.
In the novel The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins a new country is created. Panem is born in place of North America, were the Hunger Games began. In the Hunger Games, there are 24 tributes. Tributes are people who live in the districts. The tributes in the Hunger Games are all the same. They kill one another and become the Capitols puppets. The tributes become violent, emotionless puppets. Then there is Katniss. Katniss is an excellent hunter and becomes lethal during the games. However, she has not lost her compassion. Katniss does not think of herself as a good person. When in reality she is a good person with a large heart, who puts others before herself.
Furthermore, the omnipotent powers of the two films are also proven to be similar. The authorities displayed in both movies completely control all things regarding their people. They make unethical and inhumane plans that endanger the citizens of their land. The Capitol of the film “The Hunger Games” uses its people to fight to death for entertainment and the Divergent government uses mind control to get their army to do whatever they are told. These government authorities, in both films, treat their people as puppets who are forced under their
Since she is the female victor from district 12, she is in the 74th Hunger Games. She sees how painful and scary it is and so she tries to stop the capital which is who is controlling everything. She doesn’t want that to happen to anyone else. She rebels against President Snow in plan of eventually killing him to take over the capital and change the world. Teens can relate to this because a lot of the time we feel controlled. It might be by a parent, teacher, grandparent or someone else but all of us are controlled by someone. A lot of teenagers end up rebelling because they feel as if they have no choices. They go against the rules of who they are rebelling against. That persons rules and values are not necessarily right. Who decides what is right? It seems as if we have entered into a state time where there is no right and wrong. Katniss breaks free of that control and does her own thing. Another way teens can relate to the hunger games is through the love triangle. Some of us might have a similar situation of where we might like two people. In the movie it says, “What I need is not Gales fire, kindled with rage and hatred. I have plenty of fire myself. What I need is the dandelion in the spring. The bright yellow that means rebirth instead of destruction. The promise that life can go on, no matter how bad our losses. That it can be good again. And only Peeta can
Both of them take place in dystopian settings, where The Hunger Games has Panem, but Battle Royale has the police state, the Republic of Greater East Asia. Not only that, but both have teens forced into death games (and more similarities that would spoil both books if I said them.) But, because of their similarities they also have more contrast. In Battle Royale all the teens know each other, so that means that daily things like gossip or bullying can be deadly. Also, the characters of The Hunger Games have to fight for their weapons by grabbing bags, but the characters in Battle Royale are assigned bags, which means that you could get a knife, or you could end up getting a useless item like a frying pan. The Hunger Games also has the whole death show on air, but in Battle Royale only the winner gets
...Andersen) . Both stories rely on tradition in order for society to function. Katniss and Tesse realize that if they do not participate that harm will fall upon their families. To keep order and balance tradition, no matter how cruel and harsh must be followed. Sacrifice is beneficial to both of these stories because without sacrifice the characters would put their families in a bad situation unless they stepped up to the plate. Both The Hunger Games and The Lottery demonstrate that “The odds aren't always forever in there favor” (Collins).
In a not-too-distant, some 74 years, into the future the United States of America has collapsed, weakened by drought, fire, famine, and war, to be replaced by Panem, a country divided into the Capitol and 13 districts. Each year, two young representatives from each district are selected by lottery to participate in The Hunger Games; these children are referred to as tributes (Collins, 2008). The Games are meant to be viewed as entertainment, but every citizen knows their purpose, as brutal intimidation of the subjugated districts. The televised games are broadcasted throughout Panem as the 24 participants are forced to eradicate their competitors, literally, with all citizens required to watch. The main character throughout the series is a 16-year-old girl from District 12 named Katniss Everdeen.
Unmistakably, neither of these stories depends on genuine occasions. Albeit numerous commentators have seen an analogy between World War Two and Harry Potter, it is out of line to peruse these writings simply as moral stories. Not at all like youngsters ' stories, for example, Michael Morpurgo 's War Horse, the characters in both Harry Potter and The Hunger Games are battling for an alternative world than our own particular and in this way both stories contain components of the fantastical Harry Potter as a bit of optional world writing and The Hunger Games as a post-prophetically calamitous envisioning without bounds North America. Nonetheless, saying this doesn 't imply that that their messages about war ought to be disregarded just in light of the fact that they are anecdotal. Although diverse levels and sorts of savagery are delineated in these books, both writings are additionally progressively keen on the political part of war, as much as its impact on youngsters and social orders. Besides, both arrangement close with the triumph of the saints and the reclamation of their universes to what
The main character, Katniss, volunteers as tribute for her district to save her sister from having to be tribute. Upon arriving in the Capitol for the games, she sees just how vast the gap between the Capitol and districts are. To fight against this class struggle, she begins to revolt. At first this comes in the form of small things, like shooting an arrow at a pig feast of Capitol higher-ups and refusing to kill her friend in the games, resulting in the first ever co-victors of the Hunger Games. Katniss’ actions soon lead to full blown rebellion in the districts, starting a revolutionary war between them and the Capitol. At one point Katniss remarks: “My ongoing struggle against the Capitol, which has so often felt like a solitary journey, has not been undertaken alone. I have had thousands upon thousands of people from the districts at my side.” (Catching Fire 90). In true Marxist fashion the working class needed to use a violent revolution to confront the class struggle against the ruling