Stanley Fish On Identity Politics Analysis

999 Words2 Pages

“I don't care what views he holds, even what bad things he may have done, what lack of ability he may display, he's my brother, he's my kinsman, he's my landsman,he comes from my neighborhood, he's a Southerner, this is my country right or wrong.” Voters such as this represent the very idea behind identity politics. When one votes against or for someone based upon religion, skin color, gender, sexual preferences, and/or any subject matter at that, and it drives their voting decision towards a yes or no result for a particular candidate, they are practicing identity politics. Writer Stanley Fish dives into identity politics in his New York Times article “When ‘Identity Politics’ Is Rational .” He brings forth the good and bad, and the right …show more content…

He organizes his ideas and opinions precisely with supportive reasoning and statements from other writers. How he voices his findings are relatable and uplifting. Reviewing this article has broaden my understanding of identity politics. The tone he uses throughout the article exemplifies great expression and all and all human emotions towards the subject at hand. The way he stands up for those who may choose to vote for those whom they most identify with, shows that he still understands himself that to some extent identity politics is rational and just. For example when he argues Stanley Crouch’s objection that “groups and populations are not monolithic but display a diversity of attitudes and positions.” He voices that although that statement may be true it is not to say the least that those same members of those particular groups are populations can't come together for the greater good for a shared concern or …show more content…

As mentioned previously when he distinguishes the two forms of identity politics as tribal and interest; he breaks them down in two ways that are not only understandable but also realistic and logical. Stating that “tribal identity politics is politics based on who a candidate is rather than on what he or she believes or argues for”, and that interest politics are “ based on the assumption that because of his or her race or ethnicity or gender a candidate might pursue an agenda that would advance the interests a voter is committed to.” Both forms of identity politics to some extent are rational and yet can be irrational depending on the views of an individual. With tribal identity politics no matter what positions of the candidate Stanley states, the steps is important to the history of the country. As far as interest identity politics there cannot be any justification or measure calculated that says a voter is wrong with choosing a candidate that interest them or relates to the interest of their own progression in the

Open Document