Stalinism And Communism

1322 Words3 Pages

Throughout the 1920s until 1953, Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union. He developed policies and ideas of legislation and governing the Soviet Union. The means of governance were referred as Stalinism since Joseph Stalin was the ruler of that political period and he was the pioneer of all the governmental policies. The Stalinism regime used the term to further differentiate operations from communism or socialism and the Leninist period during the Soviet power rule (Suny, 1998). Many scholars view Stalinism categorically as an example of Marxism and Leninism ideologies while other scholars hold that Stalinism separately stands on its own from socialist ideologies restricted from it. When Bukharinists was defeated in the political …show more content…

People were therefore relieved from laboring in order to access finances and material needs. Freedom from poverty would increase one's liberty to an increased ability to pursue intellectual interests while working voluntarily. Elimination of alienating labor depended on technological advancement in the means of production and this demanded an educated workforce. In the socialist, planned economy was experienced. The state dictated and coordinated the means of production and the distribution of goods and services to the entire economy. Wages of workers were determined according to their skills. In order to affect socialist, the Bolshevik government required rapid industrialization. Marxism recognized human nature and allowed consumerism to stimulate the communist economy of Bolshevik Russia (Medvedev, …show more content…

The approach presented by Lenin furthered nationalist war to further private economic expansion. According to Marxist- Leninism, domestic and international affairs of a country are one and not separate entities of human activities; therefore, he was in a position to put forward Liberal and Realist approaches towards international relations. The course of economic relations among countries and colonial emporium was an inevitable consequence when the monopoly capitalism avoided profitable competition. The ideology of new imperialism allowed the exploitation of high-profit investment to underdeveloped countries that were uneducated and had plentiful of raw materials to be

Open Document