Square Root Framework Of Project Management Essay

Atkinson (1999) in Project Management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other criteria, tries to define project management, and describes the criteria that guarantees project success. Many authors, association, etc. have defined project management differently. For example, “The British Standard for project manager defines project management as the planning, monitoring and control of all aspects of a project and the motivation of all those involved in it to achieve project objectives on time and to specified cost, quality, and performance” (Atkinson, 1999).

Whereas, the UK Association of Project Management (APM) defines project management as “ the planning, organization, monitoring, and control of all aspects of a project and motivation of all involved to achieve project objectives sagely and within agreed time, cost, and performance criteria. The project manger is single point of responsibility for achieving this” (Atkinson, 1999). These definitions were mainly based on “The Iron Triangle”: which includes time, cost, and quality. Atkinson (1999) argues on considering other

The Square Root framework includes Iron Triangle: cost, time, and quality; the information system: maintainability, reliability, validity, and information quality use; benefits (organization): improved efficiency, improved effectiveness, increased profits, strategic goals, organizational learning, and reduced waste; benefits (stakeholder community): satisfied user, social and environmental impact, personal development, professional learning, contractors, profits, capital, suppliers, content, project team, economic, and impact to surrounding community. However, considering all success criteria the most important factors to consider while measuring projects success are scope, time, cost, quality, and risks. These five elements play a essential role in project