Linguistic Perfection vs. Spoken Language Comprehension

1508 Words4 Pages

Issue 1
For a learner, it often seems natural to seek perfection of the language (Bygate 2000:30). They may try to convey the message using a full sentence and complex constructions. The speech of lower level speakers isn’t filled with reduced forms such as contraction, elision, assimilation, and reduction. They may not use weak forms, linking, assimilation or intrusion and consider reduced forms as signs of lazy or careless English. Though appropriate in written language, and to a certain extent in short-turn formal speech, such language may sound too formal in everyday conversations, causing unfriendliness and hostility from the listener. Moreover, they are unable to understand natural spoken language.

Issue 2
Cultural specificity plays …show more content…

The teacher asks the students to listen to single utterances from the conversation and define their functions according to their prosodic features, then listen to the whole recording and compare their answers. Then the students can produce dialogues (e.g. preparation for a party) developing the topic according the prosodic features of the listener’ reaction.

These activities are beneficial as they allow learners to notice the target language in meaningful context and raise their awareness of features of spoken language. Secondly, learners are exposed to the authentic conversation where speakers use them naturally. Finally, it brings the real world and experience into the classroom. Using an audioscript along with listening helps reinforce sound-spelling connections and makes it easier to notice patterns and regularities by reference to the written text than by trying to isolate them on a recording.

Approach 2 (issue …show more content…

And sets the context by asking questions like: Where do you think these people are? How well do they know each other? etc. T shows students the conversation and explains that the gaps mark the speaker B’s turn to show interest. In pairs/groups, have students discuss how they would fill in those gaps (either by using body language, noises and phrases). In open class, discuss the appropriateness of the responses students come up with. T asks them look at the useful phrases box and in pairs/groups have them complete the gaps using these new phrases. Then learners work in pairs and discuss where it’s possible to insert some fillers in the dialogue. When performing the dialogues, students should speak naturally, using appropriate expressiveness and intonation.
Open class feedback to address any lingering issues.

This activity will be particularly important with multicultural classes or when the teacher and the students do not share the L1. The class discussion stage will help determine what is acceptable in a first, fairly formal conversation with someone from the students’ country versus what is expected in an English speaking environment. Follow-up on this activity could be in the form of a role play to reinforce showing interest.

Approach 3 (issues 2, 3,

Open Document