More handpicked essays just for you.
Spain vs england colonization
Compare and contrast european colonization
Spanish versus British colonization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although there are some similarities between the two nations, England and Spain are easily the most opposite when their colonists are compared to each other. First, the similarities between the two are in their treatment of the Native Americans. Depending on the Spanish conquistador or expedition leader, the Natives may have been treated fairly or poorly. In the same way, British colonial governors sometimes had good relationships with the Natives (William Penn and Roger Williams), while others helped provoke wars with the tribes (James Moore). The contrast between Spanish and English colonists is in their spirit and reason for colonization. The Spaniards were seeking riches and were usually loyal to the Crown, starting in the 16th century
Between the settlement of Jamestown in 1607 and the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the most important change that occurred in the colonies was the emergence of a society quite different from that in England. Changes in religion, economics, politics, and social structure illustrate this Americanization of the transplanted Europeans.
Chesapeake and Plymouth were two of the three early English colonies. While both colonies were located in Massachusetts, and founded around the same time frame, they both had very separate ways of controlling and overseeing the way their colonies were managed. Chesapeake, established around 1630, was given to Lord Baltimore, also known as George Calvert, by King Charles l. This colony brought over many English men as indentured servants. These men received a chance at living in America, and the population already there, received more help. Plymouth was then founded shortly after in 1620. It was the last of the three English colonies to be established. Having watched and learned from the first two colonies, they had an advantage being last
Not all colonial powers were equal. The French and the English (Puritans and Pilgrims), for example, differed in their justifications for colonization, how specific Native American tribes viewed them, and in their initial reasons for settling. Overall, the French were viewed more favorably by the Native populations with whom they were allied, were more tenacious in their religious conversion attempts, and had far fewer colonists than the English.
American Colonies: Contrasting the New England and Southern Colonists The New England and Southern Colonies were both settled largely by the English. By 1700, the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. The southern colonies have characteristics that are the antithesis of the New England colonies attributes. New England was colonized for Freedom of Worship and freedom of political thought.
They formed many colonies that became very successful and were able to provide for themselves as well. Spain, France, and Great Britain all colonized North America seeking money and trade. Spain differed in their strategy to colonize because it was more religiously motivated than France and Great Britain. France’s colonial strategy was to create trade, and tried to avoid cultural centers, or large populations, which made it very hard to enforce what they wanted done. Many of France’s colonies were either dispersed from wars or were sold. Great Britain’s colonial strategy was to create colonies that were able to thrive, to create trade, and extend their empire. Many of the colonies were able to thrive and sustain life without the need for much help. They were able to create trade through their colonies producing goods and shipping them back overseas to them. Also, the number of colonies Great Britain had made it easy to extend their empire in North
When it comes down to comparing and contrasting Native American and Spanish civilization, there is actually a variety of things that make each one stand out from one another. When looking into both the Natives and the Spanish there was more to be found different then there was to be similar in any way. Both societies struggled, but one did have more of an advantage which is why there was such conflict between the two.
Often in history textbooks the British are casted in an evil light, while the American colonist are se...
The Spanish and English cultures were scarcely similar and notably different because of the interaction with indigenous people and the timing in which the interactions occurred. The Spanish and English were very different in how they interacted with the indigenous people. The Spanish main reason for coming to North America was to spread Catholicism. In the Catholic church if two people were both Catholic then the two people would receive the sacrament of marriage. After marriage the two would create a Catholic of their own. This had created 5 new races of people. The races of humanity was then looked at as social classes. The highest social class was a full white European, then a mestizos, which was a someone who was European and an Indian, followed by Indians, African slaves, and lastly a Zambos,
The relationship between Britain and American colonies during 1660 and 1750 was cut both ways.It takes place at England and the American colonies between 1660-1750. Britain and the colonies had a lot of conflicts of how the colonies should run how the American colonies could be control, and how much freedom should the colonist have without England. The relationships that were affected by King James ll and King Charles ll which caused Mary and William to kick out King James ll and King Charles ll to send the glorious revolution and allow new religion to come along. Politics in the colonies which involved the minorities, their economics, and how they were after the Glorious Revolution in the colonies. Revolution was a time of war and new ideas from war of Jenkins's Ear to Enlightenment. England tries to win back the colonist trust and relationship with freedom and new laws after the relationship was destroyed.
3. The French and Spanish colonies were both established for different reasons. The French colonies were established as trading posts. Most of the population of the French colonies were merchants, fur traders, and missionaries. Later French colonies followed in the path of trading posts as well. The Spanish colonies were established because of the conquests Spain underwent. They would go out and claim and take over land on their conquests, and that would expand their empire. Most of the southwest and southern regions were claimed by Spain. Spain's population was mostly missionaries, conquistadors, and soldiers.
The relations between English and Latin America from the late 1700s to the mid-1800s are a study of disparities and conflicts. From the founding of the thirteen English colonies in the north and the Spanish and Portuguese colonies to the south, the differences were readily apparent. The English and Latin colonies operated under different forms of governance, believed in different forms of Christianity, and realized independence through different avenues, among other differences. These incongruences, and the tension that resulted, only increased as the colonies gained their independence.
During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies.
During the late 16th century and into the 17th century, European nations rapidly colonized the newly discovered Americas. England in particular sent out numerous groups to the eastern coast of North America to two regions. These two regions were known as the Chesapeake and the New England areas. Later, in the late 1700's, these two areas would bond to become one nation. Yet from the very beginnings, both had very separate and unique identities. These differences, though very numerous, spurred from one major factor: the very reason the settlers came to the New World. This affected the colonies in literally every way, including economically, socially, and politically.
The Conquest of New Spain Cortés came not to the New World to conquer by force, but by manipulation. Bernal Daz del Castillo, in the "Conquest of New Spain," describes how Cortés and his soldiers manipulated the Aztec people and their king Montezuma from the time they traveled from Iztapalaopa to the time when Montezuma took Cortés to the top of the great Cue and showed him the whole of Mexico and its countryside, and the three causeways which led into Mexico. Castillo's purpose for recording the mission was to keep an account of the wealth of Montezuma and Mexico, the traditions, and the economic potential that could benefit Cortés' upcoming conquest. However, through these recordings, we are able to see and understand Cortés' strategy in making Mexico "New Spain." He came as a wolf in sheep's clothing and manipulated Montezuma through his apparent innocence.
There were a myriad of differences between Great Britain and her American colonies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but these differences can be divided into three basic categories: economic, social, and political. The original American settlers came to the colonies for varied reasons, but a common trait among these settlers was that they still considered themselves British subjects. However, as time passed, the colonists grew disenfranchised from England. Separated from the king by three thousand miles and living in a primitive environment where obtaining simple necessities was a struggle, pragmatism became the common thread throughout all daily life in the colonies. It was this pragmatism that led the colonists to create their own society with a unique culture and system of economics and politics.