Soviet Union's Pavilion Analysis

1854 Words4 Pages

National Tensions between the Soviets and the Nazi’s through Architecture

The 1937 Paris Exposition Internationale des Arts et Techniques dans la Vie Moderne

An example of the architecture Hitler strived for can be seen in the 1937 Paris exposition. The task given to the 45 invited countries was to create a pavilion representing their ideas for a new style of architecture. Most of these pavilions were devoted to the cinema, to radio, light, the railway, flight, refrigeration, and printing (Culturedarm, 2018). Germany, the Soviet Union, and Italy all took this opportunity to present their national and political stances through their architecture. However, the German pavilion was located directly opposite the Soviet Union’s pavilion and …show more content…

Germany placed a small golden eagle atop their pavilion, whilst the Soviet Union pavilion displayed a large sculpture of a man and a woman holding a sickle and hammer; the symbol of communism. To counter the Soviet’s large sculpture, Albert Speer (Hitler’s chief architect) emphasised the verticality of Germany’s pavilion as if he were creating a wall which the Soviet sculpture could not pass. It can be seen in Figure 1, that the German pavilion is slightly taller than the Soviet Union’s. It also had a more imposing form due to its height and width. Speer described his pavilion as a cubic mass which embodied stout pillars to stop the triumphant stride of the Soviet Union’s figures toward the German pavilion (P. 397, Geyer and Fitzpatrick, …show more content…

Utopia - “An imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.”

A utopia is an individual’s vision and perception of a perfect society and architecture. However; an individual cannot design a utopia for a group of people because that utopia will only suit the individual. Karl Marx and Friedrich Hayek state that utopianism demands the removal of an individual to have a clear contextual consideration and understanding of rationality (Sciabarra, 1995, P.19-20). However, this is impossible to do and therefore a utopia can often be viewed as a dystopia. Conversely, Eberhard Zeidler suggests that a utopian city can only be realised in a society that has a totalitarian political system to enforce the changes (Zeidler, 1985, P.143) and thus, worked in favor of Mussolini, Stalin and Hitler.

The Three

Open Document