Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abstract expressionism essay
Essays on abstract expressionism
Essays on abstract expressionism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Cliche as it may be, this maxim holds true throughout the world, whether it be in regards to celebrities, cars, rural lanscapes, gritty cityscapes, your co-worker’s children, or your father-in-law’s turkey carving skills. Holding differing points of view in regards to what is considered beauty is something that humanity has argued over for centuries. What one sees as merely a rundown subway car, another may see the small sparks of creativity in the walls’ grafitti, the colorful bursts of commuters’ clothing, the sheer beauty of humanity itself in the hidden spaces of the train. Discussions over what is truly beautiful are common throughout humanity’s history, though nowhere are they as obvious or as well documented as they are in the art world. Sonia Gechtoff is known for her abstract expressionist painitings and drawings, a genre that, for many, you either love or hate. For me, it’s works like hers that allow me to enjoy a style of paininting that I’m not otherwise drawn to. Though I enjoy her work, her paintings may not be considered beautiful in the traditional sense by many. …show more content…
Using such a largge canvas gave her room to lay out a background of solid black dotted with small streaks of white, without making the outward reaching tangle of colors in the center feel too claustrophobic. Instead,the size givs it a sense of distance, as if we’re watching an explosion from a ways away, rather than being caught up in the middle of a blazing firestorm; close enough for it to feel personal, but not enough to be threatening. And her choice of oil lends itself as well - such a frantic sense of movement wouldnt have been as well articulated through something like watercolor. Oil paints have a sense of weight and depth to them rthat lets Etya seem to have a depth to it, despite being an abstract painting with no true figures within to give a sense of three dimesionality
They are durable and inexpensive comparing to canvas.The artwork shows the happy emotions and realism with his interpretation of his wife and himself. Color theme of the painting was blue and background/negative space is dark blue. His right side of face is dark blue to show the shadow of his face and distance perspective. He used the black line which is stained glass like to separate the negative space/positive space. He used dark blue green for negative space on the Masonite board. Texture of oil painting is rough and we can trace of the paint brush stroke. They give the vivid or liveliness that he was well known of. The figures are realistic and impressionism style rather than photogenic. The title of paining and sub title of paining itself tell the story of artwork. Esther looks very relaxed, content and happy. Rattner looks happy , passionate, proud of himself as well. He certainly looks overcame the grief of death of his first wife. This painting gives warm feeling even though the theme color is cool color blue because of two figures of face expressions and relaxed body
He clarifies his interpretation of aesthetic value, rejecting the traditionally narrow notions regarding beauty and composition, and expands his view to include insights and emotions expressed through the medium. Explaining that he views overall value as an all-things-considered judgement, he asserts the ethicist’s duty to contrast the aesthetic with the ethical and determine the extent to which one outweighs the other. Gaut calls on readers to defy the popular paradigm equating beauty with goodness and ugly with evil, allowing for great, yet flawed pieces of
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Frida Kahlo is known for the most influential Latin American female artist. She is also known as a rebellious feminist. Kahlo was inspired to paint after her near-death bus incident when she was 17. After this horrendous incident that scarred her for life, she went under 35 different operations. These operations caused her extreme pain and she was no longer able to have kids. Kahlo’s art includes self portraits of her emotions, pain, and representations of her life. Frida Kahlo was an original individual, not only in her artwork but also in her
It appears to me that pictures have been over-valued; held up by a blind admiration as ideal things, and almost as standards by which nature is to be judged rather than the reverse; and this false estimate has been sanctioned by the extravagant epithets that have been applied to painters, and "the divine," "the inspired," and so forth. Yet in reality, what are the most sublime productions of the pencil but selections of some of the forms of nature, and copies of a few of her evanescent effects, and this is the result, not of inspiration, but of long and patient study, under the instruction of much good sense…
Before analysing selected art works in more detail it will be worth introducing a few different definitions and hypothesis of aesthetics in art based on theories of well-known critical thinkers.
Let's start the essay from the understanding of art by Leo Tolstoy (1828-1920). He still holds that for people art is beauty and beauty are something which imparts the sense of pleasure and satisfaction. The author still accepts the argument, though the notion is purely subjective in nature.
When the painting is viewed too fast and not studied at all, the lady looks stressed, sad and angry. But after a closer evaluation, one will began to understand that her face expresses the opposite feelings; she has a relaxed gaze, pleased look, and a calming appearance. In her surroundings, the colorful flowers, green grass, and green bushes enhance the woman’s calming presence. Without careful observation, one will walk on by and not notice the meaning and important details of the painting. The painting as a whole is subtle, but with a bold meaning. When I first looked at the painting, I went straight to the next art piece, but then my professor began to talk about the painting and I began to refocus and study her face and her surroundings. I was quickly reminded of the elements of nature that I love. After the initial glance, Schwichtenberg captures the audience’s attention and reminds them to be in the present moment
When looking at a piece of art a sense of wonder and beauty bewitches the beholder.
From stick figures in the sand and the earliest animals painted and carved in stone, individuals worldwide have responded to the world by using images. The ultimate goal line of art, especially in the past, was to transport meaning and express important ideas, enlightening what was significant to every civilization, by eye-catching images. In be familiar with the subject matter of any painting, you have to look at the artist's objectives, which are regularly connected to social conditions, national or global issues and the demands of the public. To avoid the drawbacks of judging all art by our own personal experiences and personal views, we have to learn the background surrounding the artist when the work was created- that being the social and historical conditions of the time and the logical views which affected the way in which the artist viewed the world. Art is as wide-ranging as the life from which it springs and each artist represents different characteristics of the world they know. For a split second, it may be said that artists paint to find out reality and to generate direction. The inventors of art make innovations about the marvels and exquisiteness of nature and the poise and graciousness of man. They give these concepts an order to help us understand life in a greater depth. In understanding the history and style of any period of art, we have to understand the equilibrium between social and political development of that particular era. World matters have been mirrored in art throughout the ages.
I disagree with Ludwig Wittgenstein when he states that aesthetics “draws one’s attention to certain features, to place things side by side so as to exhibit these features” because of the logic that gives birth to the thoughts that led to this statement. This logic questions the ability of a person to ascertain what “beauty” is, what contains the quality known as “beauty”, and the levels of beauty and how they can be measured and compared.
Firstly Hume’s idea of ‘agreeableness’ of a work art shall be addressed, and how the idea of the test of time can result in unanimity of in aesthetic judgement as evidence that there can be an objective standard for aesthetic judgement. This shall be confirmed by examining Hume’s non-cognitivist account of aesthetic judgement proposing that no properties of objects can make them viable candidates for aesthetic evaluation, only the immediate and spontaneous reactions that they can evoke from us can. After this has been established it will then be shown that due to the shared nature of the human species, such aesthetic sentiments can display reasonable uniformity. Although it will have already been established that a uniformity of taste exists, it will be discussed how aesthetic sentiments can be improved by a sound understanding of what is being appreciated, as it is possible for some aesthetic judgments to be better than others, through aesthetic judgment of individuals that Hume regards as being good critics, who have well-tuned aesthetic sensibilit...
The arts, are a window to the past they allow our current society to understand the thoughts and visions of previous artists and their movements. It is through the idealization of the form or the use of expressive and chaotic brush stokes that we are able to understand the purpose of a piece and acknowledge the metamorphosis art has undergone over the course of time. Both the visual and preforming arts serve as a vehicle of communication, we see how artists use powerful images express some of the most complex thoughts, opinions, and human emotions. It can be said, that art is a source of cultural enlightenment that allows us to understand the values and views of a certain region or group without having a firsthand experience. Art has been used in many different manners, “the glorification of religion, propaganda, symbolism, and” as a reflection of societies flaws and virtues. Humankind is not able to survive without basic resources such as food, water, and shelter; and it certainly cannot exist without art. From the very beginning of mankind humans have craved and indulged in any fo...
When questioning something as controversial as the possibility of a standard of aesthetic judgment, one must take into account the many different perspectives that already exist on the matter. For centuries now, some of the greatest philosophers such as David Hume and Immanuel Kant have attempted to answer this timeless question. However, understandings and interpretations of art are constantly evolving. This has made a clear concise answer difficult to find. Throughout this essay, I will discuss previous opinions and beliefs on the matter, primarily focusing on the ides of philosopher David Hume, then touching on Noel Carroll’s critique of Hume’s philosophy, and then go into further detail of my own analysis of the question.
Art is one of the unique ways of communication which may be the reason why not everyone could understand why colors, shapes, sounds, movements, etc. can mean a lot if understood, and it’s incomprehensible with the use of words; not to mention, if people get the opportunity to judge creation of beauty like a test-paper, probably the history of art and facts we know these days would have been fabricated, sugar-coated, lies, and fraud. It may also seem that we have not achieved the beauty of creations of our fellow ancestors at