Son By Andrew Solomon Abnormality Summary

1609 Words4 Pages

The Exploitation of Abnormality The principle of homogenization lies within the foundation of every society, creating standards for which the individual must follow in order to be culturally accepted. Whether being due to a specific birth defect or simply to their unique nature, individuals incapable of meeting these standards are judged upon their social shortcomings. In the article “Son,” Andrew Solomon defines these abnormalities as one’s horizontal identity which consists of personally acquired traits that often separate a person from the rest of society. Unfortunately, the cultural desire of normality has led to a negative perception of individuality and has created an opportunity which institutions commonly exploit. Regardless of their …show more content…

This philosophy can be dually noted through both the actions of the Japanese pharmaceutical companies as well as the institution of family provided through the example of Andrew Solomon’s mother. Japanese pharmaceutical institutions that often attempt to justified their actions of promoting depression in Japan by claiming that, “[they don't] present themselves as people driven only by profits.Rather [they see] themselves as acting with the best intentions. ”(Watters 527), are equally selfish to Solomon’s mother who Solomon states, “didn’t want [him] to be gay because she taught thought it wouldn't be the happiest course for him,but equally, she didn't like her image as the mother of a gay son” (Solomon 376). Both the pharmaceutical companies desire of achieving personal wealth and Solomon’s mother’s desire to maintain her social stature lied prevalent to their desire to help the individual. In the the case of the Japanese pharmaceutical company, they had been forcing the idea of a disease upon a nation in order to sell them a drug which they did not need, whereas Solomon’s mother had been shadowing her child’s horizontal identity in order to not jeopardize her own well being. If both institutions were as committed to the well being of the individual as they claimed, there would have …show more content…

Institutional tendencies to act upon prejudice prove that the vast majority of institutions do not care for the lives of the individual but rather are only concerned on their own financial or physical well being. The false concept that institutions withhold the individual’s best interesest can be disproven time and time again by closely examining most institution’s inability to provide concrete ethical justifications for their actions. Institution’s ability to manipulate cultural standards to its’s favor commonly leads to the individual suffering from exploitation in order to avoid the undesirable discrimination and torment that accompanies the possession of an

Open Document