Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of constitutional interpretation
The creation of the us constitution
U.s. constitution then and now
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of constitutional interpretation
Flux is the nature and salvation of our society, yet our individual natures, our
intellects and consciences fight entropy. As we seek stability, safety and justice in the
institution of law, and when those laws grow of necessity to address the issues of our
times, the interpretation of our forefathers’ constitutional intent can become obscured by
time and ambiguity. Indeed, our liberties today are won and lost not with blood on some
revolutionary battlefield, but with semantics. Although judicial interpretation of the right
of the people to peaceably assemble has led to the allowance of municipalities to require
assembly permits, some of the repercussions of such mandates have grossly narrowed the
ability of the public to exercise that right. We will make an exploration of the unintended
consequences and limitations of constitutional rights, brought about by such permits.
However, before we proceed, because the application of the constitution in
modern law is based on judicial interpretation, we should, for the sake of clarity, define
our terms.
As it is used in the U.S. Constitution, “assembly” is defined as: the coming
together of people for a common purpose. Interestingly, the same definition could be
ascribed to society. In fact, what action is more productive and fundamentally human
thanassembly? As governed by law, the word assembly refers to gatherings ranging in
function from labor rallies, impromptu “soap box” dialogs, and political protests, to
community picnics, and the music festivals in your public park. The wording of the first
amendment is that “Congress shall make no law …..abridging ……. the right of the
people peaceably to assemble“...
... middle of paper ...
...se of that
right and the subjugation of citizens in such a manner, although not interpreted as
unconstitutional, is surely against the spirit of liberty. As broadly as the liberties are
stated in the constitution, so too can they be broadly abused with poor or reckless
interpretation.
Works Cited
Andy Stapleton
Washington State Legislative Facilities Office
(360) 786 - 7079
Tabatha Abu El-Haj, ”The Neglected Right of Assembly”
Ari Kletzky, “What is Peaceable Assembly or the Right of Assembly?”
Richard Moore, “County lawyers won't commit to constitutionality of new code Large-assembly ordinance “likely” defensible, attorneys tell supervisors” The Lakeland Times 11/26/2010
...udicial branch of the American government must be checked by the legislatures of states. To prevent instances like this from reoccurring, it is essential for state legislatures to take preventative steps and draft bills that would further limit the ability of the government to appropriate private property while still protecting private property owners. At the federal level, since it is abundantly clear from the case of Midkiff that the Supreme Court will defer to the Congress to define “public use,” a constitutional remedy needs to take place in the form of an amendment to the Constitution. It would be essential that an amendment to the Public Use Clause would specify the guidelines and standards of a “public use” to preserve the original intent of the legislative authors and provide the necessary private property protection to which all all Americans have a right.
Typically the most basic civil liberties are found in a country’s bill of rights and then that country passes amendments as needed in order to grow the peoples’ civil liberties, or shrink them if need be. Now, in the case of the United States the people are not “granted“ civil liberties by the...
A great deal of bills have been written and passed as legislation under the pretense that they would better outline the citizen’ rights and ensure their freedoms. Yet occasionally these laws are created with disregard to what is stated in our Constitution. At times they distort and twist the original meaning of the work, counter acting the purpose of creating the Amendments. The intention of Amendments was to be an outline of the rights of the people. They were to ensure that there would not be a repeat of what the framers had experienced when they set out on their mission to draft a document that would govern our country for years to come. Little by little our elected officials have been discounting our Constitution. There are many resulting repercussions; the most dear to everyone being the individuals rights. The end result of these interpretations being that our people are hurt, as we are slowly being stripped of our rights as U.S. citizens.
2. Was the Chicago ordinance, as defined in this case, unconstitutional in its contents because it failed to provide support for the First Amendment?
Gunther, G. (1991). Constitutional Law. Twelfth Edition. New York: The Foundation Press, Inc. pp. 1154-1161.
the laws it chooses, 2. the rule of law, which says that laws must be
not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the
Kanovitz, J. R. (2010). Constitutional Law (12th ed.). (E. R. Ebben, Ed.) New Providence, NJ,
Constitutional Law was created as the chosen way to preserve the United States of America Constitution, ratified by Congress in 1783, in respect to its meanings, use, and enforcement, for free government, and equal justice under the law for all Americans. However, as times and generations have passed, the U.S. Constitution remains the supreme law of the land. Among the most contemporary and controversial elements are the challenges of evolving interpretations of the freedom of speech, and search warrants, which have both had a major impact on society. In particular, we explore speech not protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution, as well as some circumstances when a search warrant is not required for a valid search. A conclusion is drawn and outlined based on research conducted to offer a concise in-depth observation of the above topics.
Today, we take such freedoms as the right to privacy and freedom of speech for granted. Our freedoms are not absolute, without limitations. Thus, when it comes to these freedoms, it is up to the Supreme Court to determine what the government can and cannot regulate. Because courts continually rule on what actions are constitutional and what is not, judicial interpretation shapes the nature of civil liberties. “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” (Voltaire)
laws is to keep the bad things out from the old society out such as
Nation the right to boast of fairness and justice being served without conflicting with personal
laws made by others in our society, and decide whether or not the laws we make
Frank A. Easterbrook, ‘Legal Interpretation and the Power of the Judiciary’ [1984] 7 Harv. J.L. Pub. Pol’y 87 http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hjlpp7&div=18&id=&page= accessed 14 February 2012. J. A. Holland & Julian Webb, Learning Legal Rules, 6th edn, Oxford 2006, pp. 113-117.
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.