Sodomy Debate

611 Words2 Pages

Debates between two apposing parties may be extremely vigorous and hurtful. Especially to those effected [personally] by the beliefs of those debates and disputes. Although each person is subject to their own opinion, however, there should be formal discussion of reasons for their faith in a certain pro/con. In my educational institution, I often come across a group whom denounces my sexuality and lifestyle. As the conflict continues, remaining steadfast and strong is a difficult task. I disagree with their sentiments of how discretely men and women should act and love. They protest against any other form of sexual orientation apart from heterosexuality. Homophobes are against homosexuality because of said ability to love, religion, and have their own insecurities and uneducated stance in the topic.
First of all, this group detests the concept of homosexuality. Any form of intercourse between homosexuals and themselves is strictly forbidden because of the "sins" committed by the "sexually immoral". The impression they receive is that Sodomy and Sodomizing someone is an inappropriate act which is only committed by couples of the same sex. Dissipation between both sides of the debate (which is ongoing), both agree "Sodomy" is an irrelevant term because of its historical inaccuracy …show more content…

Radicals and other members of the homophobic society have no awareness of the growing support. They remain uneducated because of their barbaric tendencies to be afraid of the new. The unknown is the cause for fear upon uncivilized people and networks. Without the proper education and awareness in schools and communities, the progression of a more civilized people cannot be possible. As this "hate nation" continues with prosecutions that possess no just stance, they become less faithful toward their neighbors, communities, governments, and ultimately the natural order of the

Open Document