Sociotechnical Systems and Management Styles
In today’s advanced technological workplace, companies are looking into several new management styles and concepts. Among them is a theory called sociotechnical systems (STS). This is a theory that has been around for about 50 years and is still being attempted for use today. Many managers along with one member of the STS founding team, Fred Emery, argue that STS is obsolete; other managers have implemented STS with great success. With this new style of management practice, several changes will have to take place. These changes along with several examples of both positive and negative effects will be examined throughout this essay.
To introduce the STS theory and let the reader get an understanding of just what is involved in STS, it is imperative to list several changes that must take place for an effective STS strategy to work. A few changes in the old management style in comparison with STS are listed below: 1
Old
-Technology first
-People as extensions of machines
-Maximum task breakdown, simple, narrow skills
-External controls: procedures, supervisors, specialist staffs
-More organization levels, autocratic style: unilateral goal setting, assignment of workers
-Frequent alienation: “It’s only a job”
-Less individual development opportunity and employment security STS
-Joint optimization of systems
-People as complements to machines
-Optimal task grouping, multiple, broad skills
-Internal controls: self-regulating subsystems
-Fewer levels, participative style: Bilateral goal setting
-Commitment: “It’s my job, group, and organization”
-More individual development opportunity and employment security
As seen above, many changes are nece...
... middle of paper ...
...John Hoerr and Michael Pollock. “Management Discovers the Human Side of Automation.” Taken from Business Week. (1986), p. 1
http://organizationdesign.com/pages/articles2/auto.html
10 John Hoerr and Michael Pollock. “Management Discovers the Human Side of Automation.” Taken from Business Week. (1986), p. 2 http://organizationdesign.com/pages/articles2/auto.html
11 John Hoerr and Michael Pollock. “Management Discovers the Human Side of Automation.” Taken from Business Week. (1986), p. 1 http://organizationdesign.com/pages/articles2/auto.html
12 Pasmore, William. Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. New York: 1998.
13 Jacobs, D.A. and Keating C.B. “Process Analysis and Personnel Development Program. Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA, April 1998.
14 Zell, Deone. Changing by Design. Cornell University Press, 2000.
Both of these two chapters analyze the effects of automation on two different types of professions. I found it interesting that individuals working as reservation agents find it easier to cope with automation than McDonald's employees. I guess this is due to the fact that reservation agents are allowed to practice a little more individual thinking than someone waiting for a buzzer telling him or her when to flip a meat patty.
Krill, Paul. "The Age of the Sentient Machine Is upon Us." InfoWorld. 14 Mar. 2013. Web.
The root causes of the organizational issues at the Engstrom Auto Mirror plant are clear and obvious. After reading and rereading the article by Beer and Collins (2008), it appears that the main root causes of Engstrom Auto Mirror’s productivity problems are the economy, a lack of needed employees, and finally, Bent’s failure to keep open communication and positive behavioral theories like neo-classical organizational theory and systems theory alive in the organization. The economic downturn in the auto mirror industry and the subsequent layoffs of 46 workers (around 18 percent of its workforce) caused Engstrom Auto Mirror’s production and product quality to fall behind, leading to the disgruntlement of Bent’s employees. The company had promised
Brooks, R. A. 2003. Prologue, In: Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us, Vintage.
Persoon, T.J., Zaleski, S., & Frerichs, J., (2006) Improving preanalytic processes using the principles of lean production (Toyota Production System). Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Oct;3(9):278-78. 2006 Jan;125(1):16-25.
Papazian, Dennis R. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Technology: Master or Slave?. University of Michigan-Dearborn, 1992. Web. 12 Nov. 2013. .
Robots are important to humans in the workforce, even though, it may not appear so. In Better than Humans: Why Robots Will- and Must- Take Our Jobs, Kelly initially unsettles the reader by noting that our, “job [will be] taken by machines”- if not already taken (Kelly 300). The reason why
Throughout the article, Ford uses data to provide information on the current state of unemployment. He notes that from analysis, it was determined that the U.S. market is highly polarized from existing technology. Because of this polarization, it will be challenging for workers to find new jobs, if AI becomes more widespread and used. Ford concludes that, “it becomes somewhat difficult to imagine just what jobs might be left for even the most capable human works” if AI ever matches or exceeds human intelligence.
Michie, Donald and Johnston, Rory. The Knowledge Machine. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Man. William Morrow and Company, Inc., NY., 1985.
"The human aspiration to create intelligent machines has appeared in myth and literature for thousands of years, from stories of Pygmalion to the tales of the Jewish Golem." Anat Treister-Goren, Ph.D. (http://www.a-i.com/)
Partridge, Derek and K. M. Hussain. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and BUSINESS MANAGMENT. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corparation, 1992.
Strohmeyer, Robert. “Total Autonomy—The next generation of thinking machines.” Ziff Davis Smart Business for the New Economy. 1 August 2000. 50
Williams, Gray ?Robots and Automation.? The new book of popular science. Grolier Inc., 1996, 186-94.
It took 12 years to perfect his system. His system was based on tasks and that each worker’s assignments should be pre-planned by management. Each job shoul...