Social Rights: Three Differences Between Rights And Responsibilities

737 Words2 Pages

Differences Between Rights and Responsibilities Our century gave people real freedom: we cannot simply demand the protection of our rights, but also refer to the legislative acts adopted by the entire civilized world. This was the first time in the history of mankind. However, it is already noticeable that absolutisation liberties lead to negative consequences: “legal extremism”, the emergence of dependency, parasitism. In a developed society rights necessarily agree responsibilities, and it becomes the most important key to development of the state. What are the differences between rights and responsibilities; what is primary, and what is secondary? As is known, there are three main differences between rights and responsibilities: the imperative, the responsibility, and the group of people. …show more content…

First, it is important to know the definition of the rights and responsibilities. Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement, and responsibilities-a set of mandatory standards, the failure of which entails statutory responsibility. The imperative means that the use of our rights is an opportunity, and compliance with responsibilities is a necessity. For example, every person has the right to life, education, housing, vacation, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and so on. Thus, it is clear that man is absolutely free in the performance of his or her rights; moreover, no one can deprive him or her of these rights. On the other hand, there is a huge amount of human responsibilities, but the main of them are the responsibility to respect and obey the Constitution and laws, pay taxes and fees, preserve nature and the environment, and much more. Perhaps, it is obvious that people should abide by their dates no matter what. Otherwise, people who shirk their responsibilities entail statutory

More about Social Rights: Three Differences Between Rights And Responsibilities

Open Document