Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social corporate responsibility
Social corporate responsibility
Short note on corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social corporate responsibility
Given than society is changing fast, environments within it can also be expected to be continuously changing (Bauman, 2005, 2011). However, ensuring that the benefit of continuous development occurs without it degrading the environment remains a challenge. It is within this perspective, of constantly changing environments, that organizational change has been recognized as a subject within organizational behaviour studies.
Among contemporary topics of organization behaviour is corporate social responsibility (CSR). This is a contemporary topic given that calls from society and political leaders for greater individual and corporate social responsibility are increasing (McShane, & Von Glinow, 2008).
It is no news that demands for people to donate time, money and get involved in social causes have existed for centuries. What is more, this trend is advancing and improving, especially with the empowerment of non-governmental organizations (or NGOs) and the expansion of fair-trade and the responsible-investment movement (Benaubou, & Tirole, 2010; Mohr, Webb, & Harris, 2001).
Contemporary organizations operate under a variety of financial, legal, social, technological, environmental and ethical pressures and search for different ways of executing their activities successfully (Petinger, 2010; McShane, & Von Glinow, 2008; Burnes, 2004). Though it is still questioned whether organizations have social responsibilities beyond their financial goals, there are today increasing internal and external demands on business organizations to achieve broader social responsibility ( Freeman, Pica, & Camponovo, 2001).
This assignment considers CSR as a response to social change faced by organizations in modern societies. Within this perspective th...
... middle of paper ...
... and pressure from society and stakeholders, businesses are going about their financial activities more consciously of changing social values and social priorities.
In contemporary societies, stakeholders communities are interested not only in issues that affect their own welfare (e.g., employees calling for improved health and safety measures, for fair treatment) but also in issues that affect them indirectly (e.g., consumers supporting fair trade products and environmental conservation).
CSR is a major management concern. It requires business organizations to both handle risks and opportunities when engaging in CSR activities, mainly with respect to their brand reputation and the general engagement of stakeholders. More than ever before, it can be argued that nowadays’ stakeholders are a key feature of any business wanting to operate successfully and survive.
Social responsibility can be defined as “the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Mallen Baker, 2004). In addition, social responsibility has been defined differently by various corporate leaders that provide guidelines which impacts how one manages the core business. Social responsibility is an essential part of a business. If managed correctly should strengthen the competitive spirit of the company and provide prosperity to society.
It demonstrates that there can be no universal approach that would suit all relatively similar organizations. First of all, management always has to consider mentality, values, and norms existing in their local community, while also keeping in mind the attitudes existing in other communities and in the global market. At the same time, internal interests are no less significant in this matter, which is why great sensitivity is needed in the process of CSR creation and establishment. Thus, this article addresses both internal and external aspects of CSR as the parts of inseparable whole. It does not have independent and divided sections for each part as they are discussed in connection to one another, which is a realistic representation of an organizational decision-making process. In this way, the authors provide a practically applicable guideline that may be used to determine the most suitable CSR initiative, the methods of communicating this initiative to stakeholders, the resources that can and should be used, and the ways to involve stakeholders in the process of implementation as active participants rather than mere
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
Consideration of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) would be a start in analyzing if this trend is ethical or unethical. Extra attention on legal responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, and philanthropic responsibilities were
Earlier research by Bhattacharya and Sen (2004) showed that informing stakeholders is the only way to positively influence the attitude and behaviour of stakeholders regarding the organization and its CSR policies and/or business activities. Positively influence of the attitude and behaviour of stakeholders is also important organisations want to attract highly skilled and qualified workers. This is important because “the success of a business ultimately relies on the type of employees who work there (Blackman, 2006, p. 367)”.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Milton Friedman presents a compelling argument in “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits” by arguing that businesses need to focus only on increasing their profits and integrating social responsibility will only hurt them as a company. Since “only people can have responsibilities” (Friedman 52), Friedman argues that businesses as a whole do not have any type of real responsibilities because there is not a singular person for these responsibilities to fall on. Corporate executives are people as well and may feel they have social responsibilities to society but these “are the social responsibilities of individuals, not of business” (51). In terms of corporations, the businessmen are the ones that hold the responsibility of the company. Friedman argues that the only responsibility these managers hold is to those who own the corporation, the shareholders. If the individuals themselves want to contribute to social responsibility they must do it with their own money in their personal lives, but they should not use social responsibility in
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Initial, companies dedicated to CSR plans and strategies should generate initiatives that are reliable with their own company identities and that are perceived as unselfish programmes that augment corporate trustworthiness. Both coherence and motivational attributions are the main forerunners of helpful perceptions with customers and of intensification the customer---company nexus.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very familiar term in today’s world. Most of the successful companies try to be ethical and socially responsible toward their stakeholders. Because becoming ethical and socially responsible gains a lot in terms of profit or capturing more market share (Aras and Crowther,2009). This socially responsible approach is paved by the CSR activities of the companies which has a great contribution to their corporate strategy of winning the customers’ mind. In this assignment, the pros and corn of CSR activities of a particular organization a...
Covey & Brown (2001) “the role of business in society has progressed over the years, from being primarily concerned with profit for sharehold¬ers to a stakeholder and community approach with a focus on corporate social responsibility”
The arguments for and against corporate social responsibility have captured two points of view. Those who believe that organizations should not be concerned about social responsibility base many of their arguments on the costs involved and whether organizations should shoulder those costs on behalf of society. And those who are in favor feel that organizations benefit from society and, therefore, have an obligation to improve it. Although there is no universal agreement, surveys and other reports express that many organizations are, becoming increasingly active in addressing social
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...