Social Boundaries In Dostoevsky's Crime And Puni

762 Words2 Pages

Raskolnikov is the quintessential modern man who places his faith in a radical idea. He believes that the only way for him to express his identity is by breaking established boundaries. According to Immanuel Kaunt, boundaries are set in place in order to bring a person happiness when they are followed. Boundaries do not constrict a man’s self-identity rather they help to form it. It is not necessary to break boundaries in order to establish one’s own self-identity. In Crime and Punishment all major characters break either moral, legal or social boundaries throughout the book. The consequences they face show that breaking boundaries is not necessary in shaping one’s own identity. Legal boundaries are put in place to protect people from harm. When these boundaries are broken the consequences are harmful. In Crime and Punishment Raskolnikov breaks legal boundaries and reap the consequences. Raskolnikov believes that in order to shape his identity and be the extra ordinary man that he must save others from hurt by killing the land lady. “A hundred, a thousand, good actions and promising beginnings …show more content…

Sonya feels the need to break social boundaries in order to save her family. She thinks that by breaking social boundaries she will be her family’s savior. Her family needs money and Sonya knows that her mom is counting on her to help provide for them. “Then she takes comfort again. She pins all her faith on you; she says that you will help her…(pg.269).” Sonya breaks social boundaries by becoming a prostitute. Sonya breaks social boundaries when she becomes a prostitute. Sonya faces social consequences because of what she did for her family. By breaking this boundary Sonya did not form for herself her true identity instead she formed and identity that was not who she really was. By breaking a boundary, she was not able to form her true

Open Document