Social And Political Changes In The Progressive Era

806 Words2 Pages

The Progressive Era was truly an age that pushed America forward. This was a time that led to many reforms that brought about the America that we have today. During this period, there were four amendments that were passed, that brought about social and political changes; but beyond these, there were many ideas that were proposed and actions taken that empowered the average person. Theodore Roosevelt in particular, tried to improve the condition for the workers, and in his platform pushed for regulating working hours, improving wages, and compensating employees for overtime and injuries as part of his Square Deal. One particular instance where he implemented his program was when he intervened in a coal strike in 1902, and managed to secure …show more content…

During this time, women gained the right to vote in the 19th Amendment and Theodore Roosevelt fought to secure a minimum wage for women laborers. Women would become strong advocates for prohibition, creating the Women’s Christian Temperance Union to advocate laws against alcohol; during this time period, the 19th Amendment would be passed, banning the sale of alcoholic beverages. Women like Jane Addams would also become the pioneers of the settlement houses, helping immigrants and the poor find a place to live so they could work on improving their socioeconomic status. Aside from women’s suffrage, other changes to how politics were run were made too. During this time, the direct election of senators took place after the passage of the 17th Amendment and the direct primary also became a standard, allowing people to choose their party candidates. The secret ballot was also introduced to counter the pressures of the political machines, which sought to pressure voters at the polls. On a local level, the voters gained the ability to vote on initiatives for new laws, referendums to pass legislature, and the recall to remove public officials from …show more content…

To Robert Lafollette – How would you justify supporting Charles Van Hise, a man known for his racism, who said “He who thinks not of himself primarily, but of his race and of its future, is the new patriot,” as a candidate for the President of the University of Wisconsin. As a progressive man, shouldn’t you have challenged this man’s beliefs, who was also a proponent of racial eugenics, a notion which promotes a racial hierarchy?
2. To Woodrow Wilson – In a campaign speech, you say the United States has “no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” How do you then justify making the Federal Reserve, an organization that is run by a few men, in particular the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Chair of the Fed. Doesn’t the setup of this organization put incredible power over fiscal matters into the hands of a select few

Open Document