It is believed that the style used in the Passage “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edward’s is more effective than the style that is used in “The Minister’s Black Veil” by James Hawthorne. Both passages are well written however obviously one style is more effective than the other because of many reasons. Nevertheless, both styles are still effective. Firstly, the two styles are similar in some ways. Such as the word style that is used. The word style is more as, old dialect. It is used all throughout both passages. Another way the two styles can be compared is that the themes are picked up from a religious point of view. Not only that but the way they are written. Secondly, The two styles of writing both are contrasted in some ways. One way they are contrasted is obviously the way the passages are written, …show more content…
Also making the theme very suspense and eerie. Not only was it developed effectively but it was very contradicting. The theme for “The Minister’s Black Veil” was “Secret Sin”. It was developed by the black veil that the Minister has placed over his face. The black veil brings out that the Minister has a secret sin or that he is hiding something. In contrast, some may argue that Hawthorne's style was more effective because of the way the story was told and the incidents that happened in the story. Such as the black veil that the minister puts over his head, meaning that he has a secret sin or hiding something. Also it could be because the theme that is put off from the story which is “ Secret Sin”.
The most effective style used was in the passage “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Because of the way it was revealed which makes the reader take the theme personally. Also the theme is “ Without god you’re going to hell”, the reason it is that, is because the speech makes you feel as if without god you are going to hell due to the vague claims that are composed in the
In the passages “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne are both powerful texts. Edwards used more of an effective style to get his point across. He used a harsh and blunt tone to prove that the God is a powerful man and can strike at any time but does not. This is why his text is better than Hawthornes. In Edward’s text his theme was God is a very powerful man and can strike at any time but does not, and in Hawthorne's text his theme was don’t judge someone by the way they look.
The passages given from the Edwards' 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God'; and the opening sentence of the Declaration both include many points such as the tone, diction, and syntax. The points shown throughout each sentence aims for the intent of obtaining the attention of the audience. The way each sentence is arranged with its own syntax can very well appeal to listeners, depending on its structure and imagery.
And while describing the fiery wrath of the “Angry God,” Edwards states, “The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this congregation.” By focusing on this group of people, Edwards instills a sense of fear within the audience of “sinners.” 3) Edwards purpose in delivering this sermon was to inform “sinners” of the inevitable doom that He thus creates a sense of helplessness in his audience, and encourages them to submit to God and renew their faith in Christianity. His use of parallelism allows Edwards to exponentially build a sense of fear, and it is maintained throughout this sermon.
“The Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” By: Jonathan Edwards and “The Minister's Black Veil” By: Nathaniel Hawthorne are the two text we read about. In both of the passages the preachers are teaching a lesson about what will happen if you turn your back on God and the other shows them what will happen if you sin. “The Minister’s Black Veil” is more effective than “The Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” Because it’s a parable, which means you learn a lesson from it. The lesson you get from it is change will make people judge you. Hawthorne is experiencing what happens when you do things you
In the first few weeks of class we have discussed the thought and religion of the early people that first began the development of our counrty. As we have looked at the literature in class the works of these writers seem to be simlar in that each one talks about a higher being that these people all worshipped. However, that is where the comparisons would end. One of the writings that I found interesting was that of Jonathan Edwards. Born in 1703 in East Windsor, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards lived at a time when the Calvinistic Puritanism of the American colonies, particularly New England, was giving way to thoughts coming out of Europe. We had discussed in one of first classes the reason that so many of the laws and rights found here in the United States were the same as in Europe. The reason was for this is because that is where the people of early America came from. This is the reason for the large population of people believing in these thoughts and beliefs coming from Europe.
Jonathan Edwards is able to use powerful scare tactics to convince his congregation to undergo an emotional conversion. Edwards is a Christian preacher and theologian who stimulated the “Great Awakening.” Edwards is known for using powerful language; he creates images of absolute horror and images of delight. Edwards uses specific wording that lingers in his listeners mind. In Jonathan Edwards’s sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Edwards’s use of negative imagery, negative diction, and positive imagery and diction is able to convince the congregation to undergo an emotional conversion.
However, both of these text structures have similarities and nonconformity. One similarity is that both of these texts have the same written form. They both are talking about the same thing. Even Though, they have diversity characters. Those
In 1741, Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan preacher of that time, had one thing on his mind: to convert sinners, on the road to hell, to salvation. It just so happened to be, that his way of doing that was to preach the reality to them and scare them to the point of conversion. Sermons of this time were preached to persuade people to be converted and to me it seemed that Edwards just had a special way of doing it. Just as people are being influenced by rhetoric appeals today Edwards used the same method on his congregation. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Jonathan Edwards positively affected his readers using pathos, logos, and ethos, while trying to convince the unconverted members of his sermon to be born again.
Jonathan Edwards was a man who could petrify any eighteenth century Puritan. He was born in East Windsor, Connecticut and was raised in a household with strict religious beliefs. In 1727 he began his preaching career as an assistant to his grandfather, Solomon Stoddard, the pastor at the church at Northampton, Massachusetts. When his grandfather died two years later, Edwards became the pastor of the Church at Northampton and began preaching all over New England. He then emerged as one of the leaders of the Great Awakening with his determination to return to the orthodoxy of the Puritan faith. That is when he adopted his “fire and brimstone” emotional style of sermon. Although people often ran out of the church in hysterics, most stayed in the church captivated by his speeches. He had always purposely chose to address his congregation with a sermon, using all of the elements of an oratory. In Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Jonathan Edwards displays all elements of an oratory by appealing to emotions, including expressive and rhythmic language, addressing the needs and concerns of his audience, and inspiring others to take action.
Another way the author develops his consistent style is in the way he describes certain images. For example, there are a few different occasions where his way of describing what he sees around him are similar to eachother in a way that they all make reference to the fact that the day is going by and it will soon reach dusk. Like when he said 'the soft dew of morning which had glistened and twinkled on the blades of grass which grew in clumps by the side of road quietly disappeared.'; This indicates that the day is going on. At another point in the story the author makes reference to the shadows saying that they have grown longer, which would indicate the sun was setting. Also, the author never exactly comes right out and says the obvious. He uses his descriptive ways to give you an idea of what is going on or happening. For example, he never exactly says that the man he encounters on the road is an old man. He just gives certain physical characteristics that would associate with an old man. I feel his reasoning for this was to also indicate that this man was not just old but a man of wisdom, which very often is associated with old age.
Is God wrathful or forgiving? Is the human race prepared for the Judgement day? Jonathan Edwards addresses these questions in his sermon Sinners in the Hands of Angry Gods. Edwards explains that at any moment this wrathful God above could drop the whole entire human race into the fiery pits of hell. Repentance and change of heart is the only way that they can save themselves. This means that they have to realize that their hands hold their faith and Puritanism explains this to its followers in away that will save them. The human race has to realize the power of this angry God, and he has the power to just give up on the human race and drop them into hell for their selfishness. Edwards shows the theme of accepting
Jonathan Edwards, the author of “Sinners in the hands of an angry God” cunningly made his style more effective than Nathaniel Hawthorne's style in “The Ministers of the Black Veil.” Edwards used more of an aggressive style which worked better than Hawthorne’s sad and laid back style.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Rhetorical Analysis “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards uses imagery and symbolism to persuade the audience to become more devout Christians by channeling fear and emphasizing religious values. Jonathan Edwards was a Puritan minister who preached during the time of the Great Awakening in America. During this period of religious revival, Edwards wanted people to return to the devout ways of the early Puritans in America. The spirit of the revival led Edwards to believe that sinners would enter hell. Edwards’ sermon was primarily addressed to sinners for the purpose of alerting them about their sins and inspiring them to take action to become more devoted to God.
The Minister’s Black Veil, written by Nathaniel Hawthorne in 1836, is a parable about a minister, Mr. Hooper, who constantly wears a mysterious black veil over his face. The people in the town of Milford, are perplexed by the minister’s veil and cannot figure out why he insists on wearing it all of the time. The veil tends to create a dark atmosphere where ever the minister goes, and the minister cannot even stand to look at his own reflection. In Nathaniel Hawthorne 's literary work, The Minister 's Black Veil, the ambiance of the veil, separation from happiness that it creates, and the permanency of the black veil symbolize sin in people’s lives.
Naturally two books related to each other in this way have their similarities and differences in certain areas. Most of the similarities between both books fall in the areas of historical correctness and act...