Sinclair's Prufrock And Other Observations: A Criticism

666 Words2 Pages

May Sinclair’s “Prufrock and Other Observations: A Critisism” (Little review 4, no. 8, December 1918) is an article not on simply T. S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, but also how it is perceived. Sinclair attempts to argue against points that other reviewers (Mr. Waugh from the Quarterly, and an anonymous writer) negatively assert on Eliot and his work.
Mr. Waugh argues that Eliot is a “drunken Helot” and that his work strays too much from tradition - something Sinclair clearly disagrees with. She believes that “Mr. Elitos is not in any tradition at all” and that he “cuts all his corner and curves” which startles readers who are used to more classical and conventional work. This more ‘difficult’ poetry is in her eyes superior, …show more content…

Her statement that Eliot “knows what he is after, reality, stripped naked of all rhetoric, of all ornament, of all confusing and obscuring association” is an argument based around failure of logic. Eliot’s poems are filled with concealed or ambiguous references - The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock alone boasts allusion to the Bible ‘I am Lazerus, come from the dead’, Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night ‘I know the voices dying with a dying fall’ and most obviously the entirety of the epigraph being an excerpt from Dante’s Inferno. The common reader would no doubt face strife trying to work these references - there is scant truth in asserting that Eliot ‘strips away confusing and obscuring …show more content…

Although as discussed earlier, Eliot does not “cut his corners” as Sinclair states, he does not pad his work down - he imagery and surroundings that he depicts in his work are raw in nature and there is no doubt that it varies from the “good old manly traditions of the Quarterly” that Mr. Waugh is accustomed to. When analysing his work (The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock in particular), this becomes obvious as the beautiful rhythm of “Let us go then, you and I, when the evening is spread out against the sky” is contrasted with the stark suddenness of “Like a patient etherised upon a table”. Although this is only one example, the emotion that Eliot is trying to illustrate is evident.

Sinclair’s understanding of J. Alfred Prufrock is that Prufrock is “aware of his futility”. The text itself however, points towards the idea that Prufrock lies on an immaculately woven edge between a will to act and his frightened introspection. Prufrock himself believes that “there will be time” - he is does not think that he has no chance, only that “They will say: “How his hair is growing thin!” or “But how his arms and legs are thin!”. This facet of his character is not futility, but self consciousness and doubt for he had been thinking only on the side of his

Open Document