Simkin In Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales

729 Words2 Pages

The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, is a book of tales that are filled with moral and life lessons. In “The Reeve’s Tale”, the miller, Simkin, often cheats many of his customers and has a pugnacious nature. When the maniciple becomes ill, two of his students, Alan and John, decide to help out by traveling to the miller. Because of his reputation, Alan and John ask the miller if they could watch him grain the corn so that they can prevent Simkin from cheating them. Skimkin realizes their plan and devises a new one to counteract theirs so he can steal the flour from them. He agrees to their condition but then releases their horses, foiling their plans and allowing the miller to cheat them. When the duo finally get their horses …show more content…

Alan and John sneak into Simkin’s wife and daughter’s room and becomes “at one” with them (Chaucer 4197). The justice brought upon the miller is to degrade the women who are closest to Simkin, essentially defiling what Simkin loves most, his property. When the miller finds out, he threatens them that they “shalt be dead” for what they have done (Chaucer 4270). Simkin does not initially realize that this is his punishment for continually cheating others and resorts to anger and violence instead or repentance. We are shown more of his destructive nature that becomes his demise. Additionally, for a moment we can see that perhaps Simkin has a shred of humanity until Chaucer mentions that the women “come of such lineage” (Chaucer 4273). By doing so, Chaucer destroys any kind of sympathy for Simkin and makes him the sole example of what becomes of deceit and lies. All in all, Chaucer conveys human corruption through Simkin and makes him the example of justice. Although all his tales describe similar morals, it is evident to say that those who lie and deceive will always be punished. In more ways than one, we find ourselves often disagreeing with this sentiment and harbor anger towards those who cheat because they always seem to be the most successful. Chaucer empathizes with that and shows the audience that although the miller continually cheats, he eventually gets punished by Alan and John thus showing that patience is a key role within

Open Document