Similarities Between Wheatley And Mary Rowlandson

755 Words2 Pages

The discovery of the New World by Christopher Columbus led to the inevitable captivity of the indigenous people as well as of people who were considered ‘different’. A new literary genre had grown from the brutal clash between the native Indian settlers and the British colonists during King Philip’s War. Some of these Native Indian Settlers or Colonialists were undeniably captured and kept prisoner by the British and out of this involvement came autobiographical literature of these experiences. This became a new literary genre called captivity narratives which developed a vast audience universally. Both Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs Mary Rowlandson and Phillis Wheatley’s On Being Brought from Africa to …show more content…

Rowlandson was able to rely on her Puritan religion as a way to survive being taken into captivity. Rowlandson was separated from her husband, a minister, and her children and as a result during her captivity she became exceptionally reliant on Bible she had acquired from an Indian keeping her captive. In similar ways both Rowlandson and Wheatley use religion as a source of hope. Rowlandson uses the Bible as a beacon of optimism “Lord, what shall we do?” (page 267) and her faith is soon restored in God as she is reunited with her children and her husband eleven weeks after her being taken captive. Her writing is very simplistic and uncomplicated like most Puritan writers. She does not reference any other book in her captivity narrative except the Bible which displays the extreme beliefs she had about her covenant with …show more content…

The relationship was composed by God and only the chosen people could every reach this covenant bond that was shared. Rowlandson states “while under the enemy’s hand, and returning us to safety again” (page 267) suggesting that she acclaims the destruction of Lancaster not to the Indians who attacked her town but to God himself. She believed that the Indians capturing many of the Puritans was as a result of the Puritans not being able to withhold this bond with God; John Cotton has also suggested this earlier with “degenerate, to take loose courses, God will surely plucke you up” Rowlandson therefore concluded that “our perverse and evil carriages in the sight of the Lord have so offended Him that, instead of turning his hand against the Indians, the Lord feeds and nourishes them.” She believed God was the creator of the all too convenient attack and it was placed as a test to the Puritan community as she was one of twenty-four Puritans to be taken. God is made out to be almost manipulative in her narrative and the relationship that he controlled between the Indians and the Puritans; favouring the Indians because of the colonists falling into sinful

Open Document