Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The hound of the baskervilles short summary of 200 words
Arthur conan doyle writing style
The hound of the baskervilles short summary of 200 words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Old school Vs New school
A novel based off of a 19th century mass murderer and a movie with a 21st century twist. The book written in 1901 was about the mass murderer Jack the Ripper. The movie was a 21st century remake of the novel. The novel The Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie The Hound of the Baskervilles directed by David Attwood are comparable in three aspects. The characters in the movie and the book, the scenes, and the plot structure have many similarities and differences.
First, the characters in the book are very different then in the movie. Cartwright, a main character in the novel was not mentioned in the movie. Cartwright helped Holmes, but is spotted, which was a very important part of the discovery of Holmes on the moor (Doyle, 173). In the movie, Dr. Watson never spotted Holmes on the moor, but did see Cartwright on a hill on the moor, which prompted him to search for Holmes. Another character that was in the book but was not present in the movie was the character, Frankland. He was also important in the discovery of Sherlock Holmes on the moor.
…show more content…
In the movie, the main characters are, for the most part, the same, with the same mystery and the same climax, but the way the plot panned out is very different. In the resolution of the movie, the killer, Mr. Stapleton died from drowning in the Grimpen Mire on the moor (228-229), but the movie panned out very differently. In the movie, Stapleton and Sherlock get into a fight then Sherlock falls in the muck. As Stapleton is about to shoot Sherlock, Watson saves the day. Watson shot Stapleton in the movie which was the resolution, but this did not happen in the novel. The ending of the novel takes up multiple chapters, but the movie has only a few minutes. The directors, because of this, came to the idea that the movie should end quicker but in a more action packed
With both the movie and the book there were similarities and differences involving the names of the characters. Justice Wargrave was known as Author Cannon in the movie. Also, Vera Claythorne was Ann Clyde. Another difference is Philip Lombard was Charles Morman in the movie. However, there were some similar names, Mr. Blores’ name continued to stay the same as well as Dr. Armstrong.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
From the start, the movie is adapted from the novel and therefore it could not cover everything, some actions or acts in the novel are too dense such that it is not of any importance to angle them in the movie. It is very realistic to everyone that the movie cannot cover every single paragraph in the novel even the memorable ones. Some materials are left out in the film, and others were changed.
There are many similarities presented to the audience between the movie and the novel. One
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
There are three major differences between the novel and the film of Fahrenheit 451. First, the film is set in a contemporary near-future, without many of the dramatic science-fiction elements seen in the novel; the Mechanical Hound and the wall-sized television screens are absent, as are the nihilistic children and the jet-powered cars. Second, the war, which is a major plot point in the novel, is barely mentioned; while in the book it was a source of concern and provides the climax, in the film, it only appears in a throwaway line in the background.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
For starters, the ending of the movie was very different from the book. Instead of Vera hanging herself and everyone ends up being dead like in the book, the director of the movie makes a plot twist to make the movie end with two survivors. Philip Lombard and Vera Claythorne are the two survivors who find out who the killer is. They are the only ones alive to escape. Another small change that occured was when some of the victims died for example, Emily Brent. Instead of expecting that everyone dies and there being no resolution, the director decided to make that change so that there could be hope for the
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film.
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.
Gullivers Travels Comparison Between Book and Movie It is common in today's media-driven society to reach into the past for inspiration and ideas. A trend has developed where original works are transformed into other mediums. For example: books are turned into movies and/or plays, movies are turned into weekly sitcoms, and cartoons will spawn empires (Disney). These things happen so often that an audience rarely stops to question the level of authenticity that remains after these conversions. Perhaps it is only when a project is not well received that people begin to think of the difficulties involved with changing a work's genre.