As the man flees he leaves his society behind him while his society flees him going into a state of disarray. This is a statement that could be used to describe Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Jonas’s flight from his community or it could be used to describe Guy Montag the protagonist from Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and his flight from his city. This is one of the many similarities the two books have. While the similarities are plenty the differences are what really stand out, the differences are what make the books them and not the other. "The Giver" and "Fahrenheit" are very different societies but under that first layer they are very similar. For example the Education in both societies. This facet of their society is the same in the way
...e war, Montag and his new friends return to the community to rescue survivors and rebuild a new, improved civilization. The conflict between the power of the individual and the power structures of both communities in The Giver and Fahrenheit 451 result in endings that are undeniably hopeful.
When one examines the similarities between Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, and The Giver by Lois Lowry, they may be baffled. They may think that Lowry just did a run off of Huxley's highly successful masterpiece. The similarities are extraordinary, but so are their differences. Many aspects of these novels are almost identical while others are completely foreign to each other. Both of these novels feature structured societies, but the societies are not the same. In Brave New World, there are no families or definite partners, but neither society believes in love or true family. The Giver has no specific caste system, but the members of their community do not have control of their own future; that is left to the elders of the community. Lastly are Jonas and John. They are basically the main characters and both endure severe inner troubles, but are they similar enough to make the novels similar?
Fahrenheit 451 and A Brave New World: How does the setting affect both the novels?
The way that family members relate in these countries conflict with each other. The differences start developing in the beginning of their lives. American children are taught by their parents how to manage and make their own money. They are taught to value accomplishments and work at an early age. They also have duties at home such as being responsible for helping with house tasks.
A common feature in the dystopian genre is a unique protagonist, who holds views which are not necessarily in concordance with society’s regime. Both Fahrenheit 451 and The Handmaid’s Tale display protagonists’ trapped in a situation undesirable to them, yet are powerless to do anything about it. This is due to the oppression which is essential in any dystopian society. However, unlike most people in these societies, Guy Montag and Offred actually realise they live as part of an unjust regime. The two characters are nonconformists to the extent that they both dare to be different in the totalitarian regime that surrounds them, as commented by Devon Ryan, “the protagonist does not always have outstanding powers or talents, ” yet they have to
“Money won’t create success, the freedom to make it will.” (Nelson Mandela) In the movie Elysium, directed by Neil Blomkamp, and Fahrenheit 451, written by Rad Bradbury, each protagonist’s objective is to rebel against their oppressive government. In Elysium, Max grows up as a child with the inspiration of leaving his shattered earth and making it to the higher world, known as “Elysium” with his friend Frey. This makes it easier for max to reach his goal and obtain success because he grew up with the inspiration. Unlike Fahrenheit 451, where the Protagonist Guy Montag starts out by agreeing with the Utopian society he’s in, burning books and following the government’s orders. To acquire success, a
These societies were happy and merry. Everyone had everything they needed to be happy. They had lots of fun and their lives were perfect. In Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, and “Masque of the Red Death”, written by Edgar Allan Poe, both of these societies show how they are full of pleasure-seeking. The similarities in theme of pleasure-seeking as a priority are extreme and they are worthy of full discussion. It is good to make yourself happy, but it can backfire on you. The people in these stories only cared about making themselves happy but they ended up dying. These points show up in both Fahrenheit 451 and “Masque of the Red Death”.
In the Veldt and Fahrenheit 451 there were many eye opening events and stories throughout the books. The Veldt described a lot of future technology and the effect it had or would have on people in the future, as does Fahrenheit 451. Both of the books had many examples of the negative aspect of technology. It ended up ruining relationships among families and friends even though it seemed helpful in the beginning.
“Revealing the truth is like lighting a match. It can bring light or it can set your world on fire” (Sydney Rogers). In other words revealing the truth hurts and it can either solve things or it can make them much worse. This quote relates to Fahrenheit 451 because Montag was hiding a huge book stash, and once he revealed it to his wife, Mildred everything went downhill. Our relationships are complete opposites. There are many differences between Fahrenheit 451 and our society, they just have a different way of seeing life.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
A dystopian society can be defined as “a society characterized by human misery”. 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury both demonstrate dystopian societies. However, that does not mean they do not their differences. In each society the government has different ways of controlling and limiting its citizens for doing only what they want them to do. In 1984, violators are brainwashed into loving and following Big Brother as if they never knew the truth and return back to their everyday lives. Fahrenheit 451 also punishes violators in a way that makes them regret and scared to ever do it again instead of making them forget.
These civilizations present many resemblances that were once part of the foundations of their society. Although both of these civilizations were at one point enemies of one another, they had similar correlations that shaped and formed their cultures and societies. The main difference between these two civilizations is religion. Without its differences, each civilization had governed its people in manners that it could not be differentiated among each other. Overall, these civilizations presented different methods of leading a civilization and still had similarities among one another.
Modern-Day America is far from a utopia, but still not to be considerd a dystopia.America cannot be compatable to the futuristic society of The Giver by Lois Lowry. They both have bad qualities, such as America has a problem with racism, while in The Giver the goverment eliminates choices. In additionto that both societies have a problems with birth controll. Modern-Day America and The Giver has their ups and downs.
In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, alienation is a prominent theme throughout the novel. The alienation and isolation of the protagonist Guy Montag reveals the dystopian society’s false assumptions of knowledge and blasphemous moral values. The ever present sense of separation associated with Montag occurs both within himself, with his wife, and with society altogether.
On the other hand, China and America are two societies with different history, different ways of thinking, different lifestyles, and different education systems. Here are some of my observations: