More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of martin luther king jr
The autobiography of malcolm x summary essays
Brief biography of malcolm x
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Two of the most Influential Civil Rights Movement leaders were known as Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Both of these leaders had different perspectives, actions and arguments. Being a minority in America is the toughest battle anyone could face but having leaders that speak up for those who can’t, create the biggest impact. The different approaches in society is what made Martin Luther King and Malcolm X impacts on their movements popular and strong that it is still discussed about today but seldom understood. Generally, they both fought for the same reason, which is gaining equality and justice in America as a minority. In this essay I will further break down and compare the importance of each one their perspectives, including Peace …show more content…
Both were incredible speakers. They spoke their minds and souls out for the millions of the oppressed African Americans. Ending segregation and receiving the justice that is long overdue. The leadership skills, Malcolm X brought to the community was rejuvenated energy that gave young black men and women the hope to rise above the white man and stand up for themselves, not wait for someone else to do it for them. As I was watching him speak, he used sarcasm and humor to attract the audience, which was brilliant. Malcolm X aimed for the younger community because they were the future and they had the ability to begin making a change. He also wanted this sort of revenge for the suffering African Americans suffered and died from. Meanwhile, Martin Luther King was a preacher, which helped his skills as a civil rights activist. He became an idol, he was named Time’s “Man of the year” in 1963 while following, he won a Nobel Peace prize in 1964. Also, he had support from all ordinary folks in the nation. His aim was the African American Community as a whole. Martin Luther King was devoted, but he spoke for the fairness of the world. He believed that non violence was not only essential for solving conflicts between nations, but also resolving differences between nations. Nonviolence was not only the most effective strategy of social change, but it was the “heart of …show more content…
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both knew that the white man is the enemy, the slave owner, the oppressor. Both, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, had similar, but different experiences with the white man. The target of the privileged white Americans has been always the African Americans in America to be looked down upon and tormented. Although Malcolm X refused to bring religion in order to fight for what he believed in, him believing the Islam religion is what made Malcolm X more intolerable from the Caucasians. His belief in the Islam religion is a reason why he chose to become an activist. His father was threatened by the Ku Klux Klan, and that is what truly driven him to stand up and take action for civil rights. Martin Luther King shared an experience “...in Birmingham, Alabama when we were in that majestic struggle, there we would move out of the 16th Street Baptist Church day after day… Bull Connor would tell them to send the dogs forth and they did come; but we just went before the dogs singing, "Ain't gonna let nobody turn me round.”” this story shares the faith, the belief and the strength he had about chasing that freedom, even if it was in the back of a paddy wagon singing their hearts out not knowing the outcome. It deeply represents the character of who Martin Luther King was a citizen and human being.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both African American civil rights leaders wanting to bring freedom to black people during the 1960s. Even though both leaders wanted to liberate black people; their philosophies were drastically different. Malcolm X was wanted racial separation, while Martin Luther King wanted to both races to coexist. Religion is also a major part of this situation because most African Americans including MLK in America were Christian while Malcolm X’s goal was to turn all people who follow his path to convert into Muslims. Martin Luther King’s philosophy would’ve made more sense to 1960s America because most people who wanted freedom in society would rather consider coexisting than more racial
Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Malcolm X rejected the idea that the main goal of the civil rights movement should be based on an aspiration to gain rights “equal” to those of white men and to assimilate into white culture. They instead emphasized a need to empower Black Americans.1 Their ideas were considered radical at a time when Martin Luther King Jr. preached the potential of white and black americans to overcome “the race issue” together and in a gradual manner. Malcolm X’s attempt to achieve his goals through revolutionary top-down methods and Fannie Lou Hamer’s focus on the need for grassroots movements contributed to the Civil Rights movement significantly by encouraging and assisting Black Americans.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most prominent leaders and orators at the heart of the Civil Rights Movement. Although both leaders possessed the same objectives, their outlooks and perspectives differed immensely.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most well known African American Leaders in the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. was a baptist minister, a social activist, and later became a leader in the Civil Rights Movement, while Malcolm X was an American Muslim minister and also a human rights activist. They used different tactics for violence to achieve their goals, and they also had different beliefs for the roles of whites in the Civil RIghts Movement.
Have you ever heard that we were united as one nation? Whites and blacks together? Well the truth is we're not amalgamated. The problem with racial segregation is still unsolved to this day. Why, you may ask, some say it's because people will never get along with different races but the truth is that back during the civil rights movement ,that held two civil rights leader, we listened to MLK instead of Malcolm X. MLK and Malcolm X were civil rights leaders who had different philosophies and different followers. The type of followers depends on the type of philosophy. MLK’s philosophy was to take the nonviolent peaceful route which is the philosophy most people took instead of Malcolm X whose philosophy was to take action and maybe ,if necessary, use violence. I would be one of those followers of malcolm x and you should be to because even though he isn't here his philosophy is still to this day forever in motion and can be used if you hear me out. Malcolm x's philosophy is prefered more because of three reasons. First off he's a realist who knew the cost for freedom, secondly he thought the way to help people is to free all not one person, and the last reason is he was a man of action who got things done instead of dream and talk like MLK. Here's my elaboration if you're unsure.
African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
Until the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., his life’s work was dedicated to the nonviolent actions of blacks to gain the freedoms they were promised in the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 by Abraham Lincoln. He believed that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King, 1963). These injustices had become so burdensome to blacks that they were “plunged into an abyss of despair” (King, 1963). The nonviolent actions of the sit-ins, boycotts, and marches were so the “individual could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths…to help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism” and ultimately lead to “inevitably opening the door to negotiation” (King, 1963). Not only was King’s approach effective with the older black generation, it was also successful with white people. They did not feel threatened when approached by King. White people gained a sense of empathy towards the plight of black freedom as King’s promise of nonviolence did not threaten their livelihood. Malcolm X viewed the world similarly to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., however; his beliefs to changing the status quo were slightly different from his political counterpart. Malcolm X realized that “anger could blind human vision” (X, 1965). In realizing this, X knew that in order to achieve racial freedom blacks had to “forget hypocritical politics and propaganda” (X, 1965). While Malcolm X was more so an advocate for violent forces against white people than King, X merely used force when it became necessary for defense. According to X, “I don’t go for non-violence if it also means a delayed solution. I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to American black man’s problem” (X, 1965). However, this le...
...artin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X approach the same problem differently. They both use pathos, a central metaphor, and give a warning. However, Martin Luther King Jr. uses pathos to create a welcoming and patriotic feeling whereas Malcolm X uses fear. Martin Luther King Jr. uses a check, used on a daily basis, as the object of his central metaphor; Malcolm X uses a powder keg, a very damaging and dangerous object, as the object of his central metaphor. Lastly, Martin Luther King Jr. warns his audience that the people of color will revolt passively. On the other hand, Malcolm X warns his audience that the people of color will revolt violently with bloodshed. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both achieve their goal. After reading both speeches, Malcolm X seems, in my opinion, to have made a greater impact on the white community because fear is stronger than joy.
The 20th century was a definitive time period for the Black civil rights movement. An era where the status quo was blatant hatred and oppression of African Americans, a time when a black son would watch his father suffer the indignity of being called a “boy” by a young white kid and say nothing in reply but “yes sir”. Where a Black person can be whipped or lynched for anything as little as not getting off the sidewalk when approaching a white person, for looking into their eyes, or worse, “for committing the unpardonable crime of attempting to vote.” In the midst of the racial crises and fight for social equality were Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. who despite their difference in philosophies were “icons of social justice movement both in the United States and around the world” .
Malcolm X and James Baldwin were two men that played a large role in defining a people and a cause during the 1950s and 1960s. Both of these men were dynamic African-Americans who lived primarily to help their people, who were terribly persecuted in the United States for many years. The interesting thing about these two men is that they strove towards the same goal—to unify African-Americans and give them strength and confidence—but they accomplished this goal in very different ways. Malcolm X, a leader in the Nation of Islam movement, believed that African-Americans needed to acquire strength and confidence so that they could separate from the White man and live together in peace, harmony, and production. On the other hand, James Baldwin, renowned writer, believed it necessary for African-Americans to have strength and confidence so that they might coexist on the same level as whites and accomplish what whites were accomplishing. The methodology and teachings of James Baldwin and Malcolm X differed greatly, but their general belief, that African-Americans were just as good as everybody else prevailed over all else, and made these men two of the very important faces of a generation.
Two men, born nearly a hundred years apart, each seeking revolutionary changes in the United States in ways suited to their society and circumstances. Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X were monumental and influential figures in American history. In the books Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass and The Autobiography of Malcolm X, both Douglass and Malcolm used their extraordinary oratorical skills and charisma to object to the systematic oppression and subjugation that was imposed on African-Americans. The philosophy of Douglass and Malcolm is characterized by their views on education, Christianity, and slavery.
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two leaders that African Americans admired and appreciated, because they both risk their lives for equality. Although they had different approaches; Malcolm X and King both had an impact on African Americans during the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. shared his knowledge about segregation with African Americans. King also warned African Americans that it might take time for a change to cone. In other words, he told African Americans that segregation laws would not be changed in one day. However, Malcolm X wanted African Americans to stand up for themselves and fight for their rights. He wanted African Americans to fight for their equally and he was willing to help them if necessary. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X wisdom helped African Americans.
Whenever people discuss race relations today and the effect of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, they remember the work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He was and continues to be one of the most i...
Based on some of the things Malcolm has done, Martin Luther King Jr. definitely had a different way of approaching issues. With both of their totally different ways of getting their point across, discussion could be made on who was more effective in the civil rights movement as a whole. If Malcolm X wasn't around and fighting for civil rights around the same time as MLK was doing it here he probably would of had much of a chance and would have just been killed, he in a way motivated the whole world into fighting for civil rights in their country, without his “black power” philosophy. He was easily in the top five people that got the civil rights movement to follow its course and end up getting equality for black and white. Malcolm X was orphaned early in life.