“...remember one thing only: that it’s you-nobody else-who determines your destiny and decides your fate. Nobody else can be alive for you; nor can you be alive for anybody else” (E.E. Cummings). In both Orwell’s 1984 and Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Winston and Macbeth choose to make bad decisions that result in their deaths. Winston has the freewill to choose to rebel against the Party or not to rebel against them, but chooses himself to be rebellious. Likewise, it is Macbeth’s decision to murder the King, despite the fact he has the option to not commit the action. Even though Julia, Winston’s lover, pressures him to engage in sexual intercourse with her, a rebellious act under the Party’s command, it is ultimately Winston’s choice to disobey …show more content…
He chooses to engage in rebellious activities, which lead to his demise. If Winston were to remain obedient to the Party’s rules, he would have most likely lived out the rest of his life. It is Winston’s choice to betray the Party by disobeying their rules, which he does by writing in his diary and engaging in sexual intercourse with Julia. Winston is also fully aware that what he is doing is wrong, yet “...what he wanted, more even than to be loved, was to break down that wall of virtue, even if it were only once in his whole life. The sexual act, successfully performed, was rebellion. Desire was thoughtcrime” (Orwell 71). Winston has the option to obey the Party, yet he makes the alternative decision to rebel. He makes these poor decisions at his own discretion, and they ultimately lead to his downfall. Violating the Party’s rules results in a possible punishment of death, which Winston is well aware of. Therefore, his poor choices lead to his murder. Winston had the option to obey the Party or disobey the Party and he chose to disobey them. As well, Winston is responsible for choosing to be converted by O’Brien, a member of the Party, into believing what the Party believes. Sure, Winston would be tortured if he chooses not to succumb to the Party’s beliefs, but yet he still has the freewill to choose to be tortured. No matter how painful the torture was, Winston still has
Winston commits “thoughtcrime” leading to his arrest and questioning at the Ministry of Love, the communities jail center working with matters pertaining to war. His comrade O’Brien begins torturing him in an underground room and calls it the “learning stage”. He teaches Winston the truth about the Party and their slogan; eventually he explains that “Freedom is Slavery” is easily reversed as “Slavery is freedom. Alone- free- the human being is always defeated… if he can make complete, utter submission… [and] merge himself in the Party… then he is all-powerful and immortal” (264). The Party uses this statement to illustrate that when one acknowledges the collective will, they become free from danger and desire. Those who are surrendered to INGSOC, including O’Brien, assume that when an individual has freedom they become subjugated to their senses and emotions. Moreover, Winston continues to be starved and tortured until he appears to be nothing but skin and bones when his opinions transition to align with the governments. He now accepts everything that O’Brien has expressed to him including that he is crazy and two plus two equals five. While he thinks about what he has been taught he thinks about “How easy it all was! Only surrender, and everything else followed… he hardly knew why he had ever rebelled” (278). In a sense, Winston is now free, only in a
...ptions to choose. Winston world is controlled by the party. By limiting his options to what he sees and what he does not see, the party is successful in controlling Winston’s free will in a direction that favors their ideals. Free will does not disappear in the ignorant nor does it disappear in the closed minded, therefore one cannot say that Winston has not lost free will simply because information is controlled and he suppresses idea contrary to the party. It would not be erroneous to say that if the circumstances were different, if Winston lived in a democratic society where the majority truly rules instead of a party and information truly flows freely, Winston would act different because the environment would be different; there is more information and thus more paths for his free will to take. But in the world of George Orwell’s distopia this is not the case.
One reason for Winston's rebellion, and eventual downfall, is his knowledge that the party will ultimately capture and punish him. With constant surveillance of Party members, any sign of disloyalty could lead to an arrest; even a tiny facial twitch. As soon as he writes Down with BB' in his diary, Winston is positive that the Thought police will quickly capture him for committing thought crime. With this wisdom, he allows himself to take unnecessary risks, such as trusting O'Brien and renting the room in Mr. charington's shop to host his secret relationship with Julia. Because he has no doubt that he will be caught no matter what he does, he continues to rebel, and brings his own struggle to an end.
Many would say the root of human conflict is greed, but many others would argue that the root is power. The pieces of literature that our English class have seen this in the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare and also in the novel 1984 by George Orwell. The main character Hamlet is a young princes that seeks revenge against his uncle for the death of his father. We see him various times throughout the play getting himself in situations that involve many conflicts. One of the very famous arguments in the play is with his mother where he confront her to betray her current husband for what he had done to Hamlet Senior. ““My words fly up, my thoughts remain below: Words without thoughts never to heaven go.”( Shakespeare). This quote provides the
Throughout the book he tries to overcome the government, but in his heart, he knows he has no hope of thriving because “…was already dead” for committing ThoughtCrime and involving himself in acts worthy of death (Orwell 36). All of his character traits combined lead him to his ultimate death. His attraction to beauty makes him keep hold of objects and things considered suspicious, his rebelliousness causes him break nearly all of society’s rules, and his curiosity steers him toward people and places that eventually causes the Winston torture he endures in Ministry of Love. Winston could have had some false hope of a better world where he could get away from all of the harsh rules and regulations of the Party, but in reality, his personality traits dragged him through a life already pre-written and stamped with an early
O’Brien tortures Winston due to his acts of thoughtcrime, Winston is told that the Party will be satisfied with nothing less than Winston completely giving in. O’Brien explains, “We are not content with negative obedience, nor even with the most abject submission. When finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will. We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us; so long as he resists us we never destroy him” (210). Winston is tortured for the goal of eradicating the cause of Winston’s fight, to consider himself happy and free. O’Brien wants to destroy any possibility of Winston becoming a martyr for his cause. The use of the telescreens, microphones, and all other sources of the government spying on its people ensures a lack of freedom: “Asleep or awake, working or eating, indoors or out of doors, in the bath or in bed- no escape. Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull” (26). The members of this society are monitored at all times for the sole purpose of government control, with constant monitoring they are able to discover the most they can about individuals and later use it against them to gain an upper hand in controlling any possible uprising. Fear is used as another tactic to gain control. Winston is aware of the fact that “More
The raw human nature is to not be controlled; no man or woman likes to be bossed around, especially when the person making all the decisions is treating those under them unfairly. Winston sees how the Party is doing the citizens of Oceania wrong and is the only citizen who has the gumption to try and do anything about it making him the odd man out (Goodman 5). History has proven that you can only hold people back for so long before they erupt with fury. He fights back against their constant knowing of every detail of every person’s life and against the Party’s iron grip over Oceania (“1984” 245). Another thing that can only be quenched for a short period of time is the desire for companionship amongst people. No matter how hard a person tries to prevent a man and a woman from being in love they are unable to stop it from happening. Actually trying to prevent companionship between two lovers only feeds the fire. Even when danger comes around, a man will be willing to do anything to have companionship with a woman. Winston knows that there is a high chance of him and Julia being arrested and even possibly killed, he still goes through with trying to continuously be in her presence (“1984” 238). With all the things and actions Winston does throughout the novel, it is very plain to see that he symbolizes rebellion and human desire in a crystal clear fashion. No matter
Both are taken into custody and tortured and beaten so that they can be rebuilt to obey the Party and to sell out each other. Winston takes many days of torture and pain before he is put into room 101 where he is encountered with his worst fear,which is rats. Winston the breaks down and yells, “Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia! Not me! I don’t care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to the bones. Not me! Julia! Not me” (Orwell 286). The only thing that kept Winston going was the fact that he hadn’t yet betrayed Julia, and he felt determined to never betray her. With Julia, O’Brien told Winston that she gave him away almost instantly. She was all about saving herself,and did not care about what could happen to Winston now that they were caught and their relationship would not continue.
A controversial question debated by many is, “Can human beings really have the freedom to do as we wish? Or do people influence our so called ‘free will’, to the extant where we don’t have a choice? ” This question is raised in Macbeth, written by William Shakespeare in 1606, a play that deals with key themes such as good versus evil and power. I will be talking about how the witches aren’t the most powerful characters in the play, and aren’t the catalyst to all of Macbeth’s crimes by using the witches, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth himself. It took a combination of the witches, Lady Macbeth and himself for Macbeth to commit these crimes.
Winston Smith is a member of an unchanging machine and as a result is subject to the atrocities that this society entails. Now, Winston throughout the course of the novel chose to defy the party of Ingsoc and because of trying to stand up to the atrocities, he was devoured promptly by the beast of the Party who has the Big Brother as its figurehead. In the face of this totalitarian rule, it is better to dissent in silence and ignore the atrocities that happen around you. Winston Smith decided to forego the path most traveled by and as a result all the difference to his life. Winston eventually suffered a metaphorical or literal death when that bullet entered in his brain and Winston won victory over himself. While the tangibility of that bullet creates some debate, there can be no debate to the fact that had Winston had not expressed his rebellious thoughts he would have led a natural, albeit, unfulfilling life. I believe that Winston Smith would have been ultimately better off dissenting in silent and keeping his treasonous thoughts to himself in order to avoid the fate of those who oppose Big
“So I’ll ask you a question, if your life were the prize, would you kill the innocent? Would you sacrifice your humanity? Would you do the unthinkable, for your own gain? We all make choices, but in the end, our choices make us”, that’s what Andrew Ryan’s believed. In the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare there is betrayal, murder and lust for power. Where a noble, honorable man losses his morality. Where a woman’s greed drives her to make rash decision eventually driving her insane. Guilt in some cases can be worse than death.
Winston works for 1 of the 4 government agency’s, The Ministry of Truth. In his job he re-writes old news articles so they show that The Party has always been and will be in control. By re-writing everything in print, The Party effectively changes history. The only proof of actual history is in the minds of the people who were there. Winston realizes that there is something wrong with this, yet he doesn’t know what. The re-writing of history is all he has ever known. It is most likely Winston’s job that leads him to rebel against The Party.
In two separate, yet equally important worlds the same dangers and mishaps of everyday life, cause imminent harm to not only the characters but their entire situations and environments. What affects the characters, eventually unrolls into a domino effect, affecting everything around them. In both Orwell’s 1984 and Shakespeare's Othello, the characters go through dramatic events that shift the ending of the show or novel. In Orwell’s 1984, a man named Winston is constantly fighting against his “doublethink” thoughts and against the ideals forced onto him by the absolutist government plaguing his nation of Oceania. While in Shakespeare's Othello, the main character also is constantly rethinking over his thoughts
Through months of torture and debilitating pressure, he was stripped of his individualism and was taught to love big brother (McLaughlin). The pressures of society mixed with the strenuous hours of daily torture took a toll on his weakened brain. This was most evident when O’Brien asked him one last time if he loved Big Brother, and he answered yes. He did not say yes in order to end the torture, rather he said yes because his brain was rendered incapable of independent thought. Orwell does this to show his readers that self expression and independent thought are what ultimately make us human. Without those two things, we are left to live in an impressionistic society, one that urges us to like and believe in certain things- similar to that of Oceania. O’Brien torturing Winston was more than just the climax of the book; it was the solution to Orwell’s underlying question: Can the traits that make us human prevail in the face of turmoil and despair? "You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every moment scrutinized” (Orwell 3).The fact that this statement made in the beginning holds true by the end of the novel answers the question that no; humanity would not
he is a man with a tragic flaw. Winston's fatalism, selfishness and isolation ultimately lead him to his