Similarities Between 12 Angry Men And To Kill A Mockingbird

1166 Words3 Pages

Every second of everyday people talk. When people talk they spread their owns beliefs and most of the time they don't usually match up. People interact with others whom they disagree with often, reacting in different ways that are shown in literature. More specifically, To Kill A Mockingbird a novel by Harper Lee, Twelve Angry Men a play written by Reginald Rose, and Ronald J. Allen’s “American Flag Stands For Tolerance” which is his response to the Supreme Court's decision to consider flag burning an act of freedom of expression. All of these pieces of literature show how people act when faced with others whom they disagree with. Most people either accept or reject others with whom they disagree, whereas some are undecided. The decisions …show more content…

Francis speaks of Atticus in a condescending way to Scout. He insults Atticus because he heard Aunt Alexandra disagrees and does not support Atticus’s trail case. He then builds off what he hears and forms his own opinion, taunting Scout, which results in her objecting his claim. He shows his opinion to Scout when he says, “ ‘He’s nothin’ but a nigger-lover,” Scout opposes saying, ‘He is not!’ ” (Lee 110). Francis dislikes Atticus because of what he heard from Aunt Alexandra. He is unwilling to open his mind and take different ideas in. He does not think his opinion could be wrong, which is why he rejects Scout when she disagrees with him. Others who are close minded are rejecting of others’ input with whom they disagree with since they do not believe they can be wrong. An additional source is Twelve Angry Men. When the evidence for the trail was being sifted through by the jurors, a lot of jurors put in new ideas that proved the defendant to be not guilty. Jurior #3 did not take into consideration of any of the other jurors’ input and rejected them all. His rejection is shown when he states, “I’m ready to walk into court right now and declare a hung jury” (Rose 246). Juror #3 was so set on his own opinion that he rejected all of the other jurors’ input, ready to end it all by proclaiming a hung jury. He is close minded and believes that it is impossible for his judgement to be wrong, which is why he rejects any ideas that contradict his stance on the defendant being guilty. Stubborn people who think their reasoning is flawless, reject everyone else who disagrees with them. Narrow minded people are rejecting of those whom they disagree with since they believe their own thought are

Open Document