Similarities And Differences Between Atticus And To Kill A Mockingbird

1206 Words3 Pages

Beyond buzzing courtrooms of segregated townspeople and skies raining ashes reeking of kerosene, Harper Lee’s Atticus Finch (To Kill A Mockingbird), and Ray Bradbury’s Guy Montag (Fahrenheit 451) are both sui generis characters in their own stories because of their shared similarities deeper than eyes, ears, and noses. From their burning passions for knowledge and literature to their patient, unbiased hearts, the two men shake their communities to new realizations. Their idiosyncrasies made the relentless lawyer and runaway fireman standout in a society where laws are governed by people blinded in the bliss of oblivion.
When it comes to the people of Maycomb County, its population lived with their heels dug deep in the dirt and their minds …show more content…

Atticus unbound himself from the unspoken fundamentals of the county, he defended a black man. Although his own race was against him, he unabatedly believed Tom Robinson’s testimonies. In a time where money and race were factors that adjudged one's life, a poor, white man was seen as more important than a rich, black man. Born into a world divided by the black and white spectrums, Atticus saw the people less in colour and wealth, but simply as human beings whose paths should only be decided by their love and generosity; “As you grow older, you’ll see white men cheat black men every day of your life...whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that man is trash.” (Lee 295). Atticus taught Scout that essential goodness is beyond skin colour, and money isn’t a guide to character. Atticus fought against his society for the benefit of others. A heavier censorship also loomed over Guy Montag’s society. With time, books were replaced as technology prevailed, speed limits grew faster, and firefighters became fire-starters. Unlike any other citizen in his community, Guy found a sudden interest in books, ironically he was raised to be against knowledge like every other person in his city. Montag began to wonder what made books so important, he pondered the question as it scratched at the back of his head; “There must be something in books, something we can’t imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house; there must be something there. You don’t stay for nothing.” (Bradbury 48). As the unhappiness grew, Montag began to realize the faults in his society, he didn’t agree with the laws and chose to fight against his previous beliefs; “it was a pleasure to burn.” (Bradbury 1). However, as Montag burrowed deeper into books, his principles

Open Document