Sigmund Freud's Psychodynamic Approach

1839 Words4 Pages

Freud first developed these methods of psychoanalysis when he met with patients whose disorders did not make neurological sense. A patient, for example, may have suddenly gone blind. The problem is that there is no damage to either of his eyes. Freud began to wonder if this disorder might be psychological rather than physiological. A patient not wanting to see something that aroused anxiety might have caused his own blindness, he hypothesized. In order to find out what the anxiety stemmed from, he used methods of free association where the patient would say whatever came into his mind. Through the slips made when the patient was told to carry out the free-association process, and some of the patient's beliefs and habits, Freud could delve into …show more content…

There are very few traditional psychoanalysts who practice today, who follow all of Freud's theories about the mind, although most practitioners in the psychological field were influenced by the ideas set forth by Freud. Why do most of today's modern psychologists not follow the teachings of Freud, and what problems do they see in Freud's theory? The answer is that many specific ideas of Freud's theory have been refuted by recent medical research. Firstly, there is new research that shows that the development of the human mind is a life-long process and does not last, as Freud said, only through childhood. Conflicts can arise at any time of life, and can be rooted to any specific incident. Also, the idea that a boy resolves the Oedipus complex during the phallic stage is under scrutiny. Boys gain an idea of being male at an earlier age and gain this identity even without a father present. The same holds true for girls and the Electra complex. Freud's theory of dreams is also disputed today, as many psychologists believe that dreams are a method of disguising wishes and are not, as Freud said, to be viewed as a method for determining the source of conflict. Some critics of psychoanalysis say that the assumptions made by psychoanalysts in response to a free-association session can be viewed in two ways. If a psychoanalyst would point out that a repressed feeling exists in the patient, the patient can either respond that the repressed feeling does in fact exist, or he can answer that it does not exist. The denial of the existence of that particular repressed feeling given by the patient, can be viewed as a way of blocking a feeling the patient does not want the psychoanalyst to know about, or can possibly be a feeling that does not exist at all. The fact that a clear and definite solution cannot be derived from the patient's response is another reason why there are many dissenters to Freud's

Open Document