Siege Of Constantinople Dbq

1071 Words3 Pages

Constantinople was considered a wealthy city during its time. Constantinople was located right next to the sea and was a bridge between Asia and Europe; with the sea surrounding most of the city, it provided a useful source of oversea goods and services. The ruler of Constantinople, Constantine, understood the appeal of Constantinople to other rulers. So, to keep his power and his city safe, “Constantine paid gold to his enemies in an attempt to keep the peace” (The Siege of Constantinople, 2011). The problem with this method was that soon Constantine ran out of money. As the city because bankrupt, it also became the capital due to the fall of Rome. This was a perfect time for an invasion, and that is exactly what the Ottomans did. The Ottomans …show more content…

Salah al-Din was described as an honorable man; “he was able to remain humble with the humble, even after he had become the most powerful of the powerful” (Maalouf, A., pg.177-178). Salah al-Din shred tears when people passed away, whether they were blood related or not, and he always gave to people. He gave to people so often, whether that was through aid or money, that it was stated that “Saladin’s generosity sometimes bordered on the irresponsible” (Maalouf, A., pg.179). When Salah al-Din took over Jerusalem though, you could see the parallels between Salah al-Din and Mehmed fighting style. There was a point during the time when Salah al-Din was trying to take over Jerusalem that he strategic planned his attacks from all sides of Tiberias. During that time, Tiberias was a dry stretch of land, there was only one main water source, but that source was limited. When Salah al-Din had the army attack from every corner against the Frankish army, it weakened their opponents. “Franj were exhausted, dying of thirst, that they had neither the strength nor the time to cut themselves a passage to the lake before dark, and that they would therefore have to spend the night without a drop to drink” (Maalouf, A., pg.191). This type of strategies made it easy for his army to fight against the Frankish army, and when we think back to the strategies that of the sultan Mehmed they are similar. Another similarity is the use of weaponry. Salah al-Din army used catapults against his enemies. On November 1183, it was stated that Salah al-Din ordered his army to “set up catapults around the citadel of Karak” so that they would disrupt a wedding that was taking place inside (Maalouf, A., pg. 187). Although both rulers have similar fight styles, one thing that should not be forgotten is how they treated their enemies. The Sultan Mehmed did not show may remorse to

Open Document