Should Schools Be Wired To The Internet?

950 Words2 Pages

Technology can be a very useful item, as well as being an advantageous item if used improperly. Schools have been trying for multiple years to use technology to better help the learning initiative as well as the education status When the education system doesn’t see if what is taken away from the children when you introduce technologies in the classroom. It is essential for academies to focus on the benefits of obtaining technology as well as aged dispositions that are transpiring. After taking a deep look at whether technology has a positive impact or a negative impact then make their decisions for the education system. In the local paper in Arizona, a man by the name of Arthur Rostein wrote an insert about how he thinks we should implement …show more content…

They could say that technology could be dangerous when used incorrectly or inappropriately. A political cartoon that was made by Angel Boligan in 2008 put an even bigger spotlight on the technology that children were using. The amount of time kids are on their technology is out rages. Boligan makes the connection that the children see the same thing on the television that they do outside. Since, kids are drawn to the television or technology, they would rather watch the tv instead of going outside and explore it in person. An article in Time magazine written by David Gelernter in 2006 answers the question, “Should Schools Be Wired To The Internet?” Gelernter uses a beautiful metaphor is his insert when he states,” the fanciest scuba gear on the market-but these kids don’t know how to swim, and fitting them out with scuba gear isn’t just useless, it’s irresponsible; they’ll drown”. That is how Gelernter explain what will happen if we put more technology into schools. They already have the computers and the televisions and the videotapes and CD’s at the school. If we were to add more technology it would turn into the snowball effect that the school wouldn’t be able to bounce back from. Gelernter also argues,” Our children’s attention spans are too short already, but the Web is a propaganda machine for short attention spans”. If a child gets bored when they are on the computers, then …show more content…

Society has already accepted it, which makes it easier for the kids to learn more about it and use it more efficiently. In a New York newspaper, Steven Johnson wrote about how computers have taken the place of pen and paper. He argues,” On a certain level these two mental states are totally incompatible – bits versus atoms – but the truth is I have no trouble reconciling them…tools of ink and paper; today it belongs to the zeros and ones. The basic shape of the circuit is unchanged”. Johnson grew up writing with pen and paper, but now he can’t even think about writing without a computer, or typing. Johnson also argues,” I can’t imagine writing without a computer. Even jotting down a note with a pan and paper feels strained…I have to think about writing”. As I said earlier, Johnson grew up writing with pen and paper, not typing on a key board. Now, he is more comfortable typing on a keyboard instead of writing with pen and

Open Document